It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I'm getting really confused about who the bad guys are.
Originally posted by bigyin
Ok so Sky News just telling us that the Boston terrorists are from Checnya. They gave some info about Chechnya and said that radicals from there have gone to Syria to fight against Assad.
Hmm, but the West supports the terrorists in Syria, so these Boston Bombers are on our side right ?
Another point about Boston, The Irish Republican Army, a terrorist group received much of their funding from Boston, and used it to buy weapons from Gadaffi in Libya and in turn attack UK mainland targets with bombs, just like those seen in Boston.
I'm getting really confused about who the bad guys are.
The channel also said they couldn't think why radicals from Chechnya would attack Boston, USA, well maybe it has something to do with what USA is doing in Syria and other Muslim countries.
Who knows.
link to Boston Police Scanner
edit on 19-4-2013 by bigyin because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by muzzleflash
reply to post by Chipkin9
What you said is very true.
I don't support either side because I believe violence is the problem, not the solution.
Originally posted by bigyin
I don't support violence end of.
IRA were definitely terrorists no doubt and it was the large Irish section of Boston that kept them going in funds.
I even had a friend say he had no sympathy for the Bostonians because he remembers the violence they supported back in the 70's. Though I think most of the donators were unaware of what there money was being used for.
Anyway if my ideas are correct about this Chechin guy it could be that this is the start of a sustained bombing campaign in USA and other Western targets. Am I right in saying Assad warned about his just a few days ago, maybe last week.
Basically supporters of Iranian/Syrian Muslims will turn to terror to get their message over. Assad mad out it was the other side that would cause the trouble but we are now in a situation where either side can carry out attacks and blame the other.
We would never know who was doing it.
I will assume they acted alone, unless something else comes up.
At least it wasn't the Koreans.
Originally posted by Chipkin9
Your title says "Terrorism Links - Boston, Chechnya, Syria, Ireland, "; But I fail to see the connection between Irelands IRA and the the Boston bombings, or the IRA and Chechnya and Syria
I don't know what the IRA's link to Gaddafi have to do with it either.
I believe acts of terrorism are not the way to get you message across...but then again what are these groups supposed to do when violence/terrorism are brought upon them from their own governments or foreign governments? Stand and take it or rise against it fighting violence with violence?
It's a crap world!
Like you said in OP, it's confusing.edit on 19-4-2013 by Chipkin9 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by bigyin
There is no direct link between IRA attrocities and the Boston bombing. But there is a link between the IRA bombing and Boston. Boston funded them. So does that make Bostonians terrorists because they funded a terrorist organisation ? The Boston money went to Gaddafi who supplied weapons to the IRA. Do folk in Boston know this or are they still living in lala land.
They must have been told at the time that the IRA were freedom fighters, not terrorists, and so they gave over money.
My point is it's becoming more difficult to say who the good guys are and who are the bad guys. Maybe these two bombers had relatives killed by the IRA, that would be enough to cause some people to seek revenge. I doubt that is the case here though.