It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AnarchoCapitalist
Originally posted by MrSpad
Police scanners say a third bomb was destroyed in a controlled demolition, while the latest reports say it was a fire that caused an explosion, at the same time as the bombs went off.
edit on 4/18/2013 by AnarchoCapitalist because: (no reason given)
Read that these two were members of a Saudi Wahhabi AlQuaeda groupGuess then that it's an interesting coincidence that most everyone in Saudi Arabi is of the Wahabbi persuasion and that the first suspect with the burnt hands (?) was immediately shuffled back to Saudi Arabia...3rd actor??? 3rd bomb???
Originally posted by MrSpad
Wait they had security at major sporing event like the Boston Mararthon that is potential target for terrorism? That is crazy. Next thing you know they will have security at the Super Bowl or the Olympics.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
So a security company was present at a major public event, swanning around easily identifiable in public, and you and lots of others think that is suspicious??
Really????
Originally posted by McGinty
Question:
If the bombing was staged, then why let the the private contractors wear such easily identifiable clothing?
They'd have known that photos and CCTV of the scene before and after would be all over the web - are they really that dumb?
Originally posted by AGWskeptic
Originally posted by winofiend
Originally posted by AnarchoCapitalist
Have you EVER heard of police conducting a bomb drill at any public event - ever?
Only when they want to keep it a secret so that the public will never know that they were in fact the perpetrators of the crime that has gotten the entire worlds attention, and so that they can easily get away with it and never ever have people wonder about it.
That's the only time I've ever seen this happen.
It's a rilly gud plan.
Actually it is quite common to conduct training during big events, it saves money by keeping the resources busy with needed training while still being available if needed. It's just smart resource management.
I took place in a few national guard/local police drills after 9/11.
We had to get our communication worked out (different systems at the time) and learn how the LEO's did things and they learned how we do things.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
So a security company was present at a major public event, swanning around easily identifiable in public, and you and lots of others think that is suspicious??
Originally posted by hellobruce
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
So a security company was present at a major public event, swanning around easily identifiable in public, and you and lots of others think that is suspicious??
If security was NOT present the same people would be whining that as no security was present they knew about the bombing beforehand so that is also suspicious....
Originally posted by ParasuvO
reply to post by McGinty
Answer: So all the people like you who will blindly think it is too obvious that way, and immediately dismiss it.
People are so compartmentalized in the thinking it is no wonder the compartmentalized police just knee-jerk react with incredible energy once a higher source gives them the "whodunit gettem!"
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
Originally posted by McGinty
Question:
If the bombing was staged, then why let the the private contractors wear such easily identifiable clothing?
They'd have known that photos and CCTV of the scene before and after would be all over the web - are they really that dumb?
Another good point. Looks like Alex Jones' version of the story is crumbling fast..