posted on Apr, 18 2013 @ 07:57 PM
Originally posted by AnarchoCapitalist
Originally posted by MrSpad
Wait they had security at major sporing event like the Boston Mararthon that is potential target for terrorism? That is crazy. Next thing you know
they will have security at the Super Bowl or the Olympics.
They had a private military contractor that specializes in military training at a marathon, all of them carrying black backpacks.
right - black backpacks - therefoer they weer all bombers....??!! How many otehr people weer carry black backpacks that day? I have one at my desk
They had the bomb squad already on scene.
They conducted a bomb drill BEFORE the attacks took place.
According to a couple of sources that may or may not be true - but if it is true, then isn't that how such agencies train - doing ddrilles before
hand? and at the sites of large public gatherings os as to have practice with crowd handling?
Would you rather they only had drilles after attacks and in isolation so that they have no idea about how to work around crowds??
They had contractors on the roof overlooking the explosions.
And also overlooking a large public event.
by this reasoning everyon within 100 yards of the explosions was actually guilty of overseeing those explosions!
They debuted a new mass casualty monitoring system at the marathon, the day of the attack.
Again - what better time to do so? There is a higher-than-usual liklihood of multiple casualties from such an event even without bombs
The official story is that there was no bomb drill and no warning was given about the attack.
Witnesses report a woman telling runners that they would die if they ran in the marathon the next day.
Police scanners say a third bomb was destroyed in a controlled demolition, while the latest reports say it was a fire that caused an explosion, at the
same time as the bombs went off.
There were, and still are, a lot of confused stories coming out about what did and didnt' happen.
To say that any of them are definitely true in hte first palce speaks to your gullibilty and willing to accept whatever suits your preconceptions,
rather than any "problems" with "the official story"
edit on 18-4-2013 by Aloysius the Gaul because: (no reason given)