A question on chemtrail ripples/ or waves?

page: 1
1
<<   2 >>

log in

join

posted on Apr, 17 2013 @ 05:46 PM
link   
Sup yall.

I am curious about what the ripples or wave looking in some cloud formations could be? I've seen them on nice or miserable days, and it seems to be the structure of the cloud. I'm also pretty sure most of you have seen them and need no picture.

I used to think they were caused by radio frequencies in the skies, but they seem to over the place in different clouds, but in parallel in their structure.
I've also seen sundogs(rainbow clouds) in these cloud pattern depending on where the sun is hitting them.

Some will probably say Harp, but I dont think it has the wattage for such scales.

Also no long videos please.
edit on 17-4-2013 by Specimen because: (no reason given)




posted on Apr, 17 2013 @ 05:53 PM
link   
reply to post by Specimen
 


Is this what you are talking about?

en.wikipedia.org...

They are a completely natural phenomenon.



posted on Apr, 17 2013 @ 06:01 PM
link   
reply to post by underduck
 


Yes indeed.



posted on Apr, 17 2013 @ 06:02 PM
link   
I'm curious about why you would use the non-existent word "chemtrail" instead of the real word that's been given to those trails since powered flight: contrail.



posted on Apr, 17 2013 @ 06:09 PM
link   
reply to post by _BoneZ_
 


If that contrail was more prominent then the bigger cloud above it, then I dont believe it to be natural.



posted on Apr, 17 2013 @ 06:16 PM
link   
reply to post by Specimen
 

But you still didn't answer my question. Trails in the sky always have been and always will be contrails. Why did you use the word "chemtrail" instead of the correct word?



posted on Apr, 17 2013 @ 06:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by _BoneZ_
reply to post by Specimen
 

But you still didn't answer my question. Trails in the sky always have been and always will be contrails. Why did you use the word "chemtrail" instead of the correct word?





Coz contrails are jet exhaust, whereas chemtrails are trails of chemicals.



posted on Apr, 17 2013 @ 06:35 PM
link   
The problem is when "chemtrail" believers see clouds, they see "chemclouds" or HAARP.
But this:
picture that will not imbed


...is completely natural.

edit on 17-4-2013 by stars15k because: (no reason given)
edit on 17-4-2013 by stars15k because: (no reason given)
edit on 17-4-2013 by stars15k because: timed out?



posted on Apr, 17 2013 @ 06:37 PM
link   
reply to post by stars15k
 


I'm on the fence, however, showing a pic of a natural phenomena does not automatically make everything natural.



posted on Apr, 17 2013 @ 06:52 PM
link   
reply to post by VoidHawk
 


EVery cloud shown online is something that is easily explained by science.
They don't need "chem-" or HAARP, or anything else.



posted on Apr, 17 2013 @ 06:58 PM
link   
reply to post by Specimen
 

To answer the OPs question.

The atmosphere is just an ocean made up of gasses.

You have currents. Called winds.
You have ripples. When two different direction winds brush each other at different altitudes.
You have whirl pools. Called storms.
You have thermal layers. Like in a lake with cols spots by your feet.



posted on Apr, 17 2013 @ 07:06 PM
link   
I'm only calling them chemtrails since its a common name for them. Also you people seem to know what I'm talking about when I said.

Should I name them Plane tracks instead.



posted on Apr, 17 2013 @ 07:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by VoidHawk
Coz contrails are jet exhaust, whereas chemtrails are trails of chemicals.

Contrails are not jet exhaust. Contrails are short for CONdensation TRAILS. The white trail you see behind planes is from water moisture coming from the exhaust.

Every single white trail in the sky will be a water moisture contrail. Many of us non-believers would love to know how you can look up at the sky and claim that one white trail, which looks exactly like another, is called a "chemtrail" while the other is called a contrail. They all look exactly the same, but you want to somehow claim that one is a sprayed chemical when you can't possibly tell what chemical is in any trail in the sky.

Which brings me back to:


Every single white trail in the sky will be a water moisture contrail.





edit on 17-4-2013 by _BoneZ_ because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 17 2013 @ 07:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by Specimen
I'm only calling them chemtrails since its a common name for them.

No, it's not a common name for them. The word "chemtrail" isn't even a real word. It's a made-up word by the disinformation artists who created the "chemtrail" hoax.



Originally posted by Specimen
Should I name them Plane tracks instead.

How about calling them the correct, proper word that has been given to them for almost a century: contrails. It's not that hard.



posted on Apr, 17 2013 @ 07:20 PM
link   
Thats # of load of condensation.
edit on 17-4-2013 by Specimen because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 18 2013 @ 01:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by Specimen
Thats # of load of condensation.


Less than you think - it does not take a lot of water to make a cloud visible - a table on this page gives figured of 0.002-0.03 grams/cubic meter for cirrus clouds



posted on Apr, 18 2013 @ 04:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by VoidHawk

Coz contrails are jet exhaust, whereas chemtrails are trails of chemicals.


This is not correct.

Contrails are water ice, the term is a contraction of "condensation trail".

Jet exhaust is invisible and DOES contain chemicals, the ones left by the combustion process of the engines.

Jets often fly without leaving a contrail, if you see one that's not leaving a jet exhaust, call 911



posted on Apr, 18 2013 @ 09:24 AM
link   

Originally posted by _BoneZ_
reply to post by Specimen
 

But you still didn't answer my question. Trails in the sky always have been and always will be contrails. Why did you use the word "chemtrail" instead of the correct word?




Not bad.

Trying to teach people how to think?

That's an old trick.

The Chemtrails are real.

edit on 18-4-2013 by TauCetixeta because: (no reason given)
edit on 18-4-2013 by TauCetixeta because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 18 2013 @ 10:10 AM
link   
reply to post by TauCetixeta
 





Trying to teach people how to think?


Yes asking questions makes people think, why are you so against this?




That's an old trick.


So is pulling a rabbit out of a hat, not sure how tricks come into play... Ahhh, I see post a hoax video to try and trick those that refuse to think,




Not bad.



Not bad at all



posted on Apr, 18 2013 @ 10:15 AM
link   
reply to post by InhaleExhale
 


The MSM tries and fails to do that everyday.

They need to try something new.





top topics
 
1
<<   2 >>

log in

join


Haters, Bigots, Partisan Trolls, Propaganda Hacks, Racists, and LOL-tards: Time To Move On.
read more: Community Announcement re: Decorum