It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SearchLightsInc
With respect, this thread is just about highlighting the clear class divide that has shown itself brutally in this country since her passing. What You've quoted regarding the backhanding of youth, was placed in this thread to show how the right has tried to silence the youth, to impose the idea that they know nothing of history or politics, by telling them they weren't around at the time and therefore their view points are mute. But contradictory to the point, if those same people were to have an opinion on Hitler or Saddam's politics, any "disrespectful" remark would be allowed, perhaps even welcomed.
Class divide - Tory's dont want one of their own (that they booted out of office) to go to the grave as nothing short of a martyr to right wing ideology.
Originally posted by something wicked
Originally posted by SearchLightsInc
reply to post by DISRAELI
She "won" her battles? Did you miss the part about putting 3-5 million people out of work, effecting and destroying many families, the loss of secure well paid jobs where people could actually have a dispute with their employer? The loss of industrial skill sets, such as ship building, steel working?
You dont think there's a little more to it than people feeling defeated by this woman?
Sheesh, I hope you never go into politics or finance. As emotive as the subject is, do you know how many industries were working at a loss? Do you think that should have continued ad infinitum until the UK was completely bankrupt? You come out with socialist worker rhetoric which has no backing in fact - notice how no large private companies took on the opportunity to rebuild those industries in the UK? Why do you think that is?
Originally posted by Freeborn
reply to post by NoMatterNeverMind
Of course not everything that is wrong today can be blamed on Thatcher.....but many of today's problems can be directly traced back to her policies - and it's impossible to underestimate the effect and 'inspiration' she was to the current rabble.
However, it is equally correct to point out that every Prime Minister that has followed has in various ways compounded the problems and contributed to the current situation.
Originally posted by NoMatterNeverMind
In this situation, who is "the right" that you are talking about?
Is it the BBC for what some seem to think is biased reporting? Is it the Monarchy for attending the funeral? Is it a great deal of currently elected MPs for respecting her in death?
Sorry, it probably seems like I am trying to create an argument, I am really not, I just think having some more sources or points to back this up would go a long way to my understanding of the whole situation which I am doing my best to understand from a plethora of different points of view.
Originally posted by SearchLightsInc
Originally posted by something wicked
Originally posted by SearchLightsInc
Originally posted by AmberLeaf
Most of the people on the streets were tourists according to the news.
The protests were happening but were avoided by the media to make out everyone loved the woman. Plenty of pictures on twitter of people holding signs against the woman, none made it onto the tv.
£18m for all this, maybe a bit more. Straight out of the taxpayers pocket, we wasnt asked, we were told we would be paying for it.
Democracy my arse
Hear Hear, Have you got a link to the twitter pics?
Nice fabrication in your OP. In the 24 hours after her death there were interviews and comments on the BBC from Peter Hatton (chief thief of Liverpool council, radical left wing hypocrite), George Galloway (self opinionated twat), Tony Benn (dinosaur but he does like the sound of his own voice) and Gerry Adams (mouthpiece of the IRA during Thatchers terms as PM). Strangely they didn't have a lot of praise to give. Also, many soundbites from union leaders who expressed in their own unique way how sad they were that the Thatcher government stopped the unions effectively ruining the country. Maybe you were watching a different channel?
No im certain it was the BBC and i didnt see any of what you claimed to have been aired so either im lying or there was more ass kissing of thatcher than there were down to earth opinions on her passing? I suppose i can already tell where you stand on the political scale when you refer to Tony Benn as a dinosaur who likes the sound of his own voice - No respect for the living have you? At least that "dinosaur" has a heart and a greater understanding of the country he has lived in and served, The same cant be said for the majority of the conservative benches
I'm no member of the elite but I'm just about old enough to remember this country as the shambles it was in the '70's - I don't know if you are, but if you had been then you may just be able to understand (unless you were a disciple of chief scum Scargil - the real villain of the piece) why radical change was necessary.
Change was necessary, putting 3-5 million people on the breadline was not. All that was missing from her 11 years in power was gold star's sown onto coats and train cattle carriages to hide the destruction from public view once and for all.
Originally posted by SearchLightsInc
Originally posted by something wicked
Originally posted by SearchLightsInc
reply to post by DISRAELI
She "won" her battles? Did you miss the part about putting 3-5 million people out of work, effecting and destroying many families, the loss of secure well paid jobs where people could actually have a dispute with their employer? The loss of industrial skill sets, such as ship building, steel working?
You dont think there's a little more to it than people feeling defeated by this woman?
Sheesh, I hope you never go into politics or finance. As emotive as the subject is, do you know how many industries were working at a loss? Do you think that should have continued ad infinitum until the UK was completely bankrupt? You come out with socialist worker rhetoric which has no backing in fact - notice how no large private companies took on the opportunity to rebuild those industries in the UK? Why do you think that is?
Ive never stated that there was no need for change, however i am greatly critical as to how her and her government went about those changes. That's where the anger comes from. Do you understand that? Rub the pound signs out of your eyes and wake up.
Originally posted by Suspiria
reply to post by something wicked
Because the slave labor is cheaper elsewhere? Places like India have done quite well off the back of it, but now they are faced with workers who are suddenly demanding their rights to fair wages and the like. On the strength of that companies will and already are dropping them like flies to set up shop somewhere else. It will all come full circle of course when we really are completely crushed into the ground and we will work for our gruel.
Plus regardless of how rubbish and unstustainable our industries were, it's funny that the world still turns to us when they need excellence in the field.
edit on 17-4-2013 by Suspiria because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Freeborn
reply to post by something wicked
The deregulation of the finacial sector was a Thatcher policy.
The council house Right To Buy programme was a Thatcher policy.
The privatisation of nationalised industry was a Thatcher policy.
The implementation of The Ridley Plan was a Thatcher policy.
Need I go on?
Sure, some of those policies may have been as a direct result of previous governments policies but they were part of the process of moving away from Keynesian economics towards the more monetarist based economic approach which has become known as 'Thatcherism'.
Those policies were a marked different approach from those of Heath, Wilson or Callaghan.
Of course Thatcher's opponent's used 'propoganda' against her, that's the nature of the beast, but no-one was more efficient or manipulative when it come's to using 'propoganda' than Thatcher.
Deregulation in itself is not a problem though Freeborn. The recent financial problems are more because the powers of the FSA were not used properly - in other words the people running the FSA proved not to be fit for purpose.
The point of the deregulation was to reform the UK economy and whatever anyone thinks of her, in that she was completely successful.
..... people were not investing and businesses were shrinking. It was quite literally destroying the economy with every passing second.
Originally posted by something wicked
Originally posted by SearchLightsInc
Originally posted by something wicked
Originally posted by SearchLightsInc
Originally posted by AmberLeaf
Most of the people on the streets were tourists according to the news.
The protests were happening but were avoided by the media to make out everyone loved the woman. Plenty of pictures on twitter of people holding signs against the woman, none made it onto the tv.
£18m for all this, maybe a bit more. Straight out of the taxpayers pocket, we wasnt asked, we were told we would be paying for it.
Democracy my arse
Hear Hear, Have you got a link to the twitter pics?
Nice fabrication in your OP. In the 24 hours after her death there were interviews and comments on the BBC from Peter Hatton (chief thief of Liverpool council, radical left wing hypocrite), George Galloway (self opinionated twat), Tony Benn (dinosaur but he does like the sound of his own voice) and Gerry Adams (mouthpiece of the IRA during Thatchers terms as PM). Strangely they didn't have a lot of praise to give. Also, many soundbites from union leaders who expressed in their own unique way how sad they were that the Thatcher government stopped the unions effectively ruining the country. Maybe you were watching a different channel?
No im certain it was the BBC and i didnt see any of what you claimed to have been aired so either im lying or there was more ass kissing of thatcher than there were down to earth opinions on her passing? I suppose i can already tell where you stand on the political scale when you refer to Tony Benn as a dinosaur who likes the sound of his own voice - No respect for the living have you? At least that "dinosaur" has a heart and a greater understanding of the country he has lived in and served, The same cant be said for the majority of the conservative benches
I'm no member of the elite but I'm just about old enough to remember this country as the shambles it was in the '70's - I don't know if you are, but if you had been then you may just be able to understand (unless you were a disciple of chief scum Scargil - the real villain of the piece) why radical change was necessary.
Change was necessary, putting 3-5 million people on the breadline was not. All that was missing from her 11 years in power was gold star's sown onto coats and train cattle carriages to hide the destruction from public view once and for all.
Ah, so, a balanced debate. Trust me, the people I quoted did all comment on the BBC within 24 hours of her death - I'm not saying you are lying, how do I know if you literally watched the BBC for 24 hours.
I'm not sure I understand the 'no respect for the living' comment? I wouldn't wish Tony Benn dead, but I have no respect for his political philosophy for one reason - it doesn't work. Throwing in a cheap comment about 'the tory benches' doesn't substantiate your point, just shows your bias.
As for putting 3 - 5 million on the breadline - it's actually very hard to quantify that and I'm not saying this with any personal political opinion, it is just a fact. How long would any government continue to pay loss making industry until the point comes where it is completely unsustainable?
Originally posted by something wicked
Originally posted by SearchLightsInc
Originally posted by something wicked
Originally posted by SearchLightsInc
reply to post by DISRAELI
She "won" her battles? Did you miss the part about putting 3-5 million people out of work, effecting and destroying many families, the loss of secure well paid jobs where people could actually have a dispute with their employer? The loss of industrial skill sets, such as ship building, steel working?
You dont think there's a little more to it than people feeling defeated by this woman?
Sheesh, I hope you never go into politics or finance. As emotive as the subject is, do you know how many industries were working at a loss? Do you think that should have continued ad infinitum until the UK was completely bankrupt? You come out with socialist worker rhetoric which has no backing in fact - notice how no large private companies took on the opportunity to rebuild those industries in the UK? Why do you think that is?
Ive never stated that there was no need for change, however i am greatly critical as to how her and her government went about those changes. That's where the anger comes from. Do you understand that? Rub the pound signs out of your eyes and wake up.
Grow up and stop throwing childish comments about - you betray your age. The labour government in the 70's tried the same approach - look it up, it's not that difficult, but refused to stand up to the unions which led to things getting worse rather than better. The joke of this is that I am fairly ambivalent about Thatcher (not sure there are many who can say that), but it's the lack of an educated discussion on this that just peeves me off because there is this wealth of crap that has grown up and become perceived as fact.