It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SpearMint
Originally posted by Chipkin9
Originally posted by SpearMint
Originally posted by Chipkin9
Originally posted by Sandalphon
Wow, thank you so much for these two photos of the before and the after. I noticed you highlighted the unattended bag. Did you see the crowd though?
I bet one of the perps is that Mohammed-type guy , first picture, in the light colored jacket/shirt in the brick hallway with his hands in his pockets and his eyes on the ground. It's almost like he's bracing for something. Everybody else is looking at the runners, and he's hanging around on guard for something.
Excuse me for saying Mohammed type, but if you haven't read the paper lately there's a lot of those types causing trouble in terrorist style right now. In hindsight, the professionals said these were guys from Mali, but no I think they were from closer to Egypt (but maybe not Egypt) and funded by guys in Mali, but the guys who did it weren't from Mali.
Someone like him there would be three more somewhere. His hands could be in his pockets because that's where a cell phone or detonator could be.
Or I could be nuts.
edit on 16-4-2013 by Sandalphon because: no shades!
Or you could just be brainwashed into thinking that all people of Islamic religions are terrorists from over a decade of US Propaganda after 9/11?
Seriously the generalizing of Muslims in this thread is frankly a bit sickening.
Will you be apologizing for your stereotyping if/when it comes out that this attack was from a domestic terrorist?
I don't think you can really be angry at people for stereotyping, because fairly often with terrorist attacks the stereotype is correct. It's wrong to assume, but there's a reason people think this way.edit on 16-4-2013 by SpearMint because: (no reason given)
I am not angry, a little annoyed that people tar and feather an entire religious denomination because of an attack that 6 or 7 of them supposedly carried out over a decade ago; yes.
Can you link any sources to prove that "Fairly often with terrorist attacks the stereotype is correct"?
Exactly. It's impossible; because it's an opinion. Do you believe all Norwegians are terrorists after the Norway bombing that happened a few years ago? Or since they are a christian nation, do you believe that all Christians are terrorists?
I believe Christians have carried out more terror attacks throughout history than Muslims. More people have been murdered in the name of Jesus than Allah; and I am a Christian, and it shames me. And before anyone says "You're not a very good christian", well I am really, because I don't believe in war or inequality or superior races/religions, and I certainly haven't killed in the name of it, so there you have it.
It's not like people here are calling random Muslims on the street terrorists. There's a suspicious Muslim-looking guy in the photo. It's fair to suspect him.
Originally posted by Chipkin9
Originally posted by SpearMint
Originally posted by Chipkin9
Originally posted by SpearMint
Originally posted by Chipkin9
Originally posted by Sandalphon
Wow, thank you so much for these two photos of the before and the after. I noticed you highlighted the unattended bag. Did you see the crowd though?
I bet one of the perps is that Mohammed-type guy , first picture, in the light colored jacket/shirt in the brick hallway with his hands in his pockets and his eyes on the ground. It's almost like he's bracing for something. Everybody else is looking at the runners, and he's hanging around on guard for something.
Excuse me for saying Mohammed type, but if you haven't read the paper lately there's a lot of those types causing trouble in terrorist style right now. In hindsight, the professionals said these were guys from Mali, but no I think they were from closer to Egypt (but maybe not Egypt) and funded by guys in Mali, but the guys who did it weren't from Mali.
Someone like him there would be three more somewhere. His hands could be in his pockets because that's where a cell phone or detonator could be.
Or I could be nuts.
edit on 16-4-2013 by Sandalphon because: no shades!
Or you could just be brainwashed into thinking that all people of Islamic religions are terrorists from over a decade of US Propaganda after 9/11?
Seriously the generalizing of Muslims in this thread is frankly a bit sickening.
Will you be apologizing for your stereotyping if/when it comes out that this attack was from a domestic terrorist?
I don't think you can really be angry at people for stereotyping, because fairly often with terrorist attacks the stereotype is correct. It's wrong to assume, but there's a reason people think this way.edit on 16-4-2013 by SpearMint because: (no reason given)
I am not angry, a little annoyed that people tar and feather an entire religious denomination because of an attack that 6 or 7 of them supposedly carried out over a decade ago; yes.
Can you link any sources to prove that "Fairly often with terrorist attacks the stereotype is correct"?
Exactly. It's impossible; because it's an opinion. Do you believe all Norwegians are terrorists after the Norway bombing that happened a few years ago? Or since they are a christian nation, do you believe that all Christians are terrorists?
I believe Christians have carried out more terror attacks throughout history than Muslims. More people have been murdered in the name of Jesus than Allah; and I am a Christian, and it shames me. And before anyone says "You're not a very good christian", well I am really, because I don't believe in war or inequality or superior races/religions, and I certainly haven't killed in the name of it, so there you have it.
It's not like people here are calling random Muslims on the street terrorists. There's a suspicious Muslim-looking guy in the photo. It's fair to suspect him.
And there almost 50 suspicious looking Christian Americans there. I think it's fair to suspect them.edit on 17-4-2013 by Chipkin9 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Chipkin9
reply to post by SpearMint
Nope, but you did single out a Muslim dude and claimed that he looked suspicious and that stereotyping him as a terrorist because of that usually turns out to be true, so hence it was most likely him.
And your trolling commenced.
edit on 17-4-2013 by Chipkin9 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SpearMint
Originally posted by Chipkin9
reply to post by SpearMint
Nope, but you did single out a Muslim dude and claimed that he looked suspicious and that stereotyping him as a terrorist because of that usually turns out to be true, so hence it was most likely him.
And your trolling commenced.
edit on 17-4-2013 by Chipkin9 because: (no reason given)
No, I didn't. I was not the one that singled him out. He DOES look suspicious though.
Originally posted by Chipkin9
Originally posted by SpearMint
Originally posted by Chipkin9
reply to post by SpearMint
Nope, but you did single out a Muslim dude and claimed that he looked suspicious and that stereotyping him as a terrorist because of that usually turns out to be true, so hence it was most likely him.
And your trolling commenced.
edit on 17-4-2013 by Chipkin9 because: (no reason given)
No, I didn't. I was not the one that singled him out. He DOES look suspicious though.
Prove it.
Originally posted by FreedomEntered
reply to post by SpearMint
Well either way the boston bomber will probably go else where and do his thing again. Eventually they will catch him. Although he is quite quick and a smart ass.
You are not wrong for saying what you think. But I think you have to know that to convince others generally you need more proof than how someone looks.
But again...................... people need to realise that fanatical murderers do hold very strong opinions on all things like creation/death/life.
It could be the white christian on the left lol...........whos looking down sneakily at the floor.
edit on 17-4-2013 by FreedomEntered because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Libertygal
They have already said that if these were the pressure cooker bombs, a cellphone was not used as a detonator, so not so sure how someone out of the country could place and then detonate the bombs. The person will have been present within the preceeding two hours, at least.
Originally posted by stumason
Originally posted by Libertygal
They have already said that if these were the pressure cooker bombs, a cellphone was not used as a detonator, so not so sure how someone out of the country could place and then detonate the bombs. The person will have been present within the preceeding two hours, at least.
You raise some good and interesting points, but I thought I'd point out that mobile phones can be used as triggers for these kind of bombs - they use them in Afghan and other area's...