You cannot simply look at something that far away and tell it's chemical content. This is reality.
You cannot simply see persistent 'trails in the sky and say "chemtrail" unless and until you can prove they are somehow different than a contrail.
This is reality.
Clouds are dirty air and water. Contrails, whether invisible, short-lived, or persistent are dirty air and water. This is reality.
There is no proof geo-engineering is being done now, and would even look like what are described as "chemtrails". This is reality.
Cloud-seeding is a fact, but is not considered to be geo-engineering. The geo-engineering experts agree on that. If you would take the time to read
up on geo-engineering, you will not see cloud-seeding mentioned. This is reality.
Persistent contrails have been tracked to last as long as ten hours. But they reveal the conditions of the atmosphere and precede a coming weather
front and more clouds. They do not make weather, weather makes them happen. When you see cirrus clouds, they reveal the conditions of the atmosphere
and precede a coming weather front and more clouds. This is reality, and has been since clouds first formed weather.
More things are discussed and have patents applied for that do not work and will never be used
than are used. A simple google for "dumb
patents" will show thousands. Discussion never has been an admission; the same goes for research, modeled, debate... or any other such word or term.
This is reality.
As far as connecting the dots, you have failed. You went from "1" to "16", then to "38", then to finish. You don't understand the forces involved
and don't have a whole picture. You have an attempt to ignore all evidence that goes against your beliefs. And an acceptance of all stories of
"chemtrails" as geo-engineering, whether there is evidence or not. Which means your "dot-to-dot" is not close to what the picture was meant to be.
Unless your eyes are spectrometers, you can't look up and see more than ice crystals. This is reality.
edit on 27-5-2013 by stars15k because: