Originally posted by samkent
The reports from MSM keeps changing.
As of early this morning they claimed a third bomb failed to detonate. But the Feds say there were only two bombs.
For those who believe the 911 conspiracy do you see how the reports keep changing?
Can you see how early reports will be used to support a conspiracy later? Just like 911.
Or do you think the feds planted 3 bombs but one didn't go off so they had quash the reports of it. Basically another conspiracy.
What are you on about?! So there was confusion over one bomb! Big deal.
I'm a firm believer that 9/11 was an inside job based on all that I have researched, and I don't mean the stupid lasers from out of space type
However, I could tell from the start that the Boston bombings were nothing to do with anyone else other than a couple of crazy civilians. Firstly the
way it unfolded in the media, the media were left hanging for info, awaiting the press conferences from the FBI etc, the way Obama spoke, the way it
all unfolded, it was clear to see it did not have all the hallmark 'pre-prepared' signs of 9/11.
You could tell from the way the reporters, some people being interviewed (actors), and Bush acted, and the 'live' element on 9/11 had a different
feel about it. Boston was authentically live, and genuinely nothing to do with anyone other than rogue wannabe terrorists, but 9/11 did not have that
'live' authenticity about it because it's hard to pull off fake live perfectly!
Also, the FBI asking for photo's, videos etc, on 9/11 they didn't make that request, in fact they wanted that kind of material out of the way. They
happily showed the Boston bombs and victims on TV, and the CCTV footage, yet they would not release the CCTV of the 'plane' that supposedly hit the
They had pinned 9/11 on Bin Laden before they had even chance to properly investigate, and if BL was responsible he would have happily said it was him
from the start, but he actually denied having anything to do with 9/11.
There were non-actors being interviewed on 9/11, saying there was no 2nd plane, "it was a bomb" and then contradicting reports of what happened
coming from the 9/11 actors, so yeah there were some reporting discrepancies, but it's easy to spot which people were genuine in the 9/11 interviews,
and I know which ones I believe.
Also there were WTC7 reports before it happened, but that was not misreporting, they were just psychic reporters!
So to compare these 2 events is just not even worth going there, you are trying to create a conspiracy out of nothing, and then create an association
to 9/11, to deliberately discredit the genuine 9/11 conspiracy theorists.
Dirty tactics! Debunkers will do anything to put people off the trail!