Kerry Welcomes Chinese Investment in America's Infrastructure

page: 1
2

log in

join

posted on Apr, 15 2013 @ 02:10 PM
link   
www.weeklystandard.com...


Secretary of State John Kerry told the press in Beijing that he discussed with Chinese government officials investing in America's infrastructure. Kerry called the security concerns "very, very few; very, very little."


Yep read that "security concern very,very few, and little". Gee whatever could go wrong?


One of the things I’ve discussed with the State Councilor tonight was the possibility of China investing in infrastructure. We have proposals in the United States Congress to creature infrastructure bank. We have huge infrastructure needs in the United States for a certain series of projects like water projects, transportation projects, energy projects


Water,transportation,energy the key components that could cripple this country in a heartbeat, destroy trillions in wealth, if they chose to.

Uh Kerry the people who benefit the most is China.

Given the rampant outsourcing of defense tech( ic chips,telecom equipment), and just about every other thing in America hey let's get China to invest here!!

Really what could go wrong?

So here we have where they want congress to "create" an infrastructure bank so China can make billions on top of the trillions they already do.

Give it up for the secretary of outsourcing........... NOT.

From a National Security stand point you can't get any more asinine than foreign investment in infrastructure.




posted on Apr, 15 2013 @ 02:46 PM
link   
When I read about this new plan moving along, my first thought was "Welcome to China".




We've seen how Monsanto has got the government in it's back pocket already. How many more are lined up to be able to call the shots as well, with no regard for humanity of the environment or anything else? Corporate evil creeps up unobserved "...The latest approach of evil might not seem much - apparently, just some boring trade agreement. But, in reality, it is Evil Incarnate. ...It’s called the Trans-Pacific Partnership and if you thought the World Trade Organization (which forced the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act) and the North American Free Trade Agreement are bad then the TPP is awful! The TPP has gone through sixteen rounds of super-surreptitious negotiations. Six hundred lobbyists from the big international corporations have been ‘advising’ and anybody with a brain knows what that means. ...The TPP is intended to (finally) undermine democracy by handing power to the global financial elite and the big corporations. The key mechanism will be the transfer of power from sovereign nations to so-called ‘trade tribunals’ whose purpose is to make national laws subservient to corporate interests. These trade tribunals will do what they like: no government or electorate will be able to influence them..." www.presstv.ir...



posted on Apr, 15 2013 @ 02:52 PM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 


Yep, selling us out now that they have pilfered much of the coffers.

Old Moon Beam Brown, aka the Governor of Califnorna is about the exact same
activity....selling the once Golden State to China....


so Governor Moonbeam saddled up his unicorn and headed to the land of dreams
whose vast wealth is the answer to any progressive’s dream. Unfortunately China is run
by ruthless plutocrats who won’t be giving anything away for free and who have never
heard of the term “Quality Control”. But then neither has Jerry Brown. frontpagemag.com...


edit on 15-4-2013 by burntheships because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 15 2013 @ 02:59 PM
link   
reply to post by burntheships
 


Infrastructure spending is not even their idea they got it from China, trillions spent on ghost cities now sit empty.

One would think American investment by American companies, where the money would at least stay here instead of just being funneled to China.
edit on 15-4-2013 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 15 2013 @ 03:00 PM
link   
Not sure this is quite on topic, but just as disturbing, in the big scheme of things!




ALL WARS ARE BANKERS' WARS! whatreallyhappened.com...

"...Richard Nixon started the environmental movement, with the EPA and its various programs such as "wilderness zones", Roadless areas", Heritage rivers", "Wetlands", all of which took vast areas of public lands and made them off limits to the American people who were technically the owners of those lands.

But Nixon had little concern for the environment and the real purpose of this land grab under the guise of the environment was to pledge those pristine lands and their vast mineral resources as collateral on the national debt. The plethora of different programs was simply to conceal the true scale of how much American land was being pledged to foreign lenders as collateral on the government's debts;...."



posted on Apr, 15 2013 @ 03:04 PM
link   
Chinese Free Trade Zones in America.

21stcenturywire.com...




“A plan being pushed by the Chinese Central Bank would set up “development zones” in the United States that would allow China to “establish Chinese-owned businesses and bring in its citizens to the U.S. to work.” Under the plan, some of the $1.17 trillion that the U.S. owes China would be converted from debt to “equity”. As a result, “China would own U.S. businesses, U.S. infrastructure and U.S. high-value land, all with a U.S. government guarantee against loss.”



posted on Apr, 15 2013 @ 03:06 PM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 


It's not really outsourcing when under the umbrella of a global government. It's like changing your utility supplier at home.



posted on Apr, 15 2013 @ 03:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by EA006
reply to post by neo96
 


It's not really outsourcing when under the umbrella of a global government. It's like changing your utility supplier at home.


I would disagree since we already owe them trillions creating a "bank" where we have no money we are going further in to debt to them.



posted on Apr, 15 2013 @ 03:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by neo96

Originally posted by EA006
reply to post by neo96
 


It's not really outsourcing when under the umbrella of a global government. It's like changing your utility supplier at home.


I would disagree since we already owe them trillions creating a "bank" where we have no money we are going further in to debt to them.


America doesn't owe them money if the monies involved aren't American.



posted on Apr, 15 2013 @ 03:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by burntheships
 


American investment by American companies, where the money would at least stay here


Yep, money and control
I know, suspicious much.
Makes me wonder what they are really planning in the future.



posted on Apr, 15 2013 @ 03:41 PM
link   
Perhaps you shall end up like us in the UK, where the government shut down or sold most of our essential services so that now most things, gas, electricity, water companies, are owned by foreign companies who have no compassion for the people and constantly increase their prices and are bleeding the people dry with their greed.

And then one day, you wake up to find they have sold the country down the river and run off with the proceeds themselves.

There used to be a name used for people who sold 'their own' down the river.



posted on Apr, 15 2013 @ 03:43 PM
link   
It is funny I recall this exact same debate about Japan in the 1980s. I mean exactly. Same fears, same paranoia and the same US taking cash from a nation flush with it so that when the that nation starts the hard painful transition from a low wage manufacturing economy to a modern service economy we buy it all back at pennies on the dollar.





top topics
 
2

log in

join