posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 12:58 PM
Other than Plotus, nobody has maturely discussed this issue like the professionals you all claim to be on the matter. There is a methodology you all
need to follow. 1/2 of you just post crap without fully understanding what it is you're posting...and I'm referring to those on both sides here.
Enough of the ad hominem attacks. All of that education hasn't humbled any of you.
I suggest, that those who can't discuss a scientific phenomenon with the neutrality that accompanies our field aren't fit for this kind of a
discussion. As for the OP, NetworkDude, as someone who's spent so much time in the military, I expected more discipline in your responses. You should
ClairvoyantRose, you need to understand that when you take a stance, all of your evidence needs to be theoretically consistent. There should be no
question as to whether your claims are as you say when people look at your evidence.
MountainLaurel, having majored in a science in college, you should have become well exposed to the armies of people out there who wouldn't take
anything seriously, unless the evidence was concrete. You're speaking with the same people here. Your wording and evidence MUST be solid to prove
something that is not true to the consensus.
Everything other than Plotus' report has been virtually devoid of serious scientific investigation. Stop posting Youtube videos. Get serious. I can't
believe the mods have issues with profanity on this site, yet have no problem when terrible "evidence" against/for a topic is made.
22-4-2013 by Ewok_Boba because: (no reason given)