Chemtrail believers are going to be the Death of us all!

page: 10
11
<< 7  8  9   >>

log in

join

posted on Apr, 18 2013 @ 01:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by clairvoyantrose

Originally posted by network dude

Originally posted by clairvoyantrose
reply to post by network dude
 


I duno, since you're the "aviation expert" you could probably tell me.
Those are NOT contrails no matter how many times you say they are.


The answer is here.

It's just damn amazing what you can find if you take the time to actually look.


Would you look at that? The same damn website you post over and over again.
I think somebody gets paid by traffic to that website.


Why would I look somewhere else if all the answers were right there?

You pegged me, big fat lonely sad. No family, just people on ATS to annoy.

Oh, and I live in a basement. eating cheetoes and drinking red bull.

Do you do this for a living?




posted on Apr, 18 2013 @ 01:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by network dude

Originally posted by clairvoyantrose

Originally posted by network dude

Originally posted by clairvoyantrose
reply to post by network dude
 


I duno, since you're the "aviation expert" you could probably tell me.
Those are NOT contrails no matter how many times you say they are.


The answer is here.

It's just damn amazing what you can find if you take the time to actually look.


Would you look at that? The same damn website you post over and over again.
I think somebody gets paid by traffic to that website.


Why would I look somewhere else if all the answers were right there?

You pegged me, big fat lonely sad. No family, just people on ATS to annoy.

Oh, and I live in a basement. eating cheetoes and drinking red bull.

Do you do this for a living?


HAHA I WISH I DID THIS FOR A LIVING!
Man that would be the life



posted on Apr, 18 2013 @ 01:28 PM
link   
reply to post by clairvoyantrose
 


apparently all you need to do is switch over to our side, and you will be a paid shill.
at least that's what I keep getting told.



posted on Apr, 18 2013 @ 01:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by network dude
reply to post by clairvoyantrose
 


apparently all you need to do is switch over to our side, and you will be a paid shill.
at least that's what I keep getting told.


network dude, i'm sure you're a good dude but damn........... You're one hard headed mother f*cker.



posted on Apr, 18 2013 @ 01:33 PM
link   
reply to post by clairvoyantrose
 


I came here looking for answers to things I wanted to know. On the few things I do have answers for, I like to help others find them as well. They wouldn't be here if they weren't looking too.

So I can tell you about masonry, C-130's, contrails and beer. Beyond that, I am just another lost soul.

Oh, and I can tell you how to suck at golf, but not how to be good.



posted on Apr, 18 2013 @ 01:39 PM
link   
reply to post by network dude
 


What's the difference between me and you?
About 5 bank accounts, 3 ounces and 2 vehicles.



posted on Apr, 18 2013 @ 01:53 PM
link   
reply to post by clairvoyantrose
 


Based on the fact that you claimed to be a woman, I can think of at least one more.

(I can write my name in the snow)



posted on Apr, 18 2013 @ 02:26 PM
link   
I never have enough pee to complete my name... but I can kind of do it. Pants off that is.



posted on Apr, 18 2013 @ 02:56 PM
link   
reply to post by clairvoyantrose
 


Change your name to May. Then you can win the game.

I have an i in my name, so it's a bit painful, but I get it done.



posted on Apr, 18 2013 @ 05:29 PM
link   
reply to post by seamus
 




The T&C are pretty clear on not using jargon

The term "owned" is pretty common but I'll apologize for confounding you with such a simple term. How do you feel about using jargon such as "chemtrail"? It's not even a real word.



First, it's hare-brained, not hair brained.

You really thought that's worth splitting hairs over? Technically hare is preferred however both spellings appear in the dictionary. In the future try to BE correct when attempting to correct someone else.

What do the videos you posted have to do with proving that some contrails are actually the elusive "chemtrails"?



posted on Apr, 18 2013 @ 10:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by seamus
 




The T&C are pretty clear on not using jargon

The term "owned" is pretty common but I'll apologize for confounding you with such a simple term. How do you feel about using jargon such as "chemtrail"? It's not even a real word.



First, it's hare-brained, not hair brained.

You really thought that's worth splitting hairs over? Technically hare is preferred however both spellings appear in the dictionary. In the future try to BE correct when attempting to correct someone else.

What do the videos you posted have to do with proving that some contrails are actually the elusive "chemtrails"?
Elusive? I see them all the time.

I give up on you.

And, by the way, "jiggy" (as in, 'gettin' jiggy wit' it') appears in the Oxford English dictionary. That doesn't mean it's correct. Otherwise we could just flamnopulate any time we wanted to.



posted on Apr, 19 2013 @ 03:07 AM
link   
reply to post by seamus
 


How do you know you are seeing chemtrails all the time and not just contrails?



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 12:58 PM
link   
Other than Plotus, nobody has maturely discussed this issue like the professionals you all claim to be on the matter. There is a methodology you all need to follow. 1/2 of you just post crap without fully understanding what it is you're posting...and I'm referring to those on both sides here. Enough of the ad hominem attacks. All of that education hasn't humbled any of you.

I suggest, that those who can't discuss a scientific phenomenon with the neutrality that accompanies our field aren't fit for this kind of a discussion. As for the OP, NetworkDude, as someone who's spent so much time in the military, I expected more discipline in your responses. You should know better.

ClairvoyantRose, you need to understand that when you take a stance, all of your evidence needs to be theoretically consistent. There should be no question as to whether your claims are as you say when people look at your evidence.

MountainLaurel, having majored in a science in college, you should have become well exposed to the armies of people out there who wouldn't take anything seriously, unless the evidence was concrete. You're speaking with the same people here. Your wording and evidence MUST be solid to prove something that is not true to the consensus.

Everything other than Plotus' report has been virtually devoid of serious scientific investigation. Stop posting Youtube videos. Get serious. I can't believe the mods have issues with profanity on this site, yet have no problem when terrible "evidence" against/for a topic is made.
edit on 22-4-2013 by Ewok_Boba because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 4 2013 @ 08:16 AM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.



posted on May, 6 2013 @ 03:38 PM
link   
Things chemtrail believers NEVER answer....

1. If someone is spraying harmful chemicals on the populace, how to THEY (the ones doing it) protect their OWN family? Obviously their kids are breathing the same air, drinking the same water....so how, hmm???

2. These chemicals would be easy to track and thus easier to prove, especially due to ALL the people in the airlines, airports, and chemical companies that would have to be involved. How do they avoid such detection?





top topics
 
11
<< 7  8  9   >>

log in

join


Off The Grid with Jesse Ventura and AboveTopSecret.com Partner Up to Stay Vigilant
read more: Ora.TV's Off The Grid with Jesse Ventura and AboveTopSecret.com Partner Up to Stay Vigilant