It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
For the first time, scientists have managed to demonstrate that ten times more ice melts in the summer months on the Antarctic Peninsula now than it did 600 years ago.
It has been known for some time that temperatures across the Antarctic Peninsula have risen dramatically. Over the past fifty years there has been an increase of 2.8C, making this the most rapidly warming region in the Southern Hemisphere. This is over five times the global average and comparable to rapidly warming regions of the Arctic.
The latest research looks at a 364 m ice core, which was extracted from the northern tip of the peninsula. Visible layers of this tube of ice show where the ice melted, then refroze. By measuring the thickness of the layers and analysing the gases contained in the ice, researchers were able to determine the changes in temperatures in the region over the last 1,000 years.
The ice core demonstrated that the current level of melting was unprecedented in the last 1,000 years, and ten times more than it was 600 years ago.
The climate of Antarctica is hugely complex. Although there are record levels of glacier and ice melting, there also appears to be an increase in the sea ice in the surrounding waters.
Just seven months ago satellites captured images of more ice floating around the continent than at any other time in history.
The increase in sea ice is thought to be caused by the increased amounts of melting ice. This melted ice runs into the sea, but does not mix with the water already in the ocean. Instead the water forms a separate, colder, layer on the surface of the ocean. This can protect sea ice from coming into contact with the warmer seas below and therefore prevent it melting.
It is also thought that a change in wind direction could have increased the extent of sea ice. Winds can both physically moving the ice, and can cause the sea surface to warm or cool. The increase in sea ice is not uniform around the Antarctic coast line, therefore the winds are also likely to have had some effect.
With the complex climate of Antarctica, and the uncertainty of the future of the climate, it is difficult to predict what this latest study means for the continent.
It is believed that the continent will continue to warm rapidly, particularly in summer, increasing the vulnerability of the delicate ecosystem of the continent.
The global significance of this is difficult to assess. However, the warming of the Antarctic Peninsula is amongst the highest seen anywhere on Earth in recent times, and is a reminder of the rationality of climate change that can be expected in the future.
The climate of Antarctica is hugely complex. Although there are record levels of glacier and ice melting, there also appears to be an increase in the sea ice in the surrounding waters.
This is kind of important...
And so if the fact that just because there is more melt happening, doesn't mean that the ice is being "lost" because as the OP states, it is re-freezing the same ice.
Also, measuring melt and temperature inside of an ice core, inside of a tube, is NOT the same as it being in a natural state captured in the vast amounts of deep ice that bring along a ton of other variables that are not present in the isolated state when in the tube.
It is far from "apples to apples" IMO and feels a lot more like an agenda.
~Namaste
Originally posted by atlasastro
What is even more important is that the ice melt that runs into the seawater increases sea levels. Refreezing it as sea ice doesn't mean anything in relation to that.
If you have a glass with two ice cubes(sea ice) and add another two ice cubes(glacier melts) the water level will rise.
If you could link any material that proves the above statement in relation to the ice core data and what it presents in terms of historical rates of melting based on seasons, I would appreciate it.
Otherwise it just "feels" like an opinion.
Sophisticated chemical analysis — at BAS and the NERC Isotope Geosciences Laboratory (part of British Geological Survey) — was used to re-create a temperature record over this period.
By 11,000 years ago the temperature had risen to about 1.3°C warmer than today’s average...
BTW, when you get a blood test, and the doctor gives you the results, do you state "well doctor I know my blood states that, but that blood came from a tube that was a sample and not in its natural state captured in vast amounts of blood and vessels so that brings along a ton of variables. Doc, to be honest this feels like an agenda!"
Do you?
So you question that science too? I am curious because it is basically the same concept. Taking samples and looking at characteristics.
So i guess we are to go by the data of your "feelings".
Ummkay.
Originally posted by SonOfTheLawOfOne
You assume that all of the melting ice runs into the seawater when that simply is not true. There are vast pools of melted water (Lake Vostok being a great example) in Antarctica, and several rivers that run through the continent, so again, it's not apples to apples.
It has been known for some time that temperatures across the Antarctic Peninsula have risen dramatically.
The latest research looks at a 364 m ice core, which was extracted from the northern tip of the peninsula.
The increase in sea ice is thought to be caused by the increased amounts of melting ice. This melted ice runs into the sea, but does not mix with the water already in the ocean. Instead the water forms a separate, colder, layer on the surface of the ocean.
Are you stupid? We are talking about Ice that is on the land that is melting and then running into the ocean.
You are making a broad assumption with your ice cube example and it does not apply here because you're ..... You are not "adding" two more ice cubes, both sets are still the same mass of ice located in different parts of the glass.
Also, measuring melt and temperature inside of an ice core, inside of a tube, is NOT the same as it being in a natural state captured in the vast amounts of deep ice that bring along a ton of other variables that are not present in the isolated state when in the tube.
Your are wrong, dead and simple.
Their analysis gives an understanding of the temperature over several thousand years, NOT ice melt, which is why I made the comment.
www.nature.com...
Here we reconstruct changes in ice-melt intensity and mean temperature on the northern Antarctic Peninsula since AD 1000 based on the identification of visible melt layers in the James Ross Island ice core and local mean annual temperature estimates from the deuterium content of the ice. During the past millennium, the coolest conditions and lowest melt occurred from about AD 1410 to 1460, when mean temperature was 1.6 °C lower than that of 1981–2000. Since the late 1400s, there has been a nearly tenfold increase in melt intensity from 0.5 to 4.9%. The warming has occurred in progressive phases since about AD 1460, but intensification of melt is nonlinear, and has largely occurred since the mid-twentieth century. Summer melting is now at a level that is unprecedented over the past 1,000 years. We conclude that ice on the Antarctic Peninsula is now particularly susceptible to rapid increases in melting and loss in response to relatively small increases in mean temperature.
Do you see my point? You shouldn't blindly accept what the OP is saying without reading the original source, especially when it has such an alarmist tone to it.
Rapidly shrinking Arctic sea ice could be behind the recent unusually cold and snowy winters in the Northern Hemisphere, a new model suggests.
From 2007 to 2011, large parts of the U.S., northwestern Europe, and northern and central China experienced early or abnormally heavy snowfall.
Some scientists have speculated that such harsh winters might be a result of disappearing Arctic sea ice, which reached a record low in 2007 due to global warming, according to the U.S. National Snow and Ice Data Center.
To test that theory, scientists entered data about Arctic sea ice and sea-surface temperatures into a climate model created by the U.S. National Center for Atmospheric Research.
The results pinpointed two mechanisms for how a decline in sea ice could lead to more snowfall.
For one, major sea ice loss could alter how air circulates in the atmosphere, so that more cold air masses from the Arctic would travel farther south. At the same time, melting sea ice also exposes more ocean water, which results in increased water vapor in the atmosphere that can be transformed into snow.
Abstract
While the Arctic region has been warming strongly in recent decades, anomalously large snowfall in recent winters has affected large parts of North America, Europe, and east Asia. Here we demonstrate that the decrease in autumn Arctic sea ice area is linked to changes in the winter Northern Hemisphere atmospheric circulation that have some resemblance to the negative phase of the winter Arctic oscillation. However, the atmospheric circulation change linked to the reduction of sea ice shows much broader meridional meanders in midlatitudes and clearly different interannual variability than the classical Arctic oscillation. This circulation change results in more frequent episodes of blocking patterns that lead to increased cold surges over large parts of northern continents. Moreover, the increase in atmospheric water vapor content in the Arctic region during late autumn and winter driven locally by the reduction of sea ice provides enhanced moisture sources, supporting increased heavy snowfall in Europe during early winter and the northeastern and midwestern United States during winter. We conclude that the recent decline of Arctic sea ice has played a critical role in recent cold and snowy winters.