It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
1 - Truth is truth. The information is correct.
If the Christian world was half as influential on the Islamic religion as you make it seem, then Arabia would have become Christian. Pre-Islamic Arabia was a hotbed of idolatry and paganism, not a Christian kingdom.
1)All religions are earthly creations, and 2)only those who do not believe in them can judge them rationally. Your opinions are invalid precisely because you are a fervent believer.
Another example is the double standards of some christian posters here who use history like you use to prove islam is 'man-made'
but then disregard the historical view about Jesus pbuh that, if he was sighted after crucifixtion then he must have survived(interestingly thats the muslim view/belief)
you are not more eligible to have valid opinions unless you are open to all possibilities including divine.
I didn't realise you were such an expert on historical process that you could tell, at the remove of more than a thousand years, what should have happened (but somehow did not) in a country of which, at the period of which we speak, very little is known.
Read some world history. Learn what were the cultural influences on Arabia in the late sixth century, and its position as a buffer state, largely wasteland, between great empires.
....belief in its divine origin. All religions are earthly creations, and only those who do not believe in them can judge them rationally. Your opinions are invalid precisely because you are a fervent believer.
Jesus must have died first. That is plainly not the Muslim view or belief in the matter.
(everybody else thinks he mostly copied from Christian and Jewish antecedents
The Christian orthodox (Nicene and
Apostle's creedal) position is that
Jesus died and then, after being dead
for a while, lived again. The only
Chrisitan "must have" is that in order
to rise from death, Jesus must have died first. That is plainly not the Muslim
view or belief in the matter.
Islam is described as man-made
because all parties agree that the
Recitations first appeared when
Mohammed, a man, recited them.
The
disagreement is over how original the
composition is with him.
Astyanax must judge that for himself.
You don't have a vote in his judgment.
you are not more eligible to have valid
opinions unless you are open to all
possibilities including divine.
Another example is the double standards of some christian posters here who use history like you use to prove islam is 'man-made'
Originally posted by sk0rpi0n
reply to post by logical7
Another example is the double standards of some christian posters here who use history like you use to prove islam is 'man-made'
They are basically saying "what we believe is true and divine, what you believe is false and man made". In other words, "I am right, you are wrong" argument.
Atheists won't go beyond "God does not exist".
And Christians arguments begin and end with "Islam is a fake religion".
Complete waste of time.
61:8. They intend to put out the Light of Allah (i.e. the religion of Islam, this Qur'an, and Prophet Muhammad ) with their mouths. But Allah will
complete His Light even though the
disbelievers hate (it).
9. He it is Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad ) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islamic
Monotheism) to make it victorious
over all (other) religions even though
the Mushrikun (polytheists, pagans,
idolaters, and disbelievers in the
Oneness of Allah and in His Messenger Muhammed ) hate (it).
10. O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you
from a painful torment.
11. That you believe in Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause
of Allah with your wealth and your
lives, that will be better for you, if you
but know!
12. (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens
under which rivers flow, and pleasant
dwelling in Gardens of 'Adn - Eternity
['Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed
the great success.
13. And also (He will give you) another (blessing) which you love,
help from Allah (against your
enemies) and a near victory. And give glad tidings (O Muhammad ) to the believers.
14. O you who believe! Be you helpers (in the Cause) of Allah as said 'Iesa
(Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary), to Al-
Hawariun (the disciples): "Who are my
helpers (in the Cause) of Allah?" Al-
Hawarieen (the disciples) said: "We are
Allah's helpers" (i.e. we will strive in His Cause!). Then a group of the
Children of Israel believed and a
group disbelieved. So We gave power
to those who believed against their
enemies, and they became the
uppermost.
Exactly.
This basically kills the argument that Mohammad was actually influenced by Christianity.
The Christian orthodox (Nicene and Apostle's creedal) position is that Jesus died and then, after being dead for a while, lived again.
Well, some people say that the stories in the Bible are actually ripped off from other cultures in the middle east. So will Christians now dismiss their Bible as being a rip off of someone elses work.
I though you were not going to respond to me anymore?
I thank you for your reply, but conversation can only be impeded by one-two punches like calling my ideas stupid and then calling me personally a sarcastic name, featuring an inappropriate religious title which demeans my own religion. I did nothing to deserve that attack except to follow the OP's lead on what is actually an uncontroversial point. There is nothing else on the table from you for me to comment upon at this time.
Its also surprising how you skirt around something i said plainly and responded with a whole paragraph which contributes nothing either way.
You might want to read the part you snipped away.
I guess you missed this post
Nobody here was saying that the Christianity that reached Mohammed was the orthodox variety.
Much of what was 'revealed' to Muhammad were Greek Christian ideas
most people don't confuse literary influence with plagiarism.
Now there's an interesting thread idea - given that the Christian and Jewish religions were so obviously the antecedents of the Koran and that their lore so thoroughly preoccupied Mohammed, why didn't he institute a locally flavored version of Jewish-Christianity?
(Allâh) said:"Get you down (from the Paradise to the earth), both of you, together, some of you are an enemy to some others. Then if there comes to you guidance from Me, then whoever follows My Guidance shall neither go astray, nor fall into distress and misery. (Ta-Ha 20:123)
Originally posted by Logical7
the idea of man crushing the head of the serpent is not in Qur'an.
Originally posted by sk0rpi0n
Jinns, like angels and humans are a race of beings. Satan was one of the Jinn, but dwelled with angels because of his worship of God. And yes, Jinns are the evil spirits the bible speaks of, as they are capable of possessing humans.
Originally posted by sk0rpi0n
Regarding the enmity between Adam and Eve and their offspring, Islam teaches...
Allah said, "Descend from Paradise - all, your descendants being enemies to one another.
-Koran 20:123
I know Muslims accept the prophets of the OT, so I was curious about whether Islam views those verses more literally, or metaphorically, in relation to the Jin, seed and offspring etc…
For example, why is there enmity between the 2, and how does this tie in with the Jin and/or Satan etc…?
Obviously, you didn't get it from my statement, but rather you made it up.
In fact, you had misstated the typical
Christian position, I called you on it,
and you then wisely "clarified" your
position.
Another example is the double
standards of some christian posters
here who use history like you use to
prove islam is 'man-made'
but then disregard the historical view
about Jesus pbuh that, if he was sighted after crucifixtion then he must
have survived(interestingly thats the
muslim view/belief)
The Christian orthodox (Nicene and
Apostle's creedal) position is that
Jesus died and then, after being dead
for a while, lived again. The only
Chrisitan "must have" is that in order
to rise from death, Jesus must have died first. That is plainly not the Muslim
view or belief in the matter.
Forcing you to stick to the
truth when you trash-talk your
religiious rivals is a contribution to civil discussion.
And finally, your whining that I
supposedly didn't answer your
question about the role of Iblis in the
Islam. You asked on April 14, 0608 default
board time. You were answered 13
minutes later by Scorpie, the original
poster. He left it that if I had an
objection to his remarks, then I could
object. Actually, I thought he had understood my remarks well enough,
and had expressed his understanding
fairly enough to resolve your query,
which wasn't the topic of the thread.
Aren't you concerned that people will
think "Since logical7 makes up stuff
when it's so easy to check that he's
made it up, might he also be making
stuff up about things that are harder
to check?"
most people don't confuse literary influence with plagiarism.
Allegations of "literary influence" and "plagiarism" discounts the Muslim P.O.V that Mohammad directly received divine revelations. Its like saying "Mohammad was a fraud, he was either influenced or he plagiarized."
i think its more like,
"if Bible has it and other ancient sources also have it, its 'literary influence' but if Qur'an has it, only then its plagiarism"
"if i copy your work, i just took a little inspiration. If your work and mine have some similarities you stole mine"
sometimes its worth to just read the double standards and have a good laugh!edit on 16-4-2013 by logical7 because: (no reason given)
And yet you speak like you just know how exactly history unfolded...
Go read the basics of religious doctrine.
If, like you say, Christian culture influenced Mohammad... then Islam should have been identical to Christianity in terms of doctrine.
Then by the same standard, only those who don't subscribe to the theory of evolution can rationally assess and such ideas.
The problem with discussing religion with an atheist is that the discussion does not progress beyond God is real... no he isn't... yes He is..."
Christianity's teaches that Jesus "died".
Islam teaches that he didn't "die".
Christianity teaches that Jesus is God or "part of" God.
Islam teaches that Jesus was not God or part of God.
These facts render invalid all ideas of Islam being influenced by Christianity.
Jesus being God or a part of God... is a very important concept of Christianity. NOT in Islam.
I guess you missed this post
Allegations of "literary influence" and "plagiarism" discounts the Muslim P.O.V that Mohammad directly received divine revelations. Its like saying "Mohammad was a fraud, he was either influenced or he plagiarized."
And also should i get offended that you assume i am ignorant about christian creed!!
What I’m trying to figure out is whether Muslims view those verses in Genesis 3:15 as allegorical or more literal in nature, and how it fits into there overall theological beliefs, in relation to Jin/ Satan…
The Apostles' and Nicene Creeds do not they imply that Jesus survived the crucifixion, which you correctly identified as the Muslim view. The creeds deny this Muslim view, contrary to your claim.