It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Toltec
The policy of the US is simple, do anything which can be compared to events at Pearl Harbor and the American people will be more than happy to support the application of nuclear weapons.
If you have a problem with that make sure you do nothing the American public can consider similar in
any ways, shape, or form.
Dom as far as international policy prior to 40 years ago who would you define as the country most others felt was doing the wrong thing?
If you have any questions look out your window.
The United States did not demand this responsibility it was asked and if you are uncertain by whom, pick up a history book. You will find the name Churchill under the topic of who asked the US to take the initiative.
Let get something strait for the last 30/40 years the US has had to deal with the crap. The so-called older nations have seen fit to treat as secondary to their interest when they were empires.
The War on Terror is basically a response to how tired the US is of wiping the European Bottom given what in fact are the problems of the world today.
Originally posted by TigeriS
When will you people stop foooooling your self by saying that oil is not the main motive ?
Originally posted by CoLD aNGeR
Originally posted by Toltec
The policy of the US is simple, do anything which can be compared to events at Pearl Harbor and the American people will be more than happy to support the application of nuclear weapons.
If you have a problem with that make sure you do nothing the American public can consider similar in
any ways, shape, or form.
Dom as far as international policy prior to 40 years ago who would you define as the country most others felt was doing the wrong thing?
If you have any questions look out your window.
The United States did not demand this responsibility it was asked and if you are uncertain by whom, pick up a history book. You will find the name Churchill under the topic of who asked the US to take the initiative.
Let get something strait for the last 30/40 years the US has had to deal with the crap. The so-called older nations have seen fit to treat as secondary to their interest when they were empires.
The War on Terror is basically a response to how tired the US is of wiping the European Bottom given what in fact are the problems of the world today.
As far as i can see u defend the politics of your country, understand them and agree with them, did i get it right?
Because i still don�t see any rationalism in defend this atrocity or try to look for excuses or rivalry between countries...
Please explain a bit yourself (remember we talk about the article)
Originally posted by Leveller
Originally posted by TigeriS
When will you people stop foooooling your self by saying that oil is not the main motive ?
Stop fooling yourself that it is, dude.
The invasion of Iraq and importanty, Saddams lightning defeat has lots of fallout.
Oil is in there but not as a major reason. It's a byproduct.
The war was a step in creating a New World Order.
Originally posted by Leveller
You want proof?
Look at the world around you.
Look at the evolution of different societies and organisations. Look at previous conflicts. Look at politics. Look at technology.
Then look at something that is staring you straight in the face. Look at something that the West runs. Look at it's policies. Look at it's actions. Look at it's aims and goals. Look at how it has adapted and changed. LOOK AT HOW AND WHY IT WAS SET UP!!!
Look at this: www.un.org
This organisation has never hidden. It has merely confused. But this is the tool that the NWO will use to reshape the world.
If you look hard enough, the proof is there for you to see.