It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by HumAnnunaki
They are very real, the blueprints, and I have no doubt that ATS will be viewing
them in the very near future.
Originally posted by solve
reply to post by HumAnnunaki
One might find the real blueprints from my signature...
Originally posted by HumAnnunaki
There is no actual factual history that is known and widely accepted as to whom
actuallly built these monumental magnificent works of architecture.
Our understanding of the builders comes from those whom live in the region
whom claim to be the original builders but as of yet they have not proved any
evidence other than hear say from what amounts to those who have claimed
a "squatters rights" status.
Suppose the original builders left the blueprints to be found and that it proves
without a shadow of a doubt that the Egyptians of our timeline in our present day history DID NOT infact build the pyramids.
That it proves that an ancient Atlantean type civilization did indeed build them
..or they were possibly built by a Extra Terrestrial civilization that once inhabited our mother Earth.
Suppose all that I have said is true and can be proven - What does that do to humanity?
Or if by back engineering the pyramid's blueprints we found hidden chambers
explaining our hidden history or some technological find such as the Ark of the Covenant.
Suppose the blueprints show us something amazing..like clues to the where abouts of
the ancient fabled Hall of Records...
..and what if they are just that... ..only blueprints? Are they still valuable?
It also proves that there were no Jewish slaves involved.
Yes - no Jewish decendants were harmed in the making ot the Giza pyramids!
Do those incharge of our present day world embrace this new find?
Is it more possible that the PTB will do everything possible to hide and bury
the facts and supress the evidence?
Does the find disrupt humanity causing world wide chaos or does the world
say 'cool' and move on with their everyday mundane lives?
How does one bring this knowledge to the forefront of modern society without
it being sequestered and the finder of the blueprints mysteriously dieing of some
rare disease or an untimely accident involving said blueprint finder causing death?
Originally posted by HomerinNC
If I remember reading correctly, Khufu's name was allegedly carved by Lord Richard William Howard Vyse and proven to be a fraud
Originally posted by Byrd
It'd have to explain the other pyramids (with some similar features) that are older than the Giza pyramids.
Originally posted by Byrd
Originally posted by HomerinNC
If I remember reading correctly, Khufu's name was allegedly carved by Lord Richard William Howard Vyse and proven to be a fraud
Nope... seems to be genuine, and confirmed by other markings on blocks deeper in the pyramid.
It is clear to see that apart from Piazzi Smyth (and possibly Proctor), the dates for the creation of the pyramid are all considerably earlier than modern Egyptologists claim. This is not due to a lack of science or rigor; On the contrary, the Radio-carbon dating at Giza supports the idea that the Great pyramid was built long before it is currently claimed by Egyptologists.
The Great pyramid - When was it Built
The three major pyramids at Giza are completely devoid of Egyptian hieroglyphs inside and out and there has been no evidence of any Pharaoh ever being laid to rest in any of them. This is very significant because the three Pyramids along the Giza Plateau initially had nothing to do with the Egyptians. They were designed by Noah’s grandfather, Enoch, a man who walked with YHWH (Genesis 5:24). The Great Pyramid was originally called “The Pillar of Enoch.” The Pillar of Enoch was built with supernatural knowledge that was handed down to Enoch
Pyramids and the Egyptians
Pharaoh Khufu himself left no indication whatsoever that he built the Great Pyramid of Giza. He did, however, claim to have done repair work on the structure. On the nearby "Inventory" Stele (dating to about 1500 BC, but showing evidence of having been copied from a far older stele contemporaneous with the fourth dynasty)
Regarding the red ochre paint marks found within the pyramid, most hieroglyph experts now believe these to be forgeries left by their "discoverer" Richard Howard-Vyse, rather than being quarry inscriptions left by the original builders. Howard-Vyse was under pressure to equal the discoveries of his rival, the Italian explorer Caviglia, who had found inscriptions in some of the tombs around the Great Pyramid.
Modern researchers now suspect that, in the battle for one-upmanship, Howard-Vyse sought to overshadow his rival and gain renewed support for his own projects with a similar but more spectacular "discovery", by forging quarry inscriptions inside the Great Pyramid. In other words, no firm evidence in any way connects the pyramids of the Giza plateau to the dynastic Egyptians.
sacredsites.com...
Originally posted by Rob7774
I wonder sometimes why people feel the need to denigrate the marvels that our ancient ancestors achieved. As though for some reason they were too thick to come up with something like the Pyramids on thier own.
The truth is that the ancients Egyptians possessed IQ's just as lofty as ones we see today. They just hadn't invented all the things yet. They had the mathematics and the engineering skills and the man power. That is all you need.