It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LesMisanthrope
I will respond to each and every post in depth, but first need to find the time to do so. Thanks for the interest.
So, LesMisanthrope, is the materialist who recognizes that the body-mind is a single whole, also obliged to feel and act as the whole body-mind?
Isn't everything short of such whole-bodily recognizing, feeling, and acting another form of idealism that tends to separate the body-mind into disparate, even conflicting parts, and potentially breeding further idealism?
As I have made clear modern science has no claim to fame with respect to consciousness or for that matter the issue of Psi. In respect to the latter, science has failed to actually test individuals and in consideration to the actual purges that occurred in the recent past. To imply something is false without proper testing of at least a segment of the population that was not effected. By mass murder in respect to the possibility they were psychic is in no way shape or form a valid scientific investigation.
This is an example of the Materialist insult, the idea that science does not have an obligation to investigate any phenomenon a majority of the people on this planet claim as valid.
Materialism is the BELIEF / DOCTRINE that nothing exists except for physical stuff.
This is like saying "I do not believe in things I don't experience in my own life"...
But just because you don't experience something (non-physical) that doesn't mean it doesn't exist...
Now , if you want to ask for "proof" or "evidence" and it doesn't show up - that just means that non-physical wasn't experienced BY YOU but it doesn't mean it doesn't exist...
I can ask for many things and experiences, but just because I don't get them that doesn't mean they don't exist.
I mean I noticed you responded to another thread; could you not used that time to respond to this one as you said you were going to do???
Originally posted by LesMisanthrope
For something to be considered a phenomena, it must first be a fact or situation that is observed to exist or happen. The scientific method requires existing things and phenomena in order to observe them demonstratively. Someone simply making claims of such non-phenomena and not being able to reproduce it under observation is suspect to say the least.
In order for anything to be investigated by "science", it must first be capable of being investigated. People telling stories isn't going to cut it.
Well... did anyone actually experience a pink elephant orbiting Jupiter? Because if they did, how can it not be true?
awareness |əˈwe(ə)rnis|
noun
knowledge or perception of a situation or fact: we need to raise public awareness of the issue. there is a lack of awareness of the risks.
• concern about and well-informed interest in a particular situation or development: a growing environmental awareness. his political awareness developed.
For 'things' to be investigated they have to be 'observed'. The appearance has to be seen?
Can you see the seer? The 'thingness' is seen by what?
Is the 'seer' a phenomenon'?
So, LesMisanthrope, is the materialist who recognizes that the body-mind is a single whole, also obliged to feel and act as the whole body-mind?
Isn't everything short of such whole-bodily recognizing, feeling, and acting another form of idealism that tends to separate the body-mind into disparate, even conflicting parts, and potentially breeding further idealism?
Originally posted by LesMisanthrope
The beauty is that everyone already acts as the whole “body/mind” by default. The idealizing begins when we don’t want to accept this, and wish to believe, perhaps out of instinct, that we are somehow more than what we already are.
Originally posted by LesMisanthrope
reply to post by arpgme
Name one thing that is known to exist that hasn't been first experienced sensually or measured?
Originally posted by LesMisanthrope
reply to post by Itisnowagain
For 'things' to be investigated they have to be 'observed'. The appearance has to be seen?
Can you see the seer? The 'thingness' is seen by what?
Is the 'seer' a phenomenon'?
The human organism is a thing and a phenomenon. It can see itself.
Feeling as the whole body-mind, from head to toe, integrates mind and body into a conscious whole beyond such conceptualization. However, we tend to not feel whole bodily because we identify with the thinking process, with the process of abstracting from the actual whole body-mind - most people call this "I" or "me". This is a form of idealism because this "I" does not actually exist as an entity, and more importantly is NOT conscious feeling as the whole body-mind.
But what is your experience when you simply are feeling/being the singular whole body-mind altogether?