It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"I think the approach of the Federal Government should be simple: We should focus on deterring and punishing violent criminals. It's violent criminals that commit these crimes, that's where our target should be. At the same time, we should be safeguarding the constitutional rights of lawful, peaceful citizens."
Originally posted by eXia7
reply to post by IAMTAT
If Obama really cared for children, he would find a way to stop inner city gang violence, considering that's what most of the crime is about. Pretty funny he claims his love for Chicago, but it's still riddled with inner city violence.
edit on 4/11/2013 by eXia7 because: (no reason given)
A law enforcement website with more than 1.5 million unique visitors per month and 400,000 registered members, PoliceOne asked more than 15,000 verified active and retired law enforcement personnel more than 20 questions about how they believe stricter gun control will impact the community.
The participants were spread out across the country, and about 80 percent were current law enforcement, 20 percent former/retired.
Here are some of the results of the survey, which was conducted between March 4 and March 13:
Nearly 96 percent said that a ban on standard capacity magazines with more than 10 rounds would not reduce violent crime.
More than 81 percent said that “gun buy-backs” do not reduce gun violence.
Nearly 80 percent said that a ban on private transfers of firearms between law-abiding citizens would not reduce violent crime.
71 percent said that a ban on “assault weapons” would have no impact on reducing violent crime.
20.5 percent said it would actually have a negative impact.
More than 70 percent opposed the idea of a national database of legal gun sales.
Nearly 68 percent said magazine capacity restrictions would negatively affect them personally.
More than 60 percent said that the passage of Obama’s gun control legislation would do nothing to improve officer safety.
Nearly 25 percent said it would actually have a negative impact.
Originally posted by jibeho
reply to post by IAMTAT
It is the NRA's fault that they only prosecuted 44.
Just wanted to get that out in the open before the usual suspects insert it into this thread....
His administration has been historically week on this issue and out of 90 federal districts, Chicago ranked dead last in the enforcement of these laws. Wonder why?
Originally posted by sensfan
Just because you fail a background check doesn't mean you have reason to be prosecuted....what is wrong with you people. If someone is an EX-con, they fail the background check, but it's not a crime to apply. If someone is a foreigner and not a legal citizen, they fail the check, but they haven't done anything wrong.
Jeez, next you will be wanting everyone that fails their drivers test to e prosecuted.
Why are you afraid of universal background checks? If you are legally able to own a gun, you will pass it.
What a country you have there. Sheesh.
Effectively combating violent crime also demands that – with the help and leadership of our U.S. Attorneys’ Offices, as well as the FBI, ATF, DEA, and Marshals Service – we continue to crack down on the gang-, gun-, and drug-fueled violence that menaces our streets and threatens our communities. Through intelligence-driven, threat-based prosecutions – we will focus on dismantling criminal organizations and putting them out of business for good. In so doing, we will fight to keep guns out of the hands of criminals and those who are not lawfully allowed to possess them." - Attorney General Eric Holder, April 25, 2011
Originally posted by jibeho
reply to post by IAMTAT
It is the NRA's fault that they only prosecuted 44.
Just wanted to get that out in the open before the usual suspects insert it into this thread....
His administration has been historically week on this issue and out of 90 federal districts, Chicago ranked dead last in the enforcement of these laws. Wonder why?
Originally posted by HomerinNC
Lets give credit where credits due: the local judicial system is the ones prosecuting the felons with firearms, not the fed govt, Fox News and the senator didn't point that out. I see more stories in my local news paper about felons getting caught and the state level charging them, so it's not like they're not being prosecuted, it's just done at a different level
Title 18, United States Code, Section 922(g)(1). The offense is a felony. The law provides the following:
It shall be unlawful for any person-
(1) who has been convicted in any court of, a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year;
***
to ship or transport in interstate or foreign commerce, or possess in or affecting commerce, any firearm or ammunition; or to receive any firearm or ammunition which has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce