It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NeuronDivide
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
Artists make money on digital music sales, concert tickets and merchandising royalties. If you are signed by a major label, you're making money.
Not really... While it's true that artists now have to tour and sell merch to make any money, once you give the manager+booking agent+promoters+publicist their cut and pay for flights+car hire+accom there's really nothing left over.
Originally posted by mysterioustranger
A registered copyright owner of many songs and several books...I have only a single point to make. I and the group, and the arranger perhaps...get to split by percentage anywhere from $350 per quarter to as much as $5000 on another quarter, then the next? Maybe nothing. Next year? Maybe nothing. (we go thru trends in our music and are getting Internationally paid royalties)
I take neither side ( I can see both) but want to explain that out of all those sharing and not buying....I could be getting that income. (And no need to try and convince me sales are stimulated by sharing.) Simply...that which is not bought....could have been, and the money going to the registered copyright owner (s).
I get no money...and certainly not more....when music is shared...and I couldve been receiving royalties.
No discussion back and forth please....I have yet to see any contributor to any of these threads acknowledge to be a registered copyright owner.... Most opinions on this subject I see are made from those of you who are outside the industry, not in. I am, so Ive made my point.
Originally posted by thedigirati
yes I DID know that, I know a lot more then you think so why would you get paid over and over for work you did ONE time??
Like I said why are YOU special, I noticed you did NOT answer that question. you can always get a "real" job
your name is not out_of_ the_blue on another website perchance is it??edit on 12-4-2013 by thedigirati because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by thedigirati
reply to post by TarzanBeta
a "real" job makes a real product, one you can take away and never get back, IP is not a real product as in real estate.
Originally posted by thedigirati
the issue I have is not so much with royalties as much as the companies that are not paying them, or that they are using the monies for making BAD LAWS, at the expense of MY RIGHTS.
Do I think artists should get royalties, sure, bot not for "Life of the author, plus 75 years" anything you or I create cannot be used by anyone or put in the public domain during the lifetime of the customer (fan) that is not fair. you could make one song/movie/picture and never have incentive to create again, that is the Opposite of what copyright was intended.
don't you think 25 years is long enough to get paid for a piece of work? Why should my grandkids get monies for MY work? ( what of I don't like them?)
what happens if the company that owns your copyright goes bankrupt thru mismanagement ? what happens to your royalties then?
why shouldn't the artist just get an upfront flat fee? whats wrong with that?
remember "art for arts sake" I've never seen nor heard of "art for profits sake" (but I sure have seen a lot of music and movies like that)