What is the difference between a bailout for banks and a bailout for people? If the government is going to do one, why not do the other? This is why
the government should ideally do neither.
Churches have taken care of the needy for many centuries. Orphans, Poor, Sick, Homeless in most of the world are still taken care of by tithing from
churches. Regardless of religious affiliation the needy and elderly were taken care of. Even the Bible talks about taking care of widows and orphans.
Churches have always been able to do this, the first time churches in America failed to take care of the needy was during the Great Depression, 17
years after the Federal Reserve was created. This is no coincidence. No other panic/ recession/depression caused churches to become so overwhelmed by
the needy. Central banks should be destroyed in all nations around the globe.
unemployment & disability insurance, takes care of you getting hurt, sick, or laid off. Just like life insurance, you pay for
it as you work. As long as you pay for your insurance, you can collect benefits, provided you get the broadest coverage. The government can decide on
a whim that it will no longer provide benefits it made you dependent on.
European governments have given their citizens welfare only to take it away when the bills pile up. The problem with needing the government is that
they can change their mind or switch leaders. Encouraging reliance on the government is foolish. I feel sorry for anyone across the pond who expects
things to change. When someone controls the purse strings they control YOU, which was what they wanted all along. Get some balls.
America imported this welfare system right from Europe. But America wasn't founded on these ideas at all. Sadly we inherited the same ridiculous ideas
that will bring us to ruin.
I say this to say that:
1. Having a broke government is dangerous and easier to destroy
2. Being free from such a system is better than being a slave to it
3. Having your money not taxed highly is better than being taxed and not having any say with when/IF you get it back
You may not agree with what I have to say, but 70 years of Welfare has proven that it is a dangerous tool to keep the population under the control of
edit on 4/12/2013 by INDOMITABLE because: (no reason given)