It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by eXia7
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Originally posted by zonetripper2065
reply to post by MysteriousHusky
The man thinks he is above us. So we will call him King Obama. He had a chance to be the best president that we've ever had and instead he does this bullsh*t.
what BS in specific?
What exactly...technically..do you object to?
The invasion of Libya comes to mind.
who needs congress anyway, certainly not Mr. Executive Order
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Originally posted by eXia7
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Originally posted by zonetripper2065
reply to post by MysteriousHusky
The man thinks he is above us. So we will call him King Obama. He had a chance to be the best president that we've ever had and instead he does this bullsh*t.
what BS in specific?
What exactly...technically..do you object to?
The invasion of Libya comes to mind.
who needs congress anyway, certainly not Mr. Executive Order
This thread isn't about the UN sponsored no fly zone enforcement of Libya...this is about background checks for people wanting guns..you know.."this bull----" as you stated..this meaning this..not this meaning something else.
You stated it, just asking for clarification.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Originally posted by sonnny1
Originally posted by MysteriousHusky
king Obama
Firstly, cut the guy some slack. ]
No.
He's the President . He's also the same guy who pushes his own ideals on the American public at the cost of the American public. He gets No slack. The cult of personality comes with a price.
Agreed entirely. He also gets the credit or blame here, depending on one's side, based on something else. Bush was pro-gun. As Pro-gun as it came. He was accused...repeatedly...of being in the back pocket of the NRA in fact. You don't get much further than that. By contrast, Obama has been loud, clear and on the record for his very strong feelings against guns going many years beyond the time he first came to notice as a national candidate of anything.
Therefore, the contrast and most obvious source of the sea change in national policy direction is self evident. CT isn't new ..sadly...or unusual over the long term outlook. Tragic as that is to admit. The reaction is all that came as a radical departure. So....to the leader go the accolades ...or condemnation. I think my position is fairly well known without having to elaborate on which.
* By the way, I wonder how many people recognize your Avatar (Brando) in terms of which movie and which part of that movie it came from? Nice choice! (Kinda sad...kinda mad ...and a little pinch of Brando, wasn't it?)
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
Does it really matter how many guns he "sells" when they are getting lists of all the people who want/buy guns? You know those lists are not going away.
If the conspiracy was that the Obama admin wanted to enforce existing laws, then sure..but not much of a conspiracy, is it...nor is it some dark looming shot across the bow. the NRAs biggest line has always been we don't need more laws, we need to enforce the ones on the books now...so, ok..the ones on the books are being enforced.. whats the issue?
The "right to drive is, as often claimed, only a "privilege". The RIGHT to keep and bare arms is enshrined in the Constitution and shall not be infringed.
Originally posted by phishyblankwaters
You need a license to drive. That's regulated, you have to actually pass a competency test before you can do it legally, once you do... GASP. the government slaps your photo on a little plastic card that you have to carry around incase someone asks for your "papers", damn commies. Then, GASP, they actually keep a record of what type of vehicle, down to the license plate (they provide) and track it, knowing who has what.
My god, someone must stop the tyranny.
The point is, 70+ million people attempting to purchase firearms, especially since Obama took office is staggering, and I believe that people don't have faith in the admin.
Originally posted by eXia7
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Originally posted by eXia7
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Originally posted by zonetripper2065
reply to post by MysteriousHusky
The man thinks he is above us. So we will call him King Obama. He had a chance to be the best president that we've ever had and instead he does this bullsh*t.
what BS in specific?
What exactly...technically..do you object to?
The invasion of Libya comes to mind.
who needs congress anyway, certainly not Mr. Executive Order
This thread isn't about the UN sponsored no fly zone enforcement of Libya...this is about background checks for people wanting guns..you know.."this bull----" as you stated..this meaning this..not this meaning something else.
You stated it, just asking for clarification.
Yeah, I'm not the guy that was directed at, But either way, we all know Obama is a UN lapdog..
The point is, 70+ million people attempting to purchase firearms, especially since Obama took office is staggering, and I believe that people don't have faith in the admin.edit on 4/10/2013 by eXia7 because: (no reason given)
the topic still remains, how is making sure background checks are done efficiently = tyranny. People buying a lot of guns based on pretend doom porn is nothing new. happens under every dem president, yet the only major policy changes and bans happens under republican presidents (see Nixon and Reagan). what can ya say...33% of the US are easily swayed by rumor and innuendo
Originally posted by eXia7
there is no reason Obama and his admin need to tout around children and pretend to cry about gun violence in America, then at the same time orders drone strikes that end up killing children.
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Originally posted by eXia7
there is no reason Obama and his admin need to tout around children and pretend to cry about gun violence in America, then at the same time orders drone strikes that end up killing children.
That's like saying we shouldn't help out starving people, because we bomb people that are also possibly starving in different lands.
invalid argument.
Originally posted by eXia7
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Originally posted by eXia7
there is no reason Obama and his admin need to tout around children and pretend to cry about gun violence in America, then at the same time orders drone strikes that end up killing children.
That's like saying we shouldn't help out starving people, because we bomb people that are also possibly starving in different lands.
invalid argument.
So it's okay to put a face on the tragedy that happens here at home, but we can ignore all of the other injustices being conducted by the US to others, just as long as it's not being shown to us on the TV, right?
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Originally posted by eXia7
So people say that Obama is the greatest gun salesman yet, now we're up to almost 70.3 million background checks under king Obama. This tells me that Americans are firm in their stance against what this administration is trying to pull off. Now, we'll get the critics and nay-sayers that will just call us all paranoid conspiracy theorists.
If the conspiracy was that the Obama admin wanted to enforce existing laws, then sure..but not much of a conspiracy, is it...nor is it some dark looming shot across the bow.
the NRAs biggest line has always been we don't need more laws, we need to enforce the ones on the books now...so, ok..the ones on the books are being enforced..
whats the issue?