It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DrHammondStoat
reply to post by Afterthought
I know, I find the 'It was the 70s' excuse really odd.
Originally posted by DrHammondStoat
reply to post by something wicked
I suppose with the Rob Brydon example, you would have to question how well he actually knew Savile. Was it just a case of 'do charity event and go?' I would expect so and I wouldn't expect Brydon to know...... but Thatcher spent 11 Christmases with the feller! He was also allowed a free run of Buck Palace and asked for advice when appointing advisers to Charles and Di, which has sinced been downplayed by the palace.
Originally posted by TrainDispatcher
I seen this from elsewhere about MT.
"3 million pounds for the funeral of Margaret Thatcher?
For 3 million you could give everyone in Scotland a shovel, and we could dig a hole so deep we could hand her over to Satan in person."
Originally posted by muse7
It amazes me as well the amount of people that are worshiping this witch just because she died.
Originally posted by Afterthought
UK citizens need to demand that Edwina Currie be brought up on charges immediately and have her guilt or innocence put on trial!
Sure, this info is coming from David Icke's website, but he's already proven that he was right about SoVILE.
"Thatcher government minister Edwina Currie writing about the Thatcher inner-circle paedophile Peter Morrison"
Thatcher didn’t know? Are you having a laugh? Clearly everyone knew, including many in the media, and what was that Currie said about Chester MP Morrison? – He admitted as much when he became deputy chairman of the party, but said he was very discreet??
Originally posted by armed2teeth
This is pretty sick. But when you realize that the media elite/men behind the current are all into pedophaellia due to sex magik, it makes sense
His contract with the BBC was terminated in August 1990 thanks to a political row, when he refused to pay his Community Charge, a controversial local tax introduced that year in England by Margaret Thatcher. He did end up paying it, but his announcement that he was willing to go to jail rather than pay prompted the BBC, by charter an impartial public-service broadcaster, to distance itself from him.[
This argument is making absolutely no sense. It's built on false claims in the OP suggesting it was "established", and now others are suggesting that the power of the state should be monitoring random TV presenters, and that if they're not they are guilty of something?
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
My response to your question will come in the form of another question, please forgive me if it seems like I am being a "smart ass" as it's not my intention, but how could they not have known?edit on 4/10/2013 by Corruption Exposed because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by teapot
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
Thanks for the info. Always wondered how Thatcher got party leadership. Had a lot of gumph on them did she?
Originally posted by illuminnaughty
As Prime Minister she should have known. Her security should have known, after all that is their job. Which we the people pay them to do. The police knew with out a doubt since at least 1963. The BBC knew as they broad cast it on live tell lie vision. MI5 vetted all BBC staff they had an office in the basement, so they knew. Now none of these people told maggie? I find it very hard to understand how she could not have known about Sir jimmy so VILE savil.