CNN Shows Thatcher Accepting Donation From Jimmy Saville for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children

page: 1
111
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
+95 more 
posted on Apr, 10 2013 @ 09:39 AM
link   
CNN and all the other outlets never fail to amaze me. While paying tribute to "Baroness Thatcher" they somehow managed to post a picture of Thatcher accepting a donation from Jimmy Saville to the "National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children".


CNN was attacked last night for broadcasting a picture of Baroness Thatcher with paedophile Jimmy Savile in its coverage of the former prime minister’s death.

The U.S. broadcaster used an image from February 1980 of the disgraced BBC DJ presenting her with a cheque for £10,000 in aid of the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children.

Global TV networks broadcasted tributes yesterday to Lady Thatcher, who died aged 87 following a stroke in bed at the Ritz Hotel in central London, where she had been staying since after Christmas.



www.dailymail.co.uk...


I have seen several threads about Thatcher since her passing and I was amazed at how many members worshipped this woman. Yes, there were far worse people than her but she was part of the overall problem with today's society. Elitists who are falsely portrayed by the media deserve no sympathy in my books. I am not from the UK but it has been established that Jimmy Saville's sick perversions were known about by the British elite for quite some time and it has been speculated that many of them were even in on it, and for Thatcher to accept this donation from Saville just shows how twisted things really are (not that we didn't know already).

Members have pointed out that she had this man over for Christmas dinner various times and I doubt she was innocently "out of the loop" as others in other threads have suggested.

Flame me all you want for bringing this up but I believe that you should be remembered for how you lived, and the more I find out about this woman the more I am glad she is no longer "blessing" us with her presence...I will leave it at that in reference to "Baroness" Thatcher.

This CNN blooper would be funny if it wasn't so sickening and is another perfect example of the media's complicity in the attempts to brainwash people into believing absolute nonsense.

Part of me wants to think that this is some type of sick joke, I know a lot of these media outlets are not that bright, but can they really be this stupid? I am starting to believe they may have actually done this on purpose...as for why they would do this on purpose, I do not have an explanation, only speculations.
edit on 4/10/2013 by Corruption Exposed because: (no reason given)




posted on Apr, 10 2013 @ 09:53 AM
link   
reply to post by Corruption Exposed
 


That's hilarious, but what do you expect? The news does absolutely zero research into anything the report these days.



posted on Apr, 10 2013 @ 10:33 AM
link   

Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
it has been established that Jimmy Saville's sick perversions were known about by the British elite for quite some time and it has been speculated that many of them were even in on it, and for Thatcher to accept this donation from Saville just shows how twisted things really are (not that we didn't know already).


This is where you completely fail.
It absolutely hasn't been established that the "elite" of the UK were aware of this man's perversions! There are suggestions from others in the BBC at the time that it was known that he was a sexist pig, but even those in the BBC have never had any evidence that he was a child molester. It's only after those victims have come forward that people within the BBC have actually put things together and considered that those rumours of inappropriate behaviour were possibly true.

You're fictionalizing history to suit your hatred of this woman, and it's completely unjustified.

I expect it to a degree, because all the socialists in the UK are doing exactly the same on everything else too, holding parties and preaching about all the terrible things she did to them (even though 80% of them were not even alive when she was in power) and completely ignore the truth about how this country was BEFORE she kicked the unions in the nads and fixed this country.



posted on Apr, 10 2013 @ 10:36 AM
link   
The famously non-pedophilic Lord McAlpine used to go over for Xmas too. I can't imagine what him and Jimmy would have had to say to each other, him being non-kiddie fiddling inclined, and Jimmy being his polar opposite. Apparently, Macca didn't even like pop music, so there's another thing they wouldn't have talked about.


+41 more 
posted on Apr, 10 2013 @ 10:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by Rocker2013

Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
it has been established that Jimmy Saville's sick perversions were known about by the British elite for quite some time and it has been speculated that many of them were even in on it, and for Thatcher to accept this donation from Saville just shows how twisted things really are (not that we didn't know already).


This is where you completely fail.
It absolutely hasn't been established that the "elite" of the UK were aware of this man's perversions! There are suggestions from others in the BBC at the time that it was known that he was a sexist pig, but even those in the BBC have never had any evidence that he was a child molester. It's only after those victims have come forward that people within the BBC have actually put things together and considered that those rumours of inappropriate behaviour were possibly true.


Oh, and you obviously know better, being that you were among their circle when they weren't in the public glare? If she didn't know about it, it doesn't say much for the intelligence services she was supposed to have at her beck and call.


+34 more 
posted on Apr, 10 2013 @ 10:40 AM
link   
reply to post by Rocker2013
 




This is where you completely fail.


That is your opionion based on your own biased assumptions.

Thanks for sharing though




It absolutely hasn't been established that the "elite" of the UK were aware of this man's perversions!


Are you saying with 100% certainty that thet "elite" of the UK were unaware of this man's actions?



You're fictionalizing history to suit your hatred of this woman, and it's completely unjustified.


Well, what have I fictualized? Also, I never said I hated her, but I do very much dislike her, and it is completely justified.

Thanks for your opinion
edit on 4/10/2013 by Corruption Exposed because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 10 2013 @ 10:46 AM
link   

Originally posted by Corruption Exposed

Are you saying with 100% certainty that thet "elite" of the UK were unaware of this man's actions?


Please don't try to change the meaning of my words, you know exactly what I am saying.

You stated that it has been "established" and you are factually incorrect. You are lying in your post, making up history, fictionalizing, to support your own argument. That is what I am saying.



posted on Apr, 10 2013 @ 10:48 AM
link   

Originally posted by IvanAstikov

Originally posted by Rocker2013

Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
it has been established that Jimmy Saville's sick perversions were known about by the British elite for quite some time and it has been speculated that many of them were even in on it, and for Thatcher to accept this donation from Saville just shows how twisted things really are (not that we didn't know already).


This is where you completely fail.
It absolutely hasn't been established that the "elite" of the UK were aware of this man's perversions! There are suggestions from others in the BBC at the time that it was known that he was a sexist pig, but even those in the BBC have never had any evidence that he was a child molester. It's only after those victims have come forward that people within the BBC have actually put things together and considered that those rumours of inappropriate behaviour were possibly true.


Oh, and you obviously know better, being that you were among their circle when they weren't in the public glare? If she didn't know about it, it doesn't say much for the intelligence services she was supposed to have at her beck and call.


So you think that a government should be following and monitoring celebrities? Why on Earth would her government have had their intelligence services watching a TV presenter?

This argument is making absolutely no sense. It's built on false claims in the OP suggesting it was "established", and now others are suggesting that the power of the state should be monitoring random TV presenters, and that if they're not they are guilty of something?

Ridiculous.



posted on Apr, 10 2013 @ 10:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by Rocker2013

Originally posted by Corruption Exposed

Are you saying with 100% certainty that thet "elite" of the UK were unaware of this man's actions?


Please don't try to change the meaning of my words, you know exactly what I am saying.

You stated that it has been "established" and you are factually incorrect. You are lying in your post, making up history, fictionalizing, to support your own argument. That is what I am saying.


I was not trying to change the meaning of your words, that is another assumption on your behalf. Perhaps we have had a misunderstanding and you can elaborate for me.

From what I have come across since the Saville saga became public, it is very safe to say that various circles among the elite were in fact very aware of his perversions. I am not even from the UK and am aware of this, I am assuming you are from the UK (please forgive my assumption if it is incorrect) so perhaps you can set me straight because it seems to me you that are afraid to admit that your elected officials among other people that were in the "in crowd" are a bunch of greedy psychopaths who have a taste for children.
edit on 4/10/2013 by Corruption Exposed because: (no reason given)


+2 more 
posted on Apr, 10 2013 @ 10:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by Rocker2013
So you think that a government should be following and monitoring celebrities? Why on Earth would her government have had their intelligence services watching a TV presenter?

Erm... because he was spending cosy time with the leader of the nation? Saville was suspected of being a nonce by most of the north west as early as the late 70's, and they knew it was only a matter of time before it became common knowledge. Jerry Sadowitz was informing anyone at his shows in '87 that Saville was an evil pos. There was plenty of smoke to warrant investigation of something burning, had they been interested to do so back then.


+1 more 
posted on Apr, 10 2013 @ 10:58 AM
link   
Well i suppose she defiled our country, and he defiled our countries children. That much they do have in common.
Oh and the same hairstyle.



posted on Apr, 10 2013 @ 11:07 AM
link   
In all fairness,how could she possibly have known?


+1 more 
posted on Apr, 10 2013 @ 11:18 AM
link   
reply to post by Corruption Exposed
 

Hey, CE. Thanks for bringing this forward. It needed it's own thread.
I was one of those in the Thatcher threads that was posting info about her suspected involvement, but most did act as though it was the least of things they were concerned about. Makes me ill to know that so many people are capable of dismissing her being buddies with SoVILE.
Ostriches!

Those other threads proved to me more than anything I've ever seen that people are more concerned about the economy and wealth than victims of childhood sexual abuse.
The bit--, er, sorry, Maggie should've been investigated because there's more than enough evidence suggesting that she knew a whole lot more about Jimmy and the sex ring than meets the eye.
After all, do we even know yet who said ol' Jim could have keys to those hospitals so he could go in and satiate his disgusting self in the middle of the night? Couldn't have been Thatcher who gave the OK on that one, could it?

If Britain keeps sticking their heads in the sand about this paedo ring, they're on their way to being known as the country with the most sex abuse victims who never got to see justice because everyone just waited around for the guilty parties to kick the bucket.
Shame on all those who are preferring to turn your back on this!



posted on Apr, 10 2013 @ 11:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by Raxoxane
In all fairness,how could she possibly have known?


Yeah.
Just like Sandusky's wife, right?



posted on Apr, 10 2013 @ 11:23 AM
link   
reply to post by Raxoxane
 


How many other tv presenters stayed with the Thatcher's over Xmas? I'm guessing not many. I'd expect anyone who might be invited to spend time with them to have been vetted thoroughly by the PM's security team and they only had to scratch the surface to find dirt on Saville.



posted on Apr, 10 2013 @ 11:23 AM
link   
reply to post by Rocker2013
 


So you think that a government should be following and monitoring celebrities? Why on Earth would her government have had their intelligence services watching a TV presenter?

So, you think that government agencies shouldn't be monitoring the celebrities when they are giving men like Savile keys to government run children's hospital?
You do know he was put in charge of one of the hospitals, right?
www.telegraph.co.uk...

Edwina Currie today defended her decision to allow Jimmy Savile to head up a taskforce driving reforms at Broadmoor hospital where he is accused of sexually assaulting patients.

Savile, despite having no expertise in mental health, was given the job of chairman of the taskforce overseeing Broadmoor in 1988 after the hospital had been placed under direct control of the Thatcher government following a series of strikes.

(emphasis mine)

I wonder how close Thatcher was with this piece of crap Currie?
edit on 10-4-2013 by Afterthought because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 10 2013 @ 11:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by Raxoxane
In all fairness,how could she possibly have known?


My response to your question will come in the form of another question, please forgive me if it seems like I am being a "smart ass" as it's not my intention, but how could they not have known?
edit on 4/10/2013 by Corruption Exposed because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 10 2013 @ 11:36 AM
link   
You'd think CNN would read the news


Oops a daisy CNN

Cody


+4 more 
posted on Apr, 10 2013 @ 11:40 AM
link   
reply to post by IvanAstikov
 


Scratch the surface? Fooking hell it was broadcast live on the BBC`s TOTPs him assaulting a young lady. When she complained they told her to go away. Just like the police told other victims. Go away or we will arrest you. The police knew. The govt knew. MI5/6 knew. The church knew. Royalty should have known as he was Charles`s mentor. He used to run arround the palace in a track suit and trainers. He was on first name terms with them all. Royalty Govt ministers and just about every PM since the 60s.
The only people who didnt know was us the people and of those who did know. They were told to go away.
May she rot in hell for all the damage she did to this country and its people. She was a paedophile enabler who let her ministers and close friends rape our children. I hope her good friend jimmy so VILE savil is with her in hell.



posted on Apr, 10 2013 @ 11:43 AM
link   
UK citizens need to demand that Edwina Currie be brought up on charges immediately and have her guilt or innocence put on trial!
Sure, this info is coming from David Icke's website, but he's already proven that he was right about SoVILE.
www.davidicke.com...
"Thatcher government minister Edwina Currie writing about the Thatcher inner-circle paedophile Peter Morrison"

Thatcher didn’t know? Are you having a laugh? Clearly everyone knew, including many in the media, and what was that Currie said about Chester MP Morrison? – He admitted as much when he became deputy chairman of the party, but said he was very discreet??





 
111
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join