posted on Nov, 3 2004 @ 03:09 AM
I found myself in a position to recieve input on a thread from Netchicken.
While no and I repeat no specific editing was done to content, the format suggestions where made. I am glad they were and they were gladly
implemented. So before I go further understand Netchicken nor ATS influenced the removal or addition of any content, I was allowed to speak and in the
way I wanted, I just made a questionable format error.
It was explained to me that the guidlines of the ATS board indicated that my thread Thread
as previously named and formatted was supposed to be in the political restricted debate forum, but as I explained to Netchicken it
was not a political thread but an anti-war thread as I intended.
So I asked and recieved some clarification as to the difference which distinguished the classification, and I made the changes as a matter of respect
to compliance to board guidlines, and got the thread to a point where open not restricted uses were possible. Despite my original request was
originally granted to restore the thread under the previous uneditted format.
It should be noted however that Netchicken was fair to my appeal and restored it under the understanding it was restored against better
judgement.......I WAS FLABBERGASTED AS TO THE FAIR TREATMENT of
Netchicken, as a member on another board I held membership on this would not ever have happened fairness on the other [nameless outta respect] board
was never something displayed it was their way only.
This fairness is an example of why Above Top Secret is respected by me so much, and why I recommend it to friends. TO ATS ADMINISTRATION I would say
please give net chicken an applause from me. Netchicken you deserve it.
[edit on 3/11/2004 by drbryankkruta]