It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Mnemicrsl
That makes two of us. They have way overstepped their bounds on this one. Its time to revamp the education system and get it out of federal hands.
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by NiteNGale2
don't suppose you could provide any SCOTUS decision that substantiates this statement ?
the SCOTUS had ruled repeatedly that individuals didn't have the right.
and who in their right mind thinks the 'militia' is the National Guard, anyway ?
The Second Amendment was adopted to protect the right of the people of each of the several States to maintain a well-regulated militia. It was a response to concerns raised during the ratification of the Constitution that the power of Congress to disarm the state militias and create a national standing army posed an intolerable threat to the sovereignty of the several States. Neither the text of the Amendment nor the arguments advanced by its proponents evidenced the slightest interest in limiting any legislature’s authority to regulate private civilian uses of firearms. Specifically, there is no indication that the Framers of the Amendment intended to enshrine the common-law right of self-defense in the Constitution.
/double facepalm
Originally posted by links234
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by NiteNGale2
don't suppose you could provide any SCOTUS decision that substantiates this statement ?
the SCOTUS had ruled repeatedly that individuals didn't have the right.
and who in their right mind thinks the 'militia' is the National Guard, anyway ?
The Second Amendment was adopted to protect the right of the people of each of the several States to maintain a well-regulated militia. It was a response to concerns raised during the ratification of the Constitution that the power of Congress to disarm the state militias and create a national standing army posed an intolerable threat to the sovereignty of the several States. Neither the text of the Amendment nor the arguments advanced by its proponents evidenced the slightest interest in limiting any legislature’s authority to regulate private civilian uses of firearms. Specifically, there is no indication that the Framers of the Amendment intended to enshrine the common-law right of self-defense in the Constitution.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER, dissent
It wasn't until the Heller case in 2008 that the government accepted the concept of the individual right to bear arms. Moreover, it wasn't accepted in the general public until the mid-1970's when the NRA became a fierce lobbying organization rather than a gun club.
the people have a right to bear arms for the defence of themselves and the state