Monitoring an exchange between keholmes and kid,
How do we have the right to tell someone who they can love and marry? I think its a shame that so many people are so insecure with themselves that
they voted yes on this
So kidfinger from your response am I to understand you would support NAMBLA, and or pedophilia?
Man, thats just stupid! You know damn good and well that I ment between 2 concenting adults. Are you a sicko? Why would you even bring up a pedophile?
KID, you miss the point and have fallen into the NAMBLA trap that is often misunderstood.
Kehlomes is not a sicko, and is not trying to equate gays to either of these groups, nor promote illegal acts.
The POINT is...which special interest minority group is next to try and force their agenda onto the democratic culture thru devisive means, illegal
tactics, and by demonization of opposition?
The example groups "NAMBLA" and "pedophiles" are used to ask this question because almost 100% of the time EVERYONE aggrees that they are ideals
that our culture should NOT accept into society.
Yet it seems that in the most recent 11 examples of democratic principals being used to accept/reject the gay marriage idea, that it is somehow ok for
the pro gays to use these devisive, illegal (the california case), and demonizating methods to get what they want...
If we wouldnt put up with these tactics from NAMBLA, why would we from ANY special interest minority group including gays?
If using our democracy, NAMBLA was somehow able to manage to get a majority of voters to pass laws favorable to their cause, then like them or not,
we'd have to acknowlege them. (until we could reverse the majority)
RedOct still clinging to lies says,
It's not even really affecting your life.
Red is trying to hide behind the LIE that "noone is being harmed".
Red, how can you even begin to say this logically?
i asked on page ONE of this thread how anyone could say no harm is being done when 11000 things that gay marriage affects havent been
discussed/examined to know where/if harm is occuring. Simply the fact that more couples would suddenly become able to get the marriage tax credit
would drop overall income tax revenue used to support our society...this isnt a direct affect to everyone?
Your suffering from the usual homophobia.. fear of people you don't even know.
Back to devicive name calling as a support tactic? Pathetic.
We are suffering from a special interest minority group, its devicive attacks, its demonization of opposition, its attempted THEFT of our societal
right to cultural self determination either thru outright means (california case) or thru basically saying our culture cant use democracy to determine
which values it wishes to uphold.
Now comming from a self proclaimed SOCIALIST, i understand that you will NEVER say use DEMOCRACY.
Anyone else want to become a socialist, theocracy, dictatorship, communist or any other form of governance here other than the DEMOCRACY we are
founded upon, just see RED. We KNOW his reasons for not supporting democracy he's a socialist.
KayEm tries to get back into the fray by spewing a fallicy...again,
Why some people can't get it in their heads that what other people do in the privacy of their own homes is none of their business is beyond me.
Its very simple, ill try to not use big words here....
Its because when you leave your private bedroom, and go to the courthouse to demmand the culture gives you a special interest minority group
ENTITLEMENT hand out, it becomes a PUBLIC matter. This is NOT the government trying to force its way into your bedroom, its you trying to force your
bedroom onto the government/culture at large.
A democratic society has the right to set its boundaries for acceptable/not acceptable behaivior within its jurisdiction. Unless your ready to toss
out the democracy and adopt socialism like Red...are you?
I cant get it in my head why people think their private bedroom extends to the courthouse steps.