It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You can take out Un and his senior military but in reality you have a country of 10 million people that have been fed anti-US propaganda for decades. I believe a lot of them will still be fighting long after Un is gone.
Originally posted by rickymouse
That is unacceptable, we need more like forty million dead. That will bring down the unemployment rate better and help the economy out.
Just kidding....I think
Pentagon Estimates 250,000 US Dead In A North Korean War,
Originally posted by Cabin
An estimation of 250,000 casualties is likely considering hand-to-hand combat.
Using weapons of mass destruction is highly unlikely due to South Korea being on the same peninsula. Any weapon of mass destruction would lead to consequences on the whole peninsula, including South Korea. Although in the case of North Korea using a weapon of mass destruction on South Korea, it is likely that the response is similar.
North Korea is estimated to have around 6,500,000 soldiers, while South Korean army has up to 12,500,000 soldiers.
When weapons of mass-destruction would not be used, hand-to-hand combat will not be easy due to rough terrain. Although the American-South Korean troops would have a strong advantage in the long run, as North Korea has scarce resources and less advanced technology. It is likely that the war would end in less than 3 months, although both sides will have lots of casualties and 250,000 casualties is likely, although it would be a high estimate.
Originally posted by Gazrok
reply to post by ken10
The army ARE the civilians there, by and large. I'd hope we'd focus more on military assets, Command & Control locations, and focus on the infrastructure used to make war though, than troops.
Originally posted by kurthall
Originally posted by rickymouse
That is unacceptable, we need more like forty million dead. That will bring down the unemployment rate better and help the economy out.
Just kidding....I think
I know I should lighten up but I did not like your comment.
Originally posted by Gazrok
reply to post by ken10
The army ARE the civilians there, by and large. I'd hope we'd focus more on military assets, Command & Control locations, and focus on the infrastructure used to make war though, than troops.
Originally posted by metaldemon2000
reply to post by kurthall
For starters, they are not rushing in there because they have a formidable military force and a war with NK will seriously deplete the US economy. ALso they need to be careful due to the close proximity to Russia and China. One little mistake and its WW3. ALso they need to seriously consider the nuclear capabilities of NK.
Originally posted by sdcigarpig
I don't think that China will allow it to get that far this time, but if it does, they will probably set a perimeter as it did the last time. The first time they told the US and the general in charge (McArthur) not to come within 20 miles of the Yalu river, or it would be considered an act of war. McArthur chose to ignore such, and went up to the Yalu river, and that ultimately prolonged the conflict far too long than it should have been. Ultimately this time again, with the rhetoric starting up, China is setting up its forces and will probably tell the US, SK, and its allies, you can go this far, but beyond that we will get involved. Hopefully it can be avoided.
Originally posted by butcherguy
Casualty estimates are often grossly overestimated by the war planners.
That way, when the war is over, they can say... 'We only lost a tenth of the number of men that we anticipated, look how well we did'.
Originally posted by MrSpad
These estimates are always way over and take into account absolute worst case scenerios. Of course this how right before Desert Storm the Pentagon was predicting 20,000 to 30,000 coaltion dead and ended up 190. So of course the reality comes as a relief and not the other way around. The Pentagon will never come out with low numbers because then they look bad. It is all part of the PR game.