posted on Apr, 10 2013 @ 09:26 PM
reply to post by MUness
That's Courtney Brown's climate change experiment. I've talked to him and a few of the people that participated in the experiment. I have a few
reservations about how the experiment was set up and conducted.
On the surface it sounds ok But I think it was a bit too broad in scope. Also I don't like the timeline A or B options. I think first it need to be
established if Remote viewers can even see a fixed known future event. One of the things that was never looked at extensively at the Standford
research institute was how well RV works at dealing with future events. All of the cases were it has happened have been accidental.
If you look at the 2008 targets that Courtney Browns group did, what was then current day, even they seem to be a bit off. Some were very good but
others seemed to be off target.
I think there should have been a broader range of targets, more inland random targets. There was no fixed "Control group" and the feedback for the
2008 targets should have been more than a target description and a Google earth screen capture.
If someone were to do future RV targets I think they should do a series of calibration targets. Say for example you a know a building is going to be
demolished at a fixed date in the future. The first set of targets is the building as it is in the present. The next set a date after it is to be
demolished. Of course the viewers are blind to both targets but that set up will let you see how accurate they are given a known target.
The future is a messy business. If some one makes a prediction and they are right it will be remembered.
If they are wrong everyone forgets because it's a non event. For example I took a nap this afternoon and had a short dream that I was watching a news
cast. And there was a woman reporter, It was dark outside where she was, and she saying that North Korea had detonated a Nuke, as a test I think. The
big deal was that it was either 20 Kiloton or 20 mega tons, something in the 20's. Either way something way above what they were supposed to be able
Now if that dream comes true, which I hope not, great I had an interesting dream. If not I still had and interesting dream but either way it doesn't
change anything. It's just a random prediction.
edit on 10-4-2013 by mash3d because: spelling