Multiculturalism in the UK has totally failed

page: 5
17
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join

posted on Apr, 9 2013 @ 05:17 AM
link   
reply to post by MrRobertson
 


True, if you look at all the favorite destinations for immigrants they are all inhabited by white people....those who are promoting this want to destroy the white genetic, its obvious!

This video best illustrates the English



edit on 9-4-2013 by LUXUS because: (no reason given)




posted on Apr, 9 2013 @ 05:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by LUXUS
reply to post by MrRobertson
 


True, if you look at all the favorite destinations for immigrants they are all inhabited by white people....those who are promoting this want to destroy the white genetic, its obvious!
edit on 9-4-2013 by LUXUS because: (no reason given)


If it carries on and white people are not allowed to have enough land to maintain and sustain our race then we will be blended out of exhistance It is genocide

I have stared and flaged your OP well done and thanks
edit on 9-4-2013 by MrRobertson because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 9 2013 @ 06:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by LUXUS
reply to post by MrRobertson
 


True, if you look at all the favorite destinations for immigrants they are all inhabited by white people....those who are promoting this want to destroy the white genetic, its obvious!

edit on 9-4-2013 by LUXUS because: (no reason given)


Nice to see someone who actually understands what "Deny Ignorance" means. Yes, it's very obvious but it seems most people are either asleep or idiots. Or both.

And the reason all the non-Whites flock to White nations is because..surprise, surprise..they are the only countries that actually work.



posted on Apr, 9 2013 @ 01:20 PM
link   
reply to post by ollncasino
 





75% of the UK's population has been in the UK for at least 7,500 years. Myths of British Ancestry That knocks on the head the left's invention that the UK is a nation of immigrants. Unless one calls people who have lived in a country for at least 7,500 years immigrants...


Heck I guess you have to keep in prospective. British is not a race. We are mongrels. y definiton then we are multi-cultured. Nothing wrong with that. I could understand your point if you were say an Aborigine. They are a race and have been there maybe 60,000 years. Really you are plucking at straws trying to prove a point that is not there



posted on Apr, 9 2013 @ 01:39 PM
link   
reply to post by MrRobertson
 


Well this did happen in Zimbabwe many white farmers started to set up there. Then Mugabe chucked them out. And they did complain. But they have no reason to complain really, they have a home and it surely is NOT Africa. So I am not against Mugabe in doing this what I am against is the bad treatment they endured in his country.

The fact is usually a country is kinda tailor made for the people who live there, climate, culture and behaviour etc .

So yes multi culturalism causes confusion if anything. Although many people live happily along side each other. I dont think they MIX as such, maybe at work. But in ideas, religion and so forth. No. Its the reason that ethnicities choose certain neighbourhoods and just stick togeather. Its sad... because a countrys people are supposed to stick togeather and tolerence should be shown by living in the same neighbourhoods.



posted on Apr, 9 2013 @ 01:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by purplemer

British is not a race. We are mongrels. Really you are plucking at straws trying to prove a point that is not there


I thought I had made my point very well.

Until the recent wave of left wing prompted mass third world immigration, 99% of the UK population had white, European Caucasian genes.

75% of the UK's population has been in the UK for at least 7,500 years. Another wave arrived 6,500years ago.

Myths of British Ancestry

To then claim that we are a nation of mongrels really is a classic example of the left wing trying to not only rewrite history but also genetics.



posted on Apr, 9 2013 @ 02:23 PM
link   
reply to post by ollncasino
 


Yes you did lay out your points clearly. I guess we are debating two sides of the same coin. and in this instance we will have to differ....



posted on Apr, 9 2013 @ 04:11 PM
link   
reply to post by ollncasino
 


Whilst I agree with a lot of what you have posted I would however contest your labelling it 'left wing prompted'.

Since the end of WWII the UK has seen a steady increase in immigration levels year by year - this has continued regardless of which party has been in office and their political sound bites.

The fact is that all the major political parties are reluctant to address or even discuss the UK's immigration policy and related issues in an open and frank manner.

Having said that it is worthwhile noting that the UK is not unique within the EU.

Country Total population (1000) Total Foreign-born (1000) % Born in other EU state (1000) % Born in a non EU state (1000) %
EU 27 501,098 47,348 9.4 15,980 3.2 31,368 6.3
Germany 81,802 9,812 12 3,396 4.2 6,415 7.8
France 64,716 7,196 11.1 2,118 3.3 5,078 7.8
UK 62,008 7,012 11.3 2,245 3.6 4,767 7.7
Spain 45,989 6,422 14 2,328 5.1 4,094 8.9
Italy 60,340 4,798 8 1,592 2.6 3,205 5.3
Holland 16,575 1,832 11.1 428 2.6 1,404 8.5
Greece 11,305 1,256 11.1 315 2.8 940 8.3
Sweden 9,340 1,337 14.3 477 5.1 859 9.2
Austria 8,367 1,276 15.2 512 6.1 764 9.1
Belgium 10,666 1,380 12.9 695 6.5 685 6.4
Portugal 10,637 793 7.5 191 1.8 602 5.7
Denmark 5,534 500 9 152 2.8 348 6.3

ETA
Apologies, the table looked better and a damn sight more legible when writing the post.
en.wikipedia.org...
edit on 9/4/13 by Freeborn because: Add ETA



posted on Apr, 9 2013 @ 05:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by Freeborn
Whilst I agree with a lot of what you have posted I would however contest your labelling it 'left wing prompted'.

Since the end of WWII the UK has seen a steady increase in immigration levels year by year - this has continued regardless of which party has been in office and their political sound bites.


I wouldn't disagree with you.

Still, left wing parties and the left wing press are undoubtedly a great driving force in pushing the benefits of mass immigration to the fore of the debate and shouting down anyone as racists who opposes mass immigration.

The elephant in the room is the fact that Europeans are not having enough children to maintain population levels, which explains why mass immigration is pursued by governments across the EU.

I have read the opinion that the EU can either allow mass immigration or become a guarded old peoples' home.

The problem with bringing in third world immigrants is that their reproduction levels tend to fall into line with Europeans within one generation. A notable exception is immigrant Pakistanis who continue to have very large families.

Governments must be aware that bringing in third world immigrants is only a short term solution that solves little in the long term. Still, when have Western governments ever though in anything but the short term?

Big business also presumably play a role in this, in that they tend to bankroll political parties and also benefit from employing cheaper first generation immigrants.

In the UK at least, while it is an EU wide phenomenon, what sets current immigration from the third world apart from previous waves of immigrations is its sheer scale. But you are correct that it is happening right across the EU and it is happening for a very good reason. People are not having enough children to maintain population levels, never mind matching the huge explosion in populations elsewhere around the globe.


edit on 9-4-2013 by ollncasino because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 9 2013 @ 05:29 PM
link   
reply to post by Freeborn
 


I agree with you in that it 's not simply a fiendish scheme dreamed up by leftist politicians (we flatter them by according them that much power), though it does fit in rather conveniently with leftist ideology. And the immigration rate tends to be slightly higher under Labour governments than Tory ones - though the difference is nothing to write home about.

It's very clear that British governments of whatever political leaning are under orders from a higher authority (and I'm not just talking about the EU).

I think the blueprint for globalisation was drawn up either during, or just after, WW2.

Probably in the USA.

And it's all about power, big business, profiteering.

I think the original observation went something along these lines:

"You know, gentlemen, we've got a great opportunity here to make a LOT of money, by just swamping our countries with people from the four corners of the globe. Think about it.....it will drive wages down, the unions will lose their teeth, we can pick and choose who we want from a massive populace who would be desperate for work and desperate to hang on to whatever crappy, low-paid job they manage to get. But the problem is that we would need to mix up the races which could cause us some problems. If anyone objects, we can just accuse them of racism and compare them to the Nazis - and everyone hates the Nazis for what they did to the Jews. I think it's a runner, I think this could work. Nevertheless, we must tread cautiously for quite a few decades yet......mass immigration must start off as a steady drip-feed till our populations get acclimatised to it......"

I believe the whole thing was devised by greedy capitalists, who were quite aware of the usefulness of left wing politics in the realisation of their master plan.



posted on Apr, 9 2013 @ 05:39 PM
link   
reply to post by LUXUS
 



It's pretty much failed world wide. Norway is slowly starting to reel at the problems due to the massive influx of non-Western immigrants. I'm not against immigration, however MASS immigration is nothing more then cultural genocide for both parties involved.

I came back to Norway in the year 2000. I've been here off and on for the past thirteen years. It's gotten bad, real bad. Places that once used to be very safe have turned into cesspits with drugs, rape and murder and all manner of crime. Things that were once unheard of prior to 1987 when Norway opened it's doors.

Same with Sweden. Mass immigration needs to stop. It helps the few and that's not good enough. We need another plan, one that involves fixing the problems within the third world countries so they can provide a more stable and secure future for themselves. We need to concentrate on a stable government (i.e. not corrupt), a real police force, food and water services and then massively fund education so every child (and adult) can get an education.

But I'm dreaming, I know. Even though it's not feasible to implant an entire nations populace in another. Because that's what we're trying to do. And it's just going to lead to a lot of heart ache down the road.



posted on Apr, 9 2013 @ 06:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by CJCrawley
I believe the whole thing was devised by greedy capitalists, who were quite aware of the usefulness of left wing politics in the realisation of their master plan.


I think you are correct.

Interestingly, the mistake that left wingers make is their belief that immigrants are their allies in helping to destroy old conservative institutions and social mores. What the left doesn't realize is that immigrants have their own agenda, which is often deeply at odds with the left's liberal beliefs.

A classic example is the MP George Galloway voting for gay marriage after being voted into power by a largely Muslim electorate. Something approaching 100% of the Muslims who voted George into power oppose gay marriage.

Muslims in Britain have zero tolerance of homosexuality, says poll



posted on Apr, 10 2013 @ 09:39 AM
link   
reply to post by FreedomEntered
 


Yes same happening in south Africa, but tell me what do those same farms look like today are they producing scrumptious crops or are they now wastelands?



posted on Apr, 10 2013 @ 09:52 AM
link   
reply to post by Auricom
 


There is no fix once your government has allowed its own people to become a minority in their own lands, now if that's not a conspiracy then what is! Remember politics works by votes so once your own people become a minority their voice is silenced...it is genocide!



posted on Apr, 10 2013 @ 10:12 AM
link   
Immigrants should integrate and adopt ENTER ANY COUNTRY HERE culture and values

All Countries Have a based culture which the country was / is founded on

So i would say that a country isnt multicultural as it has a founding culture, i would say that countries now are Multinational



posted on Apr, 10 2013 @ 04:00 PM
link   
reply to post by LUXUS
 


Then, as I said, I apologize for missjudging you. I know we have a preety bad reputation, but it is also true we have it because many of the illegal stuff we do. Well, next time you know what you have to do. No more "italianos".



posted on Apr, 10 2013 @ 04:05 PM
link   
it is beyond a joke, with even second generation immigrants thinking wtf is going on here

It is a calculated policy, by govts and big business (as well as general ineptitude)



posted on Apr, 10 2013 @ 05:38 PM
link   
Link

Above is a link to an article that shows a picture of a gay man who was beaten for walking arm in arm with his boyfriend through a muslim area.

Quote "A photo of a bruised and beaten gay man who claims he received his injuries while walking through a Muslim suburb of Paris arm in arm with his boyfriend has provoked shock and fresh concerns about the rise of ethnic extremism in western cities."

I thought we were enriched by this diversity?



posted on Apr, 10 2013 @ 05:52 PM
link   
It is like cancer.
get out before they Kill the host.
I wish I could.



posted on Apr, 11 2013 @ 07:13 AM
link   

Originally posted by FreedomEntered
reply to post by MrRobertson
 


Well this did happen in Zimbabwe many white farmers started to set up there. Then Mugabe chucked them out. And they did complain. But they have no reason to complain really, they have a home and it surely is NOT Africa. So I am not against Mugabe in doing this what I am against is the bad treatment they endured in his country.

The fact is usually a country is kinda tailor made for the people who live there, climate, culture and behaviour etc .

So yes multi culturalism causes confusion if anything. Although many people live happily along side each other. I dont think they MIX as such, maybe at work. But in ideas, religion and so forth. No. Its the reason that ethnicities choose certain neighbourhoods and just stick togeather. Its sad... because a countrys people are supposed to stick togeather and tolerence should be shown by living in the same neighbourhoods.


Erm so are you justifying genocide ?





new topics
top topics
 
17
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join