It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by HauntWok
Or are we going with real conservative beliefs of sensible taxation/spending (ala Reagan)?
Originally posted by downtown436
What really needs to happen is an overthrow of both Republican, and Democrat parties with freedom loving individuals!
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Hopechest
Well first of all, libertarians, at least their presidential candidate, wants to do away with all borders. He is on record as saying that he wants no border with Mexico.
Thanks for bringing this up. There are several branches of "Libertarian". There is Green Libertarian and Socialist Libertarian (or Left-Libertarian), and in my view they might as well be in the Progressive Party, but perhaps they are less Statist than their Progressive cousins.
Originally posted by cornucopia
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Hopechest
Well first of all, libertarians, at least their presidential candidate, wants to do away with all borders. He is on record as saying that he wants no border with Mexico.
Thanks for bringing this up. There are several branches of "Libertarian". There is Green Libertarian and Socialist Libertarian (or Left-Libertarian), and in my view they might as well be in the Progressive Party, but perhaps they are less Statist than their Progressive cousins.
I too am for no borders as we are ALL Human beings on planet Earth..
borders were designed to lock people and to make them more controllable...
when you look at it from a higher point of view you see Planet Earth and US Humans....We are Free to travel anywhere...no rules, except for your own moral codes and cosmic laws
Originally posted by Hopechest
Originally posted by Kali74
reply to post by Terminal1
People are generally motivated by one of two things to get into politics. One is to serve the public, the other more common reason is to play a game of getting rich and gaining power over others. No political party is immune to the latter. I think what those who are motivated by altruistic reasons need to do is, instead of trying to play the game, flip the game board over.
The majority of people who serve in politics never get rich. Many who do end up with millions were already rich before they ran.
It is about power, not money. Very few people in Congress, or the lower levels end up with million dollar speaking gigs once they retire and contrary to popular belief, politicians are not met in alleyways and given bags full of money.
The money comes from job opportunities or consulting positions promised after they retire and very few people in politics actually qualify for this. Only the top people are focused on by lobbyists. Your average congressman does not have a golden parachute waiting for him.
Originally posted by Parthin
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
Ron Paul supports the gold standard and the naive view that if we leave other countries alone they won't bother us. There is not enough gold in all of America, including Fort Knox, to operate our modern economy. And if you think hostile dictatorships will just leave us alone, you must have missed out on Pearl Harbor and 9/11 somehow. Because of these views, I cannot support Ron Paul.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
You can have the Statism. I prefer limited govt which is neither Statist nor anarchist. Thanks!
Originally posted by cornucopia
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Hopechest
Well first of all, libertarians, at least their presidential candidate, wants to do away with all borders. He is on record as saying that he wants no border with Mexico.
Thanks for bringing this up. There are several branches of "Libertarian". There is Green Libertarian and Socialist Libertarian (or Left-Libertarian), and in my view they might as well be in the Progressive Party, but perhaps they are less Statist than their Progressive cousins.
I too am for no borders as we are ALL Human beings on planet Earth..
borders were designed to lock people and to make them more controllable...
when you look at it from a higher point of view you see Planet Earth and US Humans....We are Free to travel anywhere...no rules, except for your own moral codes and cosmic laws
I am not a big fan of statism myself, but unlike you I can probably tolerate it better since I have lived many years in europe with a mixed economy and government accountability. Big government is not always a curse
The events of 9-11-2001 were done by NATO, as a two cargo planes hit the twin towers and a missle hit the pentagon.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Yep, the Socialists have already ruined Europe. Thanks but no thanks.
Nope Big Govt is always going to overrun it's boundaries. Yes there is something horribly wrong with Big Govt. It will always be a monster. Sometimes the monster will act nicey nice and sometimes it won't.
The events of 9-11-2001 were done by NATO, as a two cargo planes hit the twin towers and a missle hit the pentagon.
There is a disconnect here. You tolerate having the same people run every aspect of your life.edit on 8-4-2013 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)edit on 8-4-2013 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
You can have the Statism. I prefer limited govt which is neither Statist nor anarchist. Thanks!
I am not a big fan of statism myself, but unlike you I can probably tolerate it better since I have lived many years in europe with a mixed economy and government accountability. Big government is not always a curse, but in america it certainly is, because they are using statism to go after the little guys rather than big business and white collar crime.
Statism for a green economy would be ok as well. Not the IMF tax surcharge crap on petrol!
Originally posted by FeatherofMaat
reply to post by downtown436
And the GOP, and conservatism, is about to die as a result. Quite frankly, I can NOT thank you enough.