It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by adjensen
I've said this for a very long time. Anyone who has a background in advance mathematics doesn't struggle at all with the concept of three entirely different numbers being equal, if all three are infinite numbers.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by truejew
No, in Genesis 1:26 you have a single entity God, who speaks in a plural fashion.
Originally posted by adjensen
reply to post by BobAthome
No, it is not.
Originally posted by adjensen
Then you reject the divinity of Christ and proclaim yourself an Arian.
Originally posted by adjensen
You won't watch it (and if you did, you wouldn't understand it,) but LoneWolf's video does a good job of demonstrating that, even in the Old Testament, there are three distinct persons in the triune God, and rejecting that notion requires twisting or revision of scripture, just as you do with the New Testament.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by truejew
Dude, I'm tired of the Trinity debate with you. If you are fired up for that still go back and search through the pages of this thread and see my answers back then, they haven't changed. Otherwise, post something original.
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by adjensen
I've said this for a very long time. Anyone who has a background in advance mathematics doesn't struggle at all with the concept of three entirely different numbers being equal, if all three are infinite numbers.
You can demonstrate that by placing 2 mirrors facing each other, it creates and infinite corridor. An image of a person in those images are a perfect copy of the original, each one fully capable of interacting with it's own surroundings in it's own "universe", mirroring the original yet not independent of the original source. The source of origin moves, the copies move, and when the source of origin speaks the copies do too.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by truejew
Bcuz I'm crazy like that TJ. I ate to much Elmer's glue as a kid.
Originally posted by truejew
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by truejew
Bcuz I'm crazy like that TJ. I ate to much Elmer's glue as a kid.
Or perhaps you are beginning to see some truth?
Originally posted by adjensen
reply to post by NOTurTypical
Do you want to see the idiocy of this cult?
I keep seeing absolutely lunacy posted from members of it, and expect that someone, anyone, will pipe up and say "um... no, that's just dumb", but Gary Reckart, the person that all of these cultists look up to, just reinforces the ignorance.
Here, we see him claiming that the font that is used to print some text somehow incorporates evil. Reprinting "Lord" as "LORD" (with the "L" being larger, indicating that it is capitalized) is a "code", and somehow demonstrates something.
I'd say that it is a joke, but these people take it seriously.
I think that it is widely known that LORD (in all caps) refers to "YHWH" which was not in the Greek text.
Originally posted by truejew
I think that it is widely known that LORD (in all caps) refers to "YHWH" which was not in the Greek text.
And your slander and bigotry is getting old.
Plus you may want to edit out the email address.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by adjensen
I wouldn't call Reckhart a cult leader. Generally they need charisma.
Originally posted by adjensen
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by adjensen
I wouldn't call Reckhart a cult leader. Generally they need charisma.
Well, I didn't say that he was a successful leader, lol.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by adjensen
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by adjensen
I wouldn't call Reckhart a cult leader. Generally they need charisma.
Well, I didn't say that he was a successful leader, lol.
I'll agree with the status of wannabe. Seriously, when you look over his material does it dumbfound you as to how someone can get themselves so twisted with absurd logic?