It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
That is not even close to the amount of money that would be required to provide top level education and care for every child in Canada, 8 hrs /day.
Why? They already provide a school...filled with educators. You can send your child there, same as everybody else.
If your community is too small for that level of service...move. This Canadian has zero intention of paying for your overinflated sense of self worth.
People are demanding we fix the broken tail-light of a Ford. If education was overhauled to include a nutrition program for student success then I wouldn't have a problem with it.
When we learned of this incident Tuesday afternoon...
Originally posted by GreenGlassDoor
Reply to post by elevatedone
Welcome to real life: if you do not pay you will not eat.
Since schools are supposed to be preparing youngsters for life this will be one of those lessons that actually mean something.
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
Originally posted by Aleister
Have you ever looked at what the chldren are given? The U.S. pays milk and cheese producers for their extras - it's a farm/dairy subsidy - and milk and cheese are not healthy for children and other living things (except very young calves). And "meat"!!! Schools actually give the children corpses to eat, helping them set-in-stone a lifelong habit of thinking that it's OK to eat "meat" when, in fact, it may possibly kill them someday. Schools should serve all vegan meals, imnho, and should have done so long ago.
But on topic, I bet the people who decided this policy are regretting it just about.....now. See it reversed soon if it hasn't been already.edit on 5-4-2013 by Aleister because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by GreenGlassDoor
Reply to post by this_is_who_we_are
No, they are not.
Look, the average student is already running a bill of $10K a year and 1/3 will drop out and a full 80% that do graduate will not be up to snuff when it comes to possessing skills at their grade level.
So now people start boohooing when these future dropout flunkies miss a meal.
You go to school to learn. It's not a state sponsored babysitter. So the schools will fail them on the reading, writing, arithmetic part and there is no outrage but if they can teach them a lesson on life it's outrageous. Seems like screwed up thinking to me.
I view public education as a bad investment (it's failed the students and society) and *school* lunches are part of that failed institution.
C'mon, by the very nature you were homeless is a big clue that things ain't free.
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
Originally posted by GreenGlassDoor
Reply to post by tothetenthpower
Actually study after study has shown that the single biggest factor in student success is parental participation and interest in their student's life.
Sending Johnny to school and expecting the school to take up the slack by default kind of shows the level of participation here, ja?
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com