reply to post by daskakik
You made a comment about those documents in particular and I just pointed out that they are not "court papers verifying and holding responsible
"parties" who electronically harrassed this man". Nothing more, nothing less.
Then, in your estimation, what are they?
Really? I thought I made it quite clear that I believe it can and does happen but that I am not inclined to just believe any particular person because
they say so.
And so, then, what would it take for you to believe? Because no matter what information has been provided you, you argue incessantly that information
provided is insignificant, proof of nothing. I am wondering what "proofs" you would, in fact, accept. Court papers, scientific evidence,
notwithstanding, others' assertions that it is real, from other sources other than anecdotal, do not seem to sway you in the least. So really? Right
back at you. There does not seem to be anything you accept from any source whatsoever, anecdotal or otherwise. And so, my question to you is this?:
what proofs would you accept?
Actually, I wouldn't expect them to so, I would have no problem with that.
Ah, but yes, you would have a problem,, which betrays your obvious inability to understand what this does to a human being....and if you did suffer
what is described, you would have a rather large problem, for you would be totally functionally rendered unable to deal with absolutely anything, for
this is what this does to a person dealing with this... So I gather that you would have no problem encountering someone such as yourself, suffering,
with no where and no one to turn to. How sad. And again, how narrow minded of you. So you are saying, I suppose,, that you wouldn't expect to be
believed and would be perfectly content with the hijacking of your mind, and by extension, the framing of your ife and psyche by remotely active
hijackers of your mind and your life...rendering you absolutely useless in the world, bearing the judgement of a nutjob, and be perfectly happy with
that. For the way you present the innate and natural response that there is no available proof acceptable to you, you would just go on, fucntionally
rendered psychotic or even worse, and be compassionate withe those like yourself with absolutely no ability to prove nor fight back, and be just fine
with the hell you wouuld be living through. I wonder, with this in mind, what kind of person that you are, and what you interpret justice to
Oh yes, I think you would have a very big problem with that, seeing and experiencing the total destruction of your life, the slander, the inability
to make a living, and watch your children and loved ones pay the price right along with you.....sorry, you are failing to make any sense here. And I
find that you, and t hose like you, accepting no proof, arguing incessantly there is no available means to prove such happening to you, are people
perpetuating the problem. And frankly, I do not believe you at all, that you would have no problem with this. You are simply showing you totally
lack a grasp, at all, of what this can do to an individual's life, and further, don't reallly care.
My thoughts in no way allow, nor can they keep any of this from happening to any one else.
edit on 9-5-2013 by daskakik because: (no reason given)
No, but your "thoughts" perpetuate a problem that you seem to not accept at any level whatsoever. Are you part of the problem or part of
the solution. The fact is, it isn't happening to you, and you give every evidence of not caring a whit that it IS in fact a real problem, and rather
than seek answers to it, argue incessantly that there seems to be no proof possible, and thereby, very much allow this to continue, just in that your
refusal to accept, nor react in any possible compassionate way, or to seek answers, which means that it effectively shuts people up, for they would
not want to encounter the obvious nay-sayer side of the situation, which do, actually, perpetuate and add to the problem.
Logically speaking, your logic or lack thereof, non sequitor realted, one thing not following another in your conclusions, ARE, in fact, very much
part of the problem, and give those who refuse to even entertain proofs, solutions or belief, absolutely add to this problem. Otherwise, you would
apply at least some of what you respond to, to solutions, proofs you would accept, etc. This is how you betray that you have no belief, no sympathy,
and no desire to address the reality of the situation, other than to incessantly argue the point. And it seems you do so for no other reason than to
deny, deny, deny. This is ignorance, I find, in its most graceless, inhumane, bull headedness that indeed, allows for the problem to
edit on 9-5-2013 by tetra50 because: (no reason given)