It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Sagitaris
WHY IS NOVA NOT EXPLAINING WHY IT BROKE UP IN THE ATMOSPHERE!!!
what was it that broke it up I DONT KNOW...
Originally posted by Aleister
The most telling thing to me about the NOVA show (I watched the whole thing) is what they DIDN'T show. Minute after minute of the meteor going across the sky was shown, some of the clips repeated 10 or so times. And not once was there that close-up of maybe something coming up and hitting the meteor and knocking off large pieces of it.
I don't buy that vid shot totally, but it is interesting and coincidental. When the flare from the windshield, or the solid object itself, comes in from the left and hits the meteor it "causes" an explosion. That was interesting either way, we got to see the meteor falling apart - but NOVA left it on the cutting-room floor. That had to be a conscious decision. Either they didn't want to have to explain it or they didn't want people to see it. Someone decided that the viewing public should be kept away from that particular view.
Originally posted by Aleister
Originally posted by flexy123
Originally posted by Aleister
reply to post by zilebeliveunknown
The most telling thing to me about the NOVA show (I watched the whole thing) is what they DIDN'T show. Minute after minute of the meteor going across the sky was shown, some of the clips repeated 10 or so times. And not once was there that close-up of maybe something coming up and hitting the meteor and knocking off large pieces of it.
I don't buy that vid shot totally, but it is interesting and coincidental. When the flare from the windshield, or the solid object itself, comes in from the left and hits the meteor it "causes" an explosion. That was interesting either way, we got to see the meteor falling apart - but NOVA left it on the cutting-room floor. That had to be a conscious decision. Either they didn't want to have to explain it or they didn't want people to see it. Someone decided that the viewing public should be kept away from that particular view.
edit on 5-4-2013 by Aleister because: (no reason given)
Yep, let's just ignore the 100s of Russians who caught the meteor in HD from all angles - and let's make up a totally non-founded and silly theory. Gotta love ATS.
Apparantly you didn't read my post. Please read it. The NOVA program did not show the close-up of the meteor being hit by something (some say it was a UFO, same say a weapon projectile, some say a light reflection in the windshield of the car filming it). That was my point - that they did not show it even though they showed most of those 100s of videos, some over and over again. They did not show a close-up. My second point was that someone on the show's staff had to make a conscious decision not to show a close-up of the meteor's break-up.
You got three stars for that nonsense post (or more politely, that response based on misunderstanding a post) Please give them back (hahahaha, that's right, take them out of your pocket and give them back).
reply to post by Sagitaris
My point exactly. You deserve flexy's stars'
edit on 5-4-2013 by Aleister because: (no reason given)edit on 5-4-2013 by Aleister because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Sagitaris
I thought up a scenario were the larger meteorite's speed decreased as it traveled through the dense atmosphere, because it was much more massive than the UFO/smaller meteorite, the UFO/smaller meteorite had to be aerodynamic allowing it to avoid the decrease in speed and then it hit the larger meteorite from behind and (somehow) pierced the larger meteorite....
Larger meteoroids, particularly the stone variety, tend to break up between 7 and 17 miles (11 to 27 km) above the surface due to the forces induced by atmospheric drag, and perhaps also due to thermal stress. A meteoroid which disintegrates tends to immediately lose the balance of its cosmic velocity because of the lessened momentum of the remaining fragments.
Originally posted by SayonaraJupiter
Another Asteroid Threat news story from today:
Sen. Bill Nelson unveils NASA plan to capture asteroid
NASA plans to lasso an asteroid and park it by the moon, and they say they can put astronauts on it by 2021.
Read more: www.upi.com...
Originally posted by Aleister
but NOVA didn't want to play it for some reason.
Originally posted by wildespace
Why are we so focused on the NOVA documentary? Let's watch and discuss the original videos themselves. There are tons of them, and tons of people who saw it with their own eyes.
So easy to accuse one documentary of "hiding the truth", so hard to acknowledge the existence of original sources available on the Internet.edit on 6-4-2013 by wildespace because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by terriblyvexed
reply to post by Aleister
Is this post meant for me?
If so I never accused you of saying ufo. I was giving you an explanation to the
shining object, chunks of reflective ice.
I noticed your anger toward the other posts, so I said I wasn't being confrontational.
You sir have a chip on your shoulder.
Originally posted by deadeyedick
I had a dream about this event.
We really should not continue to piss GOD off.
www.abovetopsecret.com...edit on 6-4-2013 by deadeyedick because: why not
Originally posted by Aleister
reply to post by syrinx high priest
I don't think the meteor killed a person. It likely killed fish, or insects, near the area where what was left of it broke up and landed. It injured lots of humans. Did I miss something about a death? Thanks.