It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Cancerwarrior
OK, do you really think that drug testing people will keep guns out of criminal hands? Do you really think meth and crack dealers buy their guns legally at WalMart? They cant even keep drugs out of the prisons, so how are they supposed to keep ilegal weapons off the streets? LOL! The vast majority of violent crimes committed in the US there are no firearms involved.
Originally posted by Cancerwarrior
And like I said, if you rule out people that are on medication that is a great majority of Americans. You can't get a drivers license over there if you wear glasses or contacts? seriously? And they make you take a blood test? What country are you in? You may see nothing wrong with it but I consider drug testing (even for jobs) to be a major invasion of privacy. And like I said above, there are many ways around drug tests.
Originally posted by Cancerwarrior
Here in the US we have minor offenses also. But we also have the three strikes rule. I recently read an article where a man in Florida was sentenced to 25 years because he stole a package of socks at Walmart. It was his third strike. Over here we have the prison industrial complex full of mostly non violent drug offenders. Going to jail here does not mean you are a violent gun toting criminal. And your record stays with you seven years but will always say what you got arrested for no matter how much time has passed if you are taking a background check.
Originally posted by Cancerwarrior
So you also are saying that poor people are more likely to shoot others?
Originally posted by Cancerwarrior
I am on disability and make less than 1000 bucks a month. I would say I fit your profile of low income. Should I go turn in my rifles and shotguns because I can shoot someone because I am so poor? LOLOLOL
And who is going to license these hunters and fishermen? Let me guess...the government.
You are putting entirely too much faith in a corrupt government that gets worse by the week.
Maybe you should learn a bit more about American society and culture before making a bull___p thread like this.
Lets entertain the notion for a second that somehow magically every gun in the world is gone. Like when Superman gathered all the nukes and threw them into the sun. Are you really naive enough to think that people will stop killing each other when they feel like it?
I think they should pass a law where everyone must be armed. That would be a much more polite society.edit on 4-4-2013 by Cancerwarrior because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Cabin
Out of low level criminals without any connections, yes. Round here it is not that easy to get hold of a gun illegally, unless you have good contacts.
Originally posted by Cabin
Even on prescription drugs? It is hard to compare, as I have no personal experience. Round here it is quite uncommon to be seeing psychiatrist or being under meds or at least much less common than in USA.
Originally posted by Cabin
There are many ways around, but many people do not know these ways around and would get busted.
Originally posted by Cabin
I do not know how corrupt the goverment, yet I know the fact round here nearly nobody has personal guns, I personally do not any of the people I know (at least when we have talked) to have a gun. Most people who have are either hunters and some people for self-protection (rare) and training (shooters). Overally around 12/100 people, USA has 88/100. I am in the mid-20s and I have never seen a gun or heard a shot. It is simply that rare. In a year there is in total about 1,5 gun-deaths per 100 000, compared to 10,5 in USA. That is the difference with stronger gun control, the first 3 rules are used with some extras -certain guns are banned and some other rules. Overally it is uncommon to own a gun and most people would not be able to afford one.
Originally posted by Cabin
I am not talking particularly about you, but there are many people in a similar condition like you are and some of them consider criminal activity out of desperation.
Originally posted by Cabin
The system is like that and nothing can change it. 90%+ of people might be honest, but because of the 10%- being dishonest, everybody needs to be controlled.
Originally posted by Cabin
I am not saying guns should be banned or something like that, simply I believe there should be some rules that have to be met before getting a gun permission:
1) People with mental problems should never be allowed to get a gun. Any disorder, which could have anger management issues, like ADHD, should also not be allowed to own a gun. Also people who have mental problems that need to be dealt with prescription drugs. Full mental evaluation from government facilitated mental hospitals should be done first. Private practicioners should not be counted.
2) Drug addicts should not be allowed to have a gun - common sense
3) People with criminal record should not be allowed to have a gun - common sense.
4) I believe the financial stability of a person should be considered somehow. Most criminals in the world have started out due to financial difficulties. The first thing that comes to mind (which would not be require much extra tests or paperwork) would be education, as uneducated people are more likely to fall into financial difficulties (especially when they are not very intelligent, which often (not always) uneducated people tend to be) , which could lead desperate people to criminal world. At least high school education should be required if not higher education (I would prefer the latter personally). Although there might be better ways to consider or predict the likelyhood of a person falling into financial trouble and doing something illegal to get out of it. Intelligence seems too harsh to be considered, as IQ-test does not predict that much. Maybe someone can suggest something for it?
Recheck every couple of years is needed.
I personally do not believe these are even "strict" rules. Rather soft to be true. After mental, criminal, educational and addiction records are evaluated any person can get a firearm. Criminals and people with mental issues/addictions should never have an option of obtaining a fire-arm legally...
Originally posted by JohnPhoenix
It is also of the sort that my state does not require it to be registered or even have a permit to carry on the hip openly. I can wear it most places in public. I'm sure that freaks you out.
Originally posted by Cabin
The system is like that and nothing can change it. 90%+ of people might be honest, but because of the 10%- being dishonest, everybody needs to be controlled. It is already in most laws that require extra paperwork and documents. Most people would not lie and be honest about their situation/condition, although because of the few lying people, who try to use the "loophole", everybody needs to be controlled.
Originally posted by Logarock
And that purpose is protected by the bill of rights. Strange isnt it?
I think to vote, one must pass a test on the constitution.
Originally posted by agentscoly
reply to post by Cabin
How do you know that all of these happenings are not made. How do you know that the reality you live in is not made up from your government? You are spoon fed media daily to control you yet the actions of an insane are not questioned. Mind control experiments have been taking place for years right under our noses who is to say these "insane" men are not victims themselves?
Originally posted by Cabin
1) People with mental problems should never be allowed to get a gun. Any disorder, which could have anger management issues, like ADHD, should also not be allowed to own a gun. Also people who have mental problems that need to be dealt with prescription drugs. Full mental evaluation from government facilitated mental hospitals should be done first. Private practicioners should not be counted.
Originally posted by Cabin
2) Drug addicts should not be allowed to have a gun - common sense
Originally posted by Cabin
3) People with criminal record should not be allowed to have a gun - common sense.
Originally posted by Cabin
4) I believe the financial stability of a person should be considered somehow. Most criminals in the world have started out due to financial difficulties. The first thing that comes to mind (which would not be require much extra tests or paperwork) would be education, as uneducated people are more likely to fall into financial difficulties (especially when they are not very intelligent, which often (not always) uneducated people tend to be) , which could lead desperate people to criminal world. At least high school education should be required if not higher education (I would prefer the latter personally). Although there might be better ways to consider or predict the likelyhood of a person falling into financial trouble and doing something illegal to get out of it. Intelligence seems too harsh to be considered, as IQ-test does not predict that much. Maybe someone can suggest something for it?[/qiote]
Nice one......so, trash the economy, make most people financially needy, and then tell them they can't have guns. People aren't granted freedoms based on IQ, either. They have freedoms as a natural RIGHT. What part of "freedom" don't you grasp??
Originally posted by Cabin
I personally do not believe these are even "strict" rules. Rather soft to be true. After mental, criminal, educational and addiction records are evaluated any person can get a firearm. Criminals and people with mental issues/addictions should never have an option of obtaining a fire-arm legally...edit on 4-4-2013 by Cabin because: Edited the 4th point.
You can believe whatever you want, but those beliefs do NOT mean you can usurp the rights of others.
Originally posted by Cancerwarrior
Originally posted by MrJohnSmith
reply to post by Logarock
Logarock, i never could understand the bizarre American " Right to bear arms " according
to the constitution.
But then I wouldn't " Get it " being British ,
Its quite simple really. How many times has the mainland US been invaded in its history? How many times has Britain been invaded in its history? Even Hitler said that an invasion of the continental US was impossible because "Everyone is armed."
Not to mention since record numbers of Americans are trusting the government less and less I don't want them to be the only ones who are armed. Like I said, quite simple to understand really even for a firearm free Brit.
Originally posted by Cabin
Originally posted by slowisfast
Originally posted by MrJohnSmith
But then I wouldn't " Get it " being British ,
It has nothing to do with being British...
You just don't get it.
To be honest most countries do not get it, as constitution and rights are not taken that seriously in most countries. To be honest, I have never even read the constitution here and do not know what rights I have . I simply take things logically, basically all of my rights and no-rights are simply a matter of common (moral) sense. If I might be dangerous for the society, then I would not fight for my right to own a gun, even if the constitution said otherwise...
edit on 4-4-2013 by Cabin because: (no reason given)