posted on Apr, 3 2013 @ 06:28 PM
reply to post by ApocolypzeNow
Here's what she said:
CO State Rep. Diana DeGette (D)
"I will tell you these are ammunition, they’re bullets, so the people who have those now they’re going to shoot them, so if you ban them in the
future, the number of these high capacity magazines is going to decrease dramatically over time because the bullets will have been shot and there
won’t be any more available."
It sounds to me like she is talking about banning bullets. Hence, if people can't get their hands on ammo they won't need high capacity
Hmmmmm, so is that the Democrats plan? To ban bullets?
Yes, she does start out talking about bullets and ammunition. But her statement following, "The number of these highg capacity magazines is going to
decrease dramatically over time because the bullets will have been shot and there won't be any more available." I the questionable comment.....
So yes, your idea is not wrong, but her idea that a magazine just disappears because there are no bullets, is pretty ridiculous, unless she is talking
about them rusting away.......
You do bring up a good point though! Maybe she slipped up and gave away the plan to do away with ammunition. Although I can't see that happening, but
as long as Homeland Security keeps locking them in with their contracts, they can sure make it difficult to purchase them!
You made me think, so star to you!