It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by kimish
reply to post by daryllyn
They may have thought she was obese and claiming to be pregnant.
Originally posted by kimish
I don't condone the force the officers used, I think it was unacceptable, other means could've and should've been used.
However, playing devils advocate, when you obstruct justice you should expect to be dealt with. I also find it ironic that you only see what the person recording wants you to see. I don't recall seeing how the whole incident started or what led up to where the video begins in the Youtube video.
Originally posted by WaterBottle
reply to post by kimish
Let's just embed the video so you can watch it again....
The cops did not tell her to lay on her stomach.
Wrong. The cops say "get on the ground or you'll get tased". She then says she can't because she is pregnant. He then tases her, then throws himself on top of her.
There's more to this story than we are told and what we see from the video
Don't care if there is, it's irrelevant to the force being used. Two men do not need a taser in order to subdue a woman, especially after she tells you she is pregnant over and over again.
Last I knew pregnant women do sleep laying down.
Not an 8 month pregnant one
police aren't robots or cyborgs, they are human just like us.
And? I'm human and I know I'm surely not going to go into a rage and taser a pregnant woman because she said she couldn't get on the ground because she was pregnant.
Originally posted by LadyGreenEyes
Originally posted by kimish
I don't condone the force the officers used, I think it was unacceptable, other means could've and should've been used.
However, playing devils advocate, when you obstruct justice you should expect to be dealt with. I also find it ironic that you only see what the person recording wants you to see. I don't recall seeing how the whole incident started or what led up to where the video begins in the Youtube video.
I was thinking the same thing. WHERE is the rest of the video? What was happening over there, to cause another cop to have to rush in? Her being pregnant doesn't excuse attacking a cop, and all we have is her word that she didn't, as we don't get the entire video. When we can see the WHOLE thing, then, and only then, will I form an opinion. If she did, in fact, attack a cop while pregnant, SHE endangered her own child. If she didn't, then the entire video could prove that. The fact that we don't have all of it makes me believe someone is lying, to make people mad at the cops.
Well, since this was in a Best Buy lot, I would be they have surveillance videos, that will PROVE what actually happened. Anyone want to place odds to who is really at fault? I would bet we hear NOTHING from this woman after this initial story, because the videos show she did, in fact, make a move against the cop. Any takers?edit on 5-4-2013 by LadyGreenEyes because: just because
Originally posted by Grimpachi
reply to post by LadyGreenEyes
Don’t be so sure about the surveillance video. Remember the guy the cops killed coming out of a Costco there were plenty of eye witnesses that the police overstepped and basically murdered him but when it came time for it to go to court the surveillance system recordings were nowhere to be found.
Big business will always help out the Leos why would they go against their own protection. They are simply a form of paid protection no different than how mafia works.
Originally posted by ChuckNasty
Not sure about the rest of the video, but did anyone else notice the sound of distress in the officers voice at the beginning? Some serious crap must have or was about to happen...
Originally posted by Bilky
reply to post by LadyGreenEyes
[, more]
You say its justified but why? The taser is not for compliance like a baton, it is for armed or dangerous offenders. How can a woman of that size be dangerous? You have already started to equate a high voltage device with a pair of cuffs or batton which it is not.
Originally posted by Bilky
reply to post by LadyGreenEyes
[, more]
You say its justified but why? The taser is not for compliance like a baton, it is for armed or dangerous offenders. How can a woman of that size be dangerous? You have already started to equate a high voltage device with a pair of cuffs or batton which it is not.
Originally posted by Bilky
reply to post by LadyGreenEyes
[, more]
You say its justified but why? The taser is not for compliance like a baton, it is for armed or dangerous offenders. How can a woman of that size be dangerous? You have already started to equate a high voltage device with a pair of cuffs or batton which it is not.
Originally posted by HomerinNC
what if the shock from the taser induced early labor? what if it killed the unborn infant, what then?
this is sick, if that happened to my sons mom when she was preg, i can tell you that someone would be going to the hospital, and it wouldnt be me