It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Emily_Cragg
I didn't feel the "experience" of lens flares on camera photos was irrelevant to what we know about the sky when we take a photo
It seems to me, the study of lens flares is crucial to knowing what is physically real...
are we just supposted to shoot and guess that what comes out is always a hoax, by definition?
[shrug]...on what is and what isn't a lens flare.
at what point will we be able to view Sedna with the naked eye?
I'm trying to figure out what this blue thingie is that keeps showing up as a large blue or gray blog on so many sky-cam photos.
How do you make these decisions, yourself?
Originally posted by Emily_Cragg
I don't see how it is that a "lens flare" can be spherical in one photo, pyramidal in another and cubical in yet another; and yet you will tell me that these "shapes" all come from "lens aberrations." No way.