 |
reply posted on 3-11-2004 @ 10:14 AM by Gazrok
|
 Gazrok, with all due respect, this type of thinking is one of the problems with the liberal left. 58,296,120 people who voted for George W.
Bush are not ALL crazy, right wing, Christian Crusaders. Most are normal everyday Americans you work with, play with, drive alongside on the highways,
etc. 
Still doesn't change the fact that many voters made their priority "family values" and supported a candidate out of prejudice and fear, instead of
hope for the future.
I do not hate those who voted for Bush. But, when I work with, play with, drive alongside, etc. them, I will definitely be blaming them every time
Bush hurts this nation for the next 4 or more years....
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-11-2004 @ 10:18 AM by Aelita
|
Originally posted by Gazrok
Still doesn't change the fact that many voters made their priority "family values" and supported a candidate out of prejudice and fear, instead of
hope for the future.

Well said, Gazrok.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-11-2004 @ 10:22 AM by Dreamz
|
Originally posted by Gazrok
 Gazrok, with all due respect, this type of thinking is one of the problems with the liberal left. 58,296,120 people who voted for George W.
Bush are not ALL crazy, right wing, Christian Crusaders. Most are normal everyday Americans you work with, play with, drive alongside on the highways,
etc. 
Still doesn't change the fact that many voters made their priority "family values" and supported a candidate out of prejudice and fear, instead of
hope for the future.
I do not hate those who voted for Bush. But, when I work with, play with, drive alongside, etc. them, I will definitely be blaming them every time
Bush hurts this nation for the next 4 or more years.... 
Blame who you want, its easy to put blame on something its a real man who can step up and do what they believe in. As far as family values, I think
you can go back to every election in history and say this was always a top issue based on economy, security, education and health care so your
arguement of family values is bleak at best. As you can see all those are family "value" issues.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-11-2004 @ 10:23 AM by phreak_of_nature
|
Is it over yet?
I told myself I wasn't going to sleep until one of them gave up. At 2AM, and a 12 pack, I was either going to pass in my chair or throwup  on
my desk. I decided to go to bed.
Now hopefully I can go to sleep with JFK coming out to speak in about 1.5 hours.
4 more beers, 4 more beers
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-11-2004 @ 10:26 AM by MaskedAvatar
|
Ohio & Polling Booths & Walton Odell
That's one small round of golf for a man.
One giant leap backwards for America.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-11-2004 @ 10:27 AM by Dreamz
|
Originally posted by phreak_of_nature
I told myself I wasn't going to sleep until one of them gave up. At 2AM, and a 12 pack, I was either going to pass in my chair or throwup  on
my desk. I decided to go to bed.
Now hopefully I can go to sleep with JFK coming out to speak in about 1.5 hours.
4 more beers, 4 more beers 
Haha, nice......Wish I could be slamming a few down.  I stayed up til 6am central time, woke up at 8 to take my daughter to school and now am
completely hashed. Think ill need a early nap tonight.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-11-2004 @ 10:30 AM by sandge
|
Ain't that the truth. I'm planning to get drunk and stay that way until 2008.
Anybody wanna join me in my underground bunker for a cutthroat game of quarters? When we re-emerge in four years, Hillary and Barack will be there to
tell us that it was all just a bad dream.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-11-2004 @ 10:35 AM by FredT
|
Not that it seems to matter.
MSNBC has declared Nevada for Bush putting him over the top with 274 (asumming Ohio satys red)
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-11-2004 @ 10:39 AM by ThunderCloud
|
Originally posted by Gazrok
... It's about a Christian majority still seeking to impose their puritanical views on others, and launch a new Crusade against an enemy of their own
making. 
Since when did being conservative automatically equal being a fundamentalist Christian? Is being liberal automatically equal to being an athiest
socialist?
True, most of the U.S. population (those who voted for Democrats included) consider themselves Christians, but very few would qualify as
'fundamentalist'.
As for puritanical views being enforced... George W. Bush has been President for four years now, and I can still buy porn on DVD, go to strip clubs,
and watch South Park on Comedy Central.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-11-2004 @ 10:45 AM by Gazrok
|
 Blame who you want, its easy to put blame on something its a real man who can step up and do what they believe in. As far as family values, I
think you can go back to every election in history and say this was always a top issue based on economy, security, education and health care so your
arguement of family values is bleak at best. As you can see all those are family "value" issues.

Voters were polled on the most important topic of the election.
They said family values, not
Economy
Security
War on Terror
Education
Health
etc.
They said "family values". Since the only "family values" issues were gay marriage and stem cell research, my argument of puritanical views
driving this election seems perfectly valid imho....  But the majority has spoken, and if the majority are bible thumping zealots, well, thems just
the breaks...
Now that the election is over, I hope that President Bush can step up his game. This election (unlike 2000) he seems to have won legitimately, and
while I disagree agressively with his policies, I can now at least, in good conscience, treat him with the respect the office deserves.
I only hope we never get the chance to say "I told you so".
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-11-2004 @ 11:12 AM by Questor
|
Hooray for Bush! (In terms of the choices that were available)
There was no better alternative IMHO.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-11-2004 @ 11:13 AM by phreak_of_nature
|
Gazrok, It has always been my opinion that fundementalists of any kind are what ruins a society such as ours. But a Fundementalist in my estimation is
someone who takes a viewpoint and then takes it to the extreme. Christian, Jewish, Muslim, liberal, conservative, you can find extremists within all
of these groups.
I guess I have a problem with Conservatives being labeled as christian fundementalists. I consider myself to be on the conservative side of the
middle, but I am no christian, nor jew, nor muslim, and I hate to see anyone labeled.
Gazrok, your great, and I love a lot of the things you say, I just can't agree with you on this.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-11-2004 @ 11:14 AM by MaskedAvatar
|
Originally posted by Gazrok
This election (unlike 2000) he seems to have won legitimately, and while I disagree agressively with his policies, I can now at least, in good
conscience, treat him with the respect the office deserves.

?
Keeps looking at site motto.
Respect is due to a man, not an office. Personal power not positional power.
Where exactly is the tested legitimacy in the election process? Is it in a barrage of statistics, or in the opponent's concession?
?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-11-2004 @ 11:18 AM by smokenmirrors
|
well said....hmmm, debateable, however, that the quote is indicitive of the exact problem of the liberal left, a total misunderstanding of the
importance of conservative values in the lives of mainstream americans, is undeniable. you see friends, it is not only Bush who won, it is, and has
been for the past several years, a definitive shift in the house and senate as well, toward this so hated morality of the republican party. why don't
you see that? amazing! possibly, just possibly, the voting public is expressing its dissatisfaction with the very things you mention, ie: homosexual
marriage, gay rights, abortion, taxation, and the like, maybe they are just fed up with having these things shoved down their throat by a very, very,
vocal minority.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-11-2004 @ 11:39 AM by ThunderCloud
|
Originally posted by phreak_of_nature
Gazrok, It has always been my opinion that fundementalists of any kind are what ruins a society such as ours. But a Fundementalist in my estimation is
someone who takes a viewpoint and then takes it to the extreme. Christian, Jewish, Muslim, liberal, conservative, you can find extremists within all
of these groups. 
You can be a fundamentalist over anything. There are even fundamentalist Star Trek and Star Wars fans!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-11-2004 @ 12:31 PM by Voice_of Doom
|
Originally posted by MaskedAvatar
Keeps looking at site motto.
Respect is due to a man, not an office. Personal power not positional power.
Where exactly is the tested legitimacy in the election process? Is it in a barrage of statistics, or in the opponent's concession?
? 
Good point MA. Since we don't have paper trails for a lot of the votes...who knows who won. Remember Diebold's promise???? Remember hackers
saying they could fix the vote. Remember how some of the software turned up dubious reports in Argentina's election?
As Stalin once said, "I don't care who casts the votes, only who counts them."
As hard as the media tries to make this election "legitimate". I don't think it will work. The anti-Bush sentiment is too strong, been burned
once already and it has to go somewhere.
Stock up on water, oil and supplies, kiddies!
There is no friend anywhere - Lao Tse
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-11-2004 @ 02:21 PM by Herman
|
Sorry...only read the first page. I'm stupid.
[edit on 3-11-2004 by Herman]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-11-2004 @ 03:16 PM by NothingMakesSense
|
Kerry Conceded as a gentlman should in this case; with honor when it became apparent he could not win. He graciously handed the victory to W
officially without calling upon the disgusting tactics of recounts and litigation. Thank you John Kerry for keeping some intimation of chivilary
alive in this nation of corrupt values.
Hey, it's the least I could do considering the guy lost.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-11-2004 @ 03:27 PM by TrickmastertricK
|
HEY!!
I just wanted to say thank you to everyone who contributed to this thread. i think it was a very enjoyable Night on this thread. I think we all had
some fun regardless of who we wanted to win.  to everyone!!!!!!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-11-2004 @ 03:28 PM by Gazrok
|
 Respect is due to a man, not an office. Personal power not positional power. 
a good point...but try as I may, I cannot bring myself to respect President Bush.
I'm hoping, sincerely hoping, that he can change that in the next 4 years....I really do.
 Gazrok, your great, and I love a lot of the things you say, I just can't agree with you on this. 
Pay me no mind...I (like half the nation) am just venting...
[edit on 3-11-2004 by Gazrok]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |