posted on Apr, 1 2013 @ 12:13 PM
I'd prefer mothman, not that I believe in mothman...it's more likely that bigfoot exists than mothman because bigfoot is far more plausible.
Am I the only one who finds the bigfoot thing kinda bland? I like the subject of cryptozoology, it's fascinating, but bigfoot bores me,
because...well, it's just a big ape-like thing, whereas mothman is really quite mysterious and almost paranormal.
Don't get me wrong, it'd be cool if they proved once and for all that bigfoot was real, but consequently, I'd forget all about it and be largely
unamazed...but if they caught mothman, or a jersey devil...that'd be quite remarkable.
Seems more people are desperately seeking the huge ape type thing, and I always wondered why. As a product of reality, of nature, bigfoot is
plausible...I don't understand why people care about it so much.
Be like discovering a new lizard or something...we know lizards exist, this is just another type of lizard we've never seen before...cool, but not
I'd rather we found some mythical monster...even a unicorn would be more interesting than a large apeloid.
Sorry for the rant, but seriously...if you had the choice right now, to prove conclusively once and for all that either bigfoot or mothman are
real...which would you choose?