I was concerned/upset by the thread “Natural humans a.k.a "empty shells" and "occupied" humans a.k.a soul..know the difference”.
In my opinion, such as it is, this is a subject that should not be broached to people who are not ready to receive it. It can be a devastating
concept to ponder. The OP took an online source who has distorted the original teaching by Boris Mourivieff. Original is not quite right as these
teaching were learned and put together from fragments of teachings found in various eastern traditions…an most not widely presented within those
various systems (Buddist, Sufism, Yoga and eastern esoteric Christianity).
Mourivieff studied with G I Gurdjeiff and was friends with Oupensky. His trilogy “Gnosis” says in plain words (well, at least more so than the
riddles of Gurdjieff and Ouspensky) the hidden teachings of the above traditions. Main topics are harmonic’s of the universe and man, the many
little “I’s” of man, the soul and polar opposites/twin flames.
The subject here is the soul and the understanding from these various traditions that there are two races of humans, some with a soul and some without
a soul (for now). Mourivieff labels the former adamics and the latter pre-adamics.
Pre-Adamic…here on earth first, no soul, not prone to the same fits of anguish (but not without anguish (too much to explain)), does not
reincarnate but occasionally reach level they can have the spark of a soul and develop, will not go to the next level at rapture unless previous point
applies (using most well-known term here). They reach higher positions in society.
Adamics…start with Adam and the fall, have a soul, much anguish and questioning and often follows an esoteric path with loss of family/friends,
reincarnates through ‘film of life’ (another understanding of reincarnation which if requested I can explain in another thread), can go to next
level but possible to fail so badly they have to start over. Usually have lower positions in society.
According to Mourivieff these two races/souls are divided about 50/50 and tries to stay in balance. It is implied in his writings that there can be
more Adamic’s can upset the balance ,move us toward a new society and prolong or prevent a ‘trial by fire’ or destruction.
This is a brief synopsis and I can further explain any points of interest tomorrow. No doubt even this is somewhat corrupted from the original but it
is no doubt closer than those on the web.
Montalk was a member of Laura Knight Jadczyk’s forum as was I and while a brilliant young man, he became almost obsessed with what Laura termed
‘Organic Portals’ and has taken it to levels beyond what was originally taught. Laura read Gnosis and communicated with Mourivieff. To my
understanding the term 'Organic Portal' came from her channeling of the Cassopieans.
Anyone with a better understanding of these teaching please feel free to respond and/or correct.