It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by logical7
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by DarknStormy
Yep got to love the secular world. Its the Godless world.
I love a secular rule of law. And a secular rule of law will protect the rights of everyone to worship (or not worship) as they see fit. Having secular rule of law for everyone is the only fair and free rule of law. Any religious law that seeps in .. or is pushed in at the point of a sword or gun .. is a bad law. It will be unfair, unfree, and most likely STUPID.
do you think Jesus Christ pbuh is going to come and establish secular law?!! I don't know what you would call yourself if you really believe it!!
do you think Jesus Christ pbuh is going to come and establish secular law?!! I don't know what you would call yourself if you really believe it!!
Originally posted by sk0rpi0n
I think FF meant that secular law in this world, till Jesus comes is fine. And after that whatever law he establishes has to be followed by everybody.
As for protecting the rights of everyone to worship or not worship.. I wonder if FF believes Jesus would give unbelievers freedom of speech to insult God and him, as it happens these days in countries with a secular laws.
Originally posted by DarknStormy
Yeah that's what I don't understand... Secular law is so great but its exactly the opposite of what the Messiah would promote.. The Secular world is the exact opposite of religious
The baseline law for the entire world should be secular law. Then if certain people wish to self-police themselves and add their own silly religious laws on top of that FOR THEMSELVES ... then they can.
The problem with Astyanax's initial differentiation is that there is a not insignificant portion of Christianity that is unitarian. And I'm not so sure about his/her assertion that Islam has no concept of Free Will. The Quran states the opposite, and I don't quite agree that God's foreknowledge of events is evidence of a lack of free will, but that is a different topic.
Originally posted by Astyanax
I don't regard Unitarianism as Christianity in any except a historical sense (meaning that it originally evolved among Christian congregations). There are plenty who call themselves Christians, but I limit that definition to communities that accept the Apostolic Succession and the articles of the Nicene Creed. This definition embraces the Roman, Orthodox and Anglican congregations as well as most European Protestant and Reformed orders. It excludes Unitarianism and most post-Protestant American communities, including the Mormon religion.
Originally posted by Astyanax
However, in the hadith and most orthodox interpretations (at least in Sunni Islam; I'm not so familiar with the Shia), man's only free will is to believe in God and submit to Him, or to disbelieve and resist. And even this is foreordained. See, for example, here.
*Babloyi shrugs*
What can I say? Who am I to contradict your definition? I can't really respond to that, can I? I'm glad for you that you've categorised it for yourself to your satisfaction, I suppose.
Unrelated to the actual topic, but you do realise that wikiislam is an anti-islam website, and not really an islamic, or even neutral reservoir of information on Islam?