It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by pheonix358
There are two forces at work. The bottom of the slinky is held in place by the top of the slinky. When you release the top, the bottom is still held by the 'springiness' of the rest. As the top falls it releases the 'springiness is elasticity) as it falls.
An infinitely dense pole would have no elasticity and thus may move instantly in you example.
P
Originally posted by ChaoticOrder
reply to post by Korg Trinity
but what about electrons?
Would there actually be some sort of wave which caused the electrons at the end of the wire to react later then the electrons at the beginning of the wire? Or would all the electrons begin moving at the same time? Keep in mind electrons are quantum objects... I'm not exactly sure what the answer to this would be but it's much more complex than marbles.
Originally posted by ChaoticOrder
reply to post by Biigs
The wave is the first electron moving to the next atom and the electron knocked off the atom goes to the next one and so on till it gets to the end after many many electrons have swapped to the next atom. The speed of the wave, i would guess is some where in the neighborhood of the speed of light.
But I don't exactly think it works by each electron knocking the next one forward. The electrical potential exerts some sort of force on all the electrons at the same time... or something like that.
The only thing which might be able to travel faster than the speed of light, would be changing a gravity field - would that be instantly detected a light year away or not?
That's an open question really. We were discussing it along with other related topics just the other day in this thread:
Quantum interaction: 10,000 times faster than light
"for every action there is always an equal and opposite reaction" - Newtons Law of Motion.
Originally posted by ColeYounger
reply to post by Korg Trinity
"for every action there is always an equal and opposite reaction" - Newtons Law of Motion.
"shredded cabbage and carrots mixed with dressing or mayonnaise" - ColesLaw
Sorry...I couldn't resist.
On the question of how dense the matter of the pole in my thought experiment would effect the speed of data transfer, I think I need to make it very clear that the more dense the object would be the more 'stuff' there would be for the wave to travel through and thus the wave would be slower.
[...]
Counter intuitive huh? But true none the less.
Originally posted by ziplock9000
reply to post by Korg Trinity
"Nothing moves faster than the speed of light".. Thanks for the 100 year old info lol
Originally posted by ChaoticOrder
reply to post by Korg Trinity
On the question of how dense the matter of the pole in my thought experiment would effect the speed of data transfer, I think I need to make it very clear that the more dense the object would be the more 'stuff' there would be for the wave to travel through and thus the wave would be slower.
[...]
Counter intuitive huh? But true none the less.
Sorry to bump this thread after it has been dead for a few weeks but I had to respond to this. As mentioned by another poster I think this would be true until the pole reached infinite density. Once the pole reached infinite density with no gaps it wouldn't allow for any compression. But as Einstein noted it's impossible to push something of infinite mass. This problem is much like the FTL spaceship problem. The faster you make the ship go the heaver it gets. And as the ship gets heaver it takes more and more energy to propel it and to reach the speed of light means the ship must attain an infinite mass and therefore it would require infinite energy to propel it. I don't know that just sort of blew my mind when I thought about it that way.edit on 17/4/2013 by ChaoticOrder because: (no reason given)