It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The wave is the first electron moving to the next atom and the electron knocked off the atom goes to the next one and so on till it gets to the end after many many electrons have swapped to the next atom. The speed of the wave, i would guess is some where in the neighborhood of the speed of light.
The only thing which might be able to travel faster than the speed of light, would be changing a gravity field - would that be instantly detected a light year away or not?
Originally posted by Korg Trinity
If you were to build a pole of immense strength, of the most densest of materials you could make an object from. Then if you were to make this pole very very long, say from here to say one light year away.
What would happen if you pushed one end of the pole, in your mind’s eye the other end of the pole would also move as you pushed, this way you could send information faster than light….
WRONG….
The reason this doesn’t work is due to the fact that information in the traditional sense does not travel faster than light. So when you push at one end of the pole, the information has to travel down the pole and you get something called a compression wave down the pole, if you like when you push the pole what you are doing is sending a wave down the pole to the other end.
Originally posted by JohnPhoenix
Imagine a pencil on the table. If you push it, are you creating a wave and directing it to move along the pencil to the other end before the pencil moves? No your not.You are moving the entire structure through space at the same time.
This pole could be moving under it's own power just floating through space - you know once you set an object in motion it will stay in motion unless acted on by an equal or greater force - why then would this pole still have this compression wave? I don't think it would.
Originally posted by JohnPhoenix
Would you guys listen to yourselves? Your creating an imaginary object that cannot possibly exist and your telling me, it is impossible to push this imaginary object with sufficient imaginary force to move it.
Besides, I don't think you saw the rest of my post. I have a problem with his slinky metaphor.
WHY would you even have to push the pole? You don't. This pole could be moving under it's own power just floating through space - you know once you set an object in motion it will stay in motion unless acted on by an equal or greater force - why then would this pole still have this compression wave? I don't think it would. I think it's an unproven theory - and a bad one at that.
You guys maintain you would not be moving the object faster than light ( i never had a problem with that part) So lets say this pole is 1 light year long, and you pushed it or set it in motion, 3 light years ago... so what happens to your compression wave? Surely it's not still traveling to the end of the pole when the pole started moving 2 light years ago...edit on 1-4-2013 by JohnPhoenix because: adition
Originally posted by ChaoticOrder
reply to post by JohnPhoenix
No Trinity is correct, there's so much mass in a pole which is a light year long that it's impossible to push all of the mass at once, even if it was just an atom thick. The pole must compress because the force applied simply cannot push the huge amount of mass in front, and a compression wave would travel though it.
Originally posted by Korg Trinity
Originally posted by jiggerj
reply to post by Korg Trinity
Hmmm, if you push one one end of a pole a lightyear long, would the energy you put into it just be absorbed by the pole and never reach the other end?
I'm thinking shock absorbers on a car. You hit a pothole, the shock absorbers take in this energy, and then where does that energy go from there?
"for every action there is always an equal and opposite reaction" - Newtons Law of Motion.
In the case of the shock absorber, what you have is a cushioning effect, but the actual energy is stored in the spring, then released once more. The energy is not absorbed, just redirected.
Korg.
Originally posted by pheonix358
There are two forces at work. The bottom of the slinky is held in place by the top of the slinky. When you release the top, the bottom is still held by the 'springiness' of the rest. As the top falls it releases the 'springiness is elasticity) as it falls.
An infinitely dense pole would have no elasticity and thus may move instantly in you example.
P
Originally posted by Biigs
You can transmit information (in this case the push or twist of a pole) faster than the speed of light IF ...
Originally posted by Korg Trinity
If you were to build a pole of immense strength, of the most densest of materials you could make an object from. Then if you were to make this pole very very long, say from here to say one light year away.
What would happen if you pushed one end of the pole, in your mind’s eye the other end of the pole would also move as you pushed, this way you could send information faster than light….
WRONG….
Originally posted by pheonix358
reply to post by flexy123
Try again please. Granted that the outcome is debatable, but you do not understand the question being asked. It is not a pulse, it is the whole pole being moved.
Of course it will not work in the real universe but the theory of the question is quite valid. We just can not build the infinitely dense pole we require and if we could we would never move it because its mass would also be infinite.
May I suggest you examine the question some more.
P