It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JakiusFogg
reply to post by walliswallis
And a trade embargo without sanction by the UN is an act of war against that sovereign nation, which the UN is dity bound to intervene with thus guaranteeing the sovereignty. At this stage it becomes less about British Interest but the right of the islander for self-determination, which has been decided already.
Case closed.
Originally posted by walliswallis
Originally posted by JakiusFogg
reply to post by walliswallis
And a trade embargo without sanction by the UN is an act of war against that sovereign nation, which the UN is dity bound to intervene with thus guaranteeing the sovereignty. At this stage it becomes less about British Interest but the right of the islander for self-determination, which has been decided already.
Case closed.
I believe you're mistaken. A blockade is an act of war. Nations have the right to embargo whomever they like. Malvinas as the second smallest nation in the world (after the Vatican) is untenable. That's why I would wholeheartedly support a move for independence and I am happy the UN, acting through the Decolonization Committee, has declared all referendums that do not present a two option solution - independence or political integration - are invalid.
Big countries like the U.S. or Russia or China can hold out when the opinion of the world is arrayed against them. Little countries like England or Belgium or Australia do not have the same luxury. What will happen is inevitable. In less than 100 years the territory of Britain has shrank from 1/4 of the globe to a tiny island run by Belgium. It's really all just a waiting game for Argentina at this point; treading water. I wouldn't be surprised if - outside the nationalist aplomb on both sides - backroom negotiations for a transfer aren't already occurring. (It was a decade before we learned Blair had secretly offered to throw Gibraltar under the bus to Spain, after all.)
Originally posted by viaemail
Originally posted by walliswallis
ADMIRAL SIR SANDY WOODWARD:
"British military forces would be unable to retake the Falkland Islands were Argentina to invade"
www.huffingtonpost.co.uk... iers_n_1239939.html
GEN. SIR MICHAEL JACKSON
"The truth is we couldn't defend anything further than the other side of the Channel at this point."
www.dailymail.co.uk...
edit on 30-3-2013 by walliswallis because: corrected external links
All the defense we ever need.
Given the complexities of the US designed electronics and computer programmes embedded in every aspect of the Trident system it seems unlikely that a British prime minister could launch them – unless the US President gives his own authorisation.
www.theweek.co.uk...
Originally posted by viaemail
didn't stop the micks did it
Originally posted by viaemail
Originally posted by walliswallis
Originally posted by viaemail
Originally posted by walliswallis
ADMIRAL SIR SANDY WOODWARD:
"British military forces would be unable to retake the Falkland Islands were Argentina to invade"
www.huffingtonpost.co.uk... iers_n_1239939.html
GEN. SIR MICHAEL JACKSON
"The truth is we couldn't defend anything further than the other side of the Channel at this point."
www.dailymail.co.uk...
edit on 30-3-2013 by walliswallis because: corrected external links
All the defense we ever need.
The U.S. will not allow Britain to detonate a nuclear weapon in their hemisphere. And the UK does not have independent nuclear control as The Independent broke in a story several years ago. They even exposed that the publicity shots of missiles painted with "Royal Navy" were photographed at the US Navy depot in Georgia for press packets.
Given the complexities of the US designed electronics and computer programmes embedded in every aspect of the Trident system it seems unlikely that a British prime minister could launch them – unless the US President gives his own authorisation.
www.theweek.co.uk...
You seem to think that would stop us?
Originally posted by walliswallis
Originally posted by viaemail
didn't stop the micks did it
pretty much says it all about the pro-Brit control of Malvinas crowd; fairly typical, honestly, from the UK side in these kind of discussions
(I'm not Irish so I'm not offended on that point; I'm just offended as a human being. But not surprised.)
Originally posted by Wulfric
reply to post by viaemail
You're taking this too far, you are willing to open up an entire new argument simply to justify your own selfish means? There were unjustified attacks from both the Irish AND the English. Your ignorance is astounding. The Irish are our friends and will remain so for the foreseeable future, we are of the same blood despite the numerous invasions of England our gene pool remains around 70% Celtic.edit on 30-3-2013 by Wulfric because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Wulfric
reply to post by viaemail
You're taking this too far, you are willing to open up an entire new argument simply to justify your own selfish means? There were unjustified attacks from both the Irish AND the English. Your ignorance is astounding. The Irish are our friends and will remain so for the foreseeable future, we are of the same blood despite the numerous invasions of England our gene pool remains around 70% Celtic.
Originally posted by viaemail
Originally posted by walliswallis
Originally posted by viaemail
didn't stop the micks did it
pretty much says it all about the pro-Brit control of Malvinas crowd; fairly typical, honestly, from the UK side in these kind of discussions
(I'm not Irish so I'm not offended on that point; I'm just offended as a human being. But not surprised.)
There is no "crowd", the Islands are ours, they have been throughout history, and will be for the rest of time. Any nation that wishes to try and change that should recieve a Hiroshima breakfast.
Originally posted by woogleuk
You can't blame an entire country for the actions of a few.
Originally posted by woogleuk
And as one of the few Brits on ATS who respects Queen and country, your traitorous comment is laughable at best.
Originally posted by woogleuk
Having a sense of decency and respect is not traitorous.
Originally posted by woogleuk
Being a small minded, bigoted numpty however is never cool.
Originally posted by walliswallis
Originally posted by Wulfric
reply to post by viaemail
You're taking this too far, you are willing to open up an entire new argument simply to justify your own selfish means? There were unjustified attacks from both the Irish AND the English. Your ignorance is astounding. The Irish are our friends and will remain so for the foreseeable future, we are of the same blood despite the numerous invasions of England our gene pool remains around 70% Celtic.
you're wasting your breath; this kind of vitriol and hatred is basically at the heart of the "Falklands are British" argument
it's like people who say "I don't support the KKK - I just don't want blacks in my child's classroom" ... you're just two stones removed
unfortunately, many Britons don't realize the kind of hatemongering and extremism they're singing onto when they join the nationalist chest-thumpers/crypto-BNPers who control the British side of the discussion - this is kind of why the whole world (except France) has aligned against the UK on this ... it's just too ugly of an argument the UK presents, for their all-white South Atlantic volkstaat
Originally posted by walliswallis
Originally posted by viaemail
Originally posted by walliswallis
Originally posted by viaemail
didn't stop the micks did it
pretty much says it all about the pro-Brit control of Malvinas crowd; fairly typical, honestly, from the UK side in these kind of discussions
(I'm not Irish so I'm not offended on that point; I'm just offended as a human being. But not surprised.)
There is no "crowd", the Islands are ours, they have been throughout history, and will be for the rest of time. Any nation that wishes to try and change that should recieve a Hiroshima breakfast.
Again, how would you deliver your "Hiroshima breakfast?" As has been reported extensively in the media (see my link above - I can provide half a dozen more if you like) you have no nuclear launch capability without US authorization.