It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MystikMushroom
reply to post by Destinyone
Hm, 3 trips? They most likely have a website that tells you what kinds of documents are required.
The DMV is an issuing authority for ID cards and driver's licenses that can be used world wide to provide proof of identity. One shouldn't be able to just waltz in there and get an official form of identification easy-peasy.
Am I a fan of the "Real ID" act? No, but when people bitch about the DMV it rubs me the wrong way. If people just had their # together before they even went, things would go smoothly. The burden of proof is on you the customer to prove who you say you are, not the other way around.
I even will call a store before I leave the house to make sure they have the item I want, so as not to waste my time. A little preparation and "homework" can go a long way.
Originally posted by Happy1
reply to post by Destinyone
My boyfriend's son is turning 16, and will be getting a driver's license. I was going to sign my extra car over to his name and let him drive it. Per Progressive - insurance for him in the state of MN, where he resides, having a car in his name - 2002 ford focus, paid for - would be $700.00 for the first month, and then payments of $400.00 for the next 3 months. WTF!
The kid's on the honor roll, no problems with "discipline", no legal problems.
When my son turned 16, back in 1997, insurance on his own, paid for car was $126.00 a month - high, but he needed to have a car to be able to have a part-time job to pay for it.
These car insurance payments are like a house payment!!!!
Getting rid of cars? and the pollution and freedom they may cause? I wonder what that's about.
Originally posted by CUBD1
Nazi Germany is here.
Wish OP had or would update his post with a list of states who are opting out and states who are imposing this.
Seems to be some confusion on who is doing it and who isn't.
On Dec. 20, the Department of Homeland Security issued a press release announcing that beginning on Jan. 15, 2013, those states that are not in compliance with the REAL ID standards will receive a temporary deferment of enforcement, of at least six months, during which federal agencies will continue to accept state-issued drivers licenses and identification cards from those states for boarding commercial aircraft and other official purposes. Following this minimum period of six months of non-enforcement, DHS will announce, no later than Fall 2013, a schedule for phased-in enforcement. While DHS did not offer a specific date as to when phased-in enforcement would begin, they did note that the announcement of phased-in enforcement will not result in immediate enforcement.
As part of this announcement, DHS sent individual letters to each state’s governor’s office. DHS organized states into three groups based on their standing with regards to REAL ID compliance. The first group, consisting of 13 states (Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Iowa, Indiana, Maryland, Ohio, South Dakota, Tennessee, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming) was found to have met the standards of the REAL ID Act of 2005 for driver’s licenses and identification cards. The second group consisted of those states that are not yet compliant with the standards but have contacted DHS regarding the status of their implementation efforts. The third group consists of states from which DHS has not received any information regarding that state’s REAL ID implementation efforts.
www.ncsl.org...
REAL ID State Legislation Database
The REAL ID State Legislation Database tracks state legislative response to the federal REAL ID Act of 2005. The database contains bill numbers, sponsor information, bill summaries, status information, and, where available, links to legislation. Information in the database is updated on a daily basis. Questions about database content should be directed to Anne Teigen and Molly Ramsdell.
www.ncsl.org...
Originally posted by FyreByrd
Originally posted by sprtpilot
They won't inconvenience or "weed out" illegal aliens or any lock-step Democrat voter group.
You should NEVER willingly bend to oppression because there will always be the next ratcheting-up coming. Obviously.
Where is the Federal Governments standing in STATE drivers' licenses anyway? Not there, and this back-door method to usurp states' rights again should not be tolerated.
Speaking of lock-step Democrats - I looked up the original bill H.R. 418 of the 109th Congress.
beta.congress.gov...
The bill has 140 co-sponsers. All but two of them are Republican. Lock-Step gentlemen?
Introduced by a Republican, signed into law by G. Bush II.
A nice conservative - Federalist Law.
California's Drive to Give Illegal Aliens Driver's Licenses
By issuing driver's licenses to illegal aliens, California also risks repeating Maryland's 2009 mistake, when the state became a magnet for illegal aliens, who overran the Maryland motor vehicle agency with out-of-state and out-of-country driver's license applications. In Maryland, that surge not only drained the state's health and education coffers, but also increased crime. Despite being stridently anti-REAL ID and pro-illegal alien, Maryland's governor was nevertheless forced to call an emergency meeting of the state legislature to implement REAL ID compliance. The drain on state resources subsided almost immediately and today Maryland is a leader in REAL ID compliance.
California is living Maryland's history and needs to consider the consequences of permitting illegal aliens to obtain driver's licenses when 53 of 56 jurisdictions nationwide (the 50 states and six territories) already enjoy the benefits of REAL ID.
www.cis.org...
Originally posted by gamesmaster63
reply to post by links234
I have a reasonable argument from my own family's history.
About 30 years ago, we discovered that the courthouse that housed all the records for one branch of our family had burned down. This caused the destruction of original documents for about 15 of my relatives. They are not capable of getting original documentation such as Birth Certificates because of this, and under the direct wording of RealID, they will never be able to get valid State DL's or ID's.
Originally posted by MystikMushroom
The burden of proof is on you the customer to prove who you say you are, not the other way around.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
Originally posted by Destinyone
reply to post by DarkSecret
Well...that would be all fine and dandy, if it were not for some States, because of this Administration signing into executive order, that *some* Illegal Aliens can scoot around the REAL ID Act, and get a valid DL. California being one.
Do you call that fair application of the law.? I certainly don't. Hell, I was born here,have been a paying member of the system from the get go. Yet, I still have to jump through hoops, and they don't.
California's Drive to Give Illegal Aliens Driver's Licenses
By issuing driver's licenses to illegal aliens, California also risks repeating Maryland's 2009 mistake, when the state became a magnet for illegal aliens, who overran the Maryland motor vehicle agency with out-of-state and out-of-country driver's license applications. In Maryland, that surge not only drained the state's health and education coffers, but also increased crime. Despite being stridently anti-REAL ID and pro-illegal alien, Maryland's governor was nevertheless forced to call an emergency meeting of the state legislature to implement REAL ID compliance. The drain on state resources subsided almost immediately and today Maryland is a leader in REAL ID compliance.
California is living Maryland's history and needs to consider the consequences of permitting illegal aliens to obtain driver's licenses when 53 of 56 jurisdictions nationwide (the 50 states and six territories) already enjoy the benefits of REAL ID.
www.cis.org...
Des
Originally posted by Destinyone
It will be required to be renewed every 15 years in order to retain a Valid DL in all states that have it now, and will get it.
Des
Originally posted by gps777
Originally posted by Destinyone
It will be required to be renewed every 15 years in order to retain a Valid DL in all states that have it now, and will get it.
Des
Just so I understand this correctly Des.
It used to be every 10 years to renew,now its 5,but every 15 you have to produce all of your info ie birth certificates etc is that correct?
Also do you have to have your photo renewed every 5 years?
Originally posted by NotAConsumer
reply to post by Destinyone
Im in a position of sleeping on family members couches, not paying utility, SO if thats the case and REAL ID was mandatory for things like leaving the state you could say that im screwed right?