It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
All I see in NK related threads is a collection of the most retarded, macho tough guy "we're invincible and don't care about the local population" replies.
Someone please xplain to me why an entire nation should be punished for it's being brainwashed and horribly mistreated by it's crazy leader?
Originally posted by Catch_a_Fire
Originally posted by Strawberry88
You're a braindead piece of filth if you hope NK gets bombed, if you do, you deserve retaliation in the form of a counter attack hitting nothing but civilians as well, but I'm not that sick to actually encourage such a thing, unlike many here. You disgust me.
I think this may have been a little strong.
If your reading the thread properly you'll see that a lot of what is being said is directed at the regime, not the civilians. Fact of the matter is if Pyonyang was bombed, it would be mainly be people with direct ties to the regime that would suffer as the real people of NK cannot afford to live there. These real civilians live in the country like animals, they dont have the shelter of a city.
But you go ahead and label us all like you have.
This is a joke, right? Like in the middle-east?
Originally posted by DAVID64
With the technology and satellite capability we have, I would bet the military knows where the bunkers are and where Lil' Kim will be hiding. Those will get the first shots, along with key command bunkers. Politically, they will need to keep civilian casualties to a minimum. Humanely, let's hope they can. I don't put it past the NK generals to have their hidey holes in populated areas.
With the technology and satellite capability we have, I would bet the military knows where the bunkers are and where Lil' Kim will be hiding
Originally posted by Gazrok
reply to post by DAVID64
With the technology and satellite capability we have, I would bet the military knows where the bunkers are and where Lil' Kim will be hiding
Have you researched this? No, we won't have a clue where he is. Our satellites cannot see through 80m of rock. They even use dummy vents, etc. to misdirect bunker locations. Because it's a closed society, our intel is limited. We'll simply be bombing the hell out of every main bunker we can locate. The only way we'll even know we got him, is when the C&C structure is no longer operating (and even then, if I were one of his generals, I'd pretend he was still around, giving the orders).
Originally posted by Strawberry88
@reply on previous page; if you are offended, I guess you shouldbe if you feel I was talking about you... It was obviously directed at the "go USA, bomb the # out of them"-people, if you're one of them, I dont see why I should feel bad about the harsh words, its how I genuinely feel about people who are so blind to wish death upon strangers who are more a victim than the big boys with the big words will ever be.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Ouch...... That was beyond unnecessary. As if anyone in the world needs to see them to know they have the range to be anywhere across it. I mean Kim's being a child with a tantrum ...but if the child's holding a knife or a gun, it's not really wise to push their buttons so hard they snap like a dry branch, either.
Saving face is a huge thing over there...as I understand it? Obama's fast leaving Kim no way out with moves like this. The logic escapes me. At least the B-52 could be debated as having lots of other uses. Iraq saw it far more often than I'm sure they wanted to in 1991. No nukes...just rains of thunder. The B2 tho? Gee.. Why don't we pop a test shot at Johnston Atoll while we're at it. Didn't some idiot do that during the Cuban Missile Crisis? Nothing like a nice road flare in the gas tank to warm things up.
I mostly agree with what you're saying but I feel that even a single civilian is one too many. We're talking about a suppressed people that doesn't deserve what theyre getting now, let alone what is very likely coming their way... I admit I cant propose a solution, but there must be a better one than precise bombing etc, as there will, imo, always be too many casualties, be it civilian or indoctrinated followers.
We will NOT go nuclear in NK, even if he uses them...you can take that to the bank.
Originally posted by iwan2ski
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
At least the B-52 could be debated as having lots of other uses. Iraq saw it far more often than I'm sure they wanted to in 1991. No nukes...just rains of thunder. The B2 tho?
As a prior crew chief on the B-2 bomber, I can tell you that munitions wise, they have the same capability, both carry conventional, smart and nuclear bombs. The only big difference is that the B-2 can get there undetected. Also, the B-2 only carries nukes while flying if they are actually given the order for a real world possible attack...or accidentally left installed after an extensive nuclear assurancy drills (which happened once and now results in new guidelines, training and tighter restrictions).
edit on 28-3-2013 by iwan2ski because: (no reason given)
Preferably with a tunneling weapon like the Bunker Buster plowing the path and a very small (by relative standards) tactical nuke following it down to literally erase Kim from existence
Just for the record.. I know the B-2 has been a busy bomber since the wars began and hasn't carried a single nuke in anger for the whole duration.
Originally posted by Gazrok
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
Obama's fast leaving Kim no way out with moves like this. The logic escapes me
Isn't it obvious?
The more it escalates, the more likely Kim is to either do something stupid, or come to the table to talk. Either way, we win politically.
Seems there are a few here that think B-2 in nuclear terms when it is obviously capable of so much more. A good precision munition down the chimney or in Little Kim's window will make him see the light... even if only a flash.
Another use of the B-2, is delivery of the MOP (Massive Ordnance Penetrator). Unlike the previous bunker busters, which could do 30m, the MOP can do 61m depths. However, some of NK's installations are rumored to be 80m deep, so may take two hits per target. Luckily, that is the payload of the B-2...
We will NOT go nuclear in NK, even if he uses them...you can take that to the bank.edit on 28-3-2013 by Gazrok because: (no reason given)