It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Constitution of the United States seems to guarantee All citizens Equal Protection Under the Law (of the United States; that is to say, at the Federal level).
Short of excising this clause from the Constitution, should it be possible to exclude, by popular vote, and without any other considerations, Any group of citizens from the protection of this clause?
Originally posted by inverslyproportional
reply to post by Bhadhidar
Yes we do have equal protections under the law. Just not equal privileges, that was not was promised, nor should it be.
Originally posted by xedocodex
Originally posted by inverslyproportional
reply to post by Bhadhidar
Yes we do have equal protections under the law. Just not equal privileges, that was not was promised, nor should it be.
Why don't you think equal privileges should be ensured?
What twisted logic can you come up with that says that two consenting adults should be denied certain legal benefits because of their sex?
Originally posted by frazzle
reply to post by Bhadhidar
The Constitution of the United States seems to guarantee All citizens Equal Protection Under the Law (of the United States; that is to say, at the Federal level).
Short of excising this clause from the Constitution, should it be possible to exclude, by popular vote, and without any other considerations, Any group of citizens from the protection of this clause?
In the first place, equal protection isn't IN the constitution, its in the 14th amendment which many claim wasn't even properly ratified.
Second, everyone knows that corporations have far more rights under the law than individual citizens, so wouldn't it make more sense to skip the marriage license altogether and simply incorporate? Get an LLC and write your own bylaws. Want a divorce? Dissolve the corporation. Bing, bang, boom.