It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mbkennel
Originally posted by TheKeyMaster
It shows how disinfo works... how people can be fooled and not see the whole picture. The exact same thing is being done right now with electrogravitics and these actuators are the tip of that iceberg.
What evidence do you have that there is anything behind "electrogravitics"? From what I've seen (the nonsense from LaViollette) it's the opposite.
What evidence is there that plasma actuators are related?
Originally posted by boomer135
reply to post by Stealthbomber
But if the B-2 had that type of system onboard that gave it unlimited range, then why do we still refuel them multiple times when they take off from Whiteman, bomb Afghanistan, and land back at Whiteman?
Originally posted by Bedlam
"Oh, the eeeeevil ones broke into my lab, stole all my magic plans and my flying cars, and I can't build any more, the dog ate my homework"
In the time since, Brown has attracted hordes of believers who skipped out on high school sciences. This has led to the somewhat manic embrace of "lifters" which were featured upthread, IIRC. Also, when someone at NG leaked that drawing of the wing charging system, it was immediately seized upon by hordes of Browniacs, some here on ATS, who didn't understand about plasma's effects on boundary flow. Or that it had uses in stealth. So they became convinced that the B-2 had a magical, mystical "Brown thruster".
It lingers to this day in claims such as KeyMaster's, who is apparently still convinced it is related in some way.
Good thing he hasn't heard of Dean yet, I suppose.edit on 30-3-2013 by Bedlam because: (no reason given)edit on 30-3-2013 by Bedlam because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TheKeyMaster
Originally posted by boomer135
reply to post by Stealthbomber
But if the B-2 had that type of system onboard that gave it unlimited range, then why do we still refuel them multiple times when they take off from Whiteman, bomb Afghanistan, and land back at Whiteman?
Because it would be a little obvious if they didn't?
I mean come on.. give the military a tiny bit more credit than that.... Since all this info has come out about them they might have even abandoned the use of this tech in them. Them keeping this tech secret is probably far more important to them than any threat out there right now....
Originally posted by TheKeyMaster
Originally posted by Bedlam
"Oh, the eeeeevil ones broke into my lab, stole all my magic plans and my flying cars, and I can't build any more, the dog ate my homework"
In the time since, Brown has attracted hordes of believers who skipped out on high school sciences. This has led to the somewhat manic embrace of "lifters" which were featured upthread, IIRC. Also, when someone at NG leaked that drawing of the wing charging system, it was immediately seized upon by hordes of Browniacs, some here on ATS, who didn't understand about plasma's effects on boundary flow. Or that it had uses in stealth. So they became convinced that the B-2 had a magical, mystical "Brown thruster".
It lingers to this day in claims such as KeyMaster's, who is apparently still convinced it is related in some way.
Good thing he hasn't heard of Dean yet, I suppose.edit on 30-3-2013 by Bedlam because: (no reason given)edit on 30-3-2013 by Bedlam because: (no reason given)
TTBrown was dead on right... the way you talk about him and shoot down his work entirely it just adds more and more fuel to my curiosity regarding your agenda here....
I strongly urge anyone and everyone to read Paul LaViolette's book - Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion as well as Nick Cook's book The Hunt for Zero Point. Everything you need to know is there...
Why is there so much unwarranted skepticism regarding the possibility of revolutionary tech made by humans yet EVERYWHERE on the internet including here people are entranced with aliens? Is it human nature or an immense campaign?
Originally posted by mbkennel
It lingers to this day in claims such as KeyMaster's, who is apparently still convinced it is related in some way.
Everything except physics.
It's because people who know how physics actually works recognize nonsense.
Originally posted by mbkennel
Or perhaps the plasma actuators and technology still obey the laws of physics and give lower fuel consumption but not zero fuel consumption.
Originally posted by TheKeyMaster
Originally posted by boomer135
reply to post by Stealthbomber
But if the B-2 had that type of system onboard that gave it unlimited range, then why do we still refuel them multiple times when they take off from Whiteman, bomb Afghanistan, and land back at Whiteman?
Because it would be a little obvious if they didn't?
I mean come on.. give the military a tiny bit more credit than that.... Since all this info has come out about them they might have even abandoned the use of this tech in them. Them keeping this tech secret is probably far more important to them than any threat out there right now....
Originally posted by _Del_
Originally posted by TheKeyMaster
Originally posted by boomer135
reply to post by Stealthbomber
But if the B-2 had that type of system onboard that gave it unlimited range, then why do we still refuel them multiple times when they take off from Whiteman, bomb Afghanistan, and land back at Whiteman?
Because it would be a little obvious if they didn't?
I mean come on.. give the military a tiny bit more credit than that.... Since all this info has come out about them they might have even abandoned the use of this tech in them. Them keeping this tech secret is probably far more important to them than any threat out there right now....
So they spent millions retrofitting this miracle capability into an aircraft fleet consuming 50 billion dollars, but they just stopped using it? So people wouldn't learn about it? Wouldn't it make more sense to have had this miracle capability implemented in a purpose-built craft that noone knows about then?
Originally posted by C0bzz
reply to post by Stealthbomber
This picture appears to be a scan from a book, but since the context from the surrounding pages is gone it tells us very little.
It just uses a whole lot of buzz-words like "capacitor", "electrically charges", "gravity wave" to explain away what amounts to magic.
How does charging the exhaust reduce the IR signature? Not explained.
How do you charge the leading edge and exhaust? Oh, that's not explained either.
How does charging the leading edge and exhaust lead produce a "gravity wave"? Not explained. What is a "flame jet generator"? Not explained. Unfortunately without context, this picture is meaningless. Where is the scan from? Also it's highly probable that it's fake, since faking something like that would be extremely easy.