It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by maddog3n8
In order to accomplish the answer to your questions, testing would have to be done, to find what is the threshold were mercury or aluminum starts to have visible effects on humans, find out by decade how many of those with autism or encepholy were vaccinated to include frequency, dosage, type, and ingredients, data mine by region the environmental sources for heavy metal, etc....the list goes on and on.
To me you either did not read my evidence or you don't wish to factor it into the equation. I would submit the reason that you do not want to consider this is that the alternative answer is so repugnant that it is easier to believe.
Your arrogance is truly through the roof. Do you even bother to self regulate when you write? To not go overboard with your insults? To wonder whether you're even being fair? Lets simplify this conversation and move away from the ad hominems.
What I am contending is that to assume as much as you're assuming (yet you amazingly mention occams razor, yet apparently dont know how to use it), such as: 1) there is only one explanation for autism, chemicals in vaccines
I don't want to offend your clearly very large ego
The irrationality of your thinking is obvious to anyone with a good education.
How you can read up on the research of Simon Baron Cohen, Michael Merzenich, understand alternative explanations, deny the hard science those explanations are founded upon, in favor of your own tendentious preference, is inane.
Read this article, since clearly you're not satisfied with my explanation of how the premature closing of BDNF during early development interrupts normal brain development, and thus, helps explain the formation of autism.
since clearly you're not satisfied with my explanation
Originally posted by craig732
reply to post by kerazeesicko
Here is your proof