It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The OP practiced asceticism for a time and failed to achieve enlightenment. So this thread seems to be about consoling himself and his pride, as many of his threads are. As if to say, "spirituality is paradoxical nonsense anyway, and so it isn't really ME that failed... it's spirituality itself that failed and besides I'm alive and breathing and that's all it really is anyway just look at the words and their history"
Before Enlightenment chop wood carry water,
after Enlightenment, chop wood carry water
Originally posted by BlueMule
reply to post by TiM3LoRd
The OP practiced asceticism for a time and failed to achieve enlightenment. So this thread seems to be about consoling himself and his pride, as many of his threads are. As if to say, "spirituality is paradoxical nonsense anyway, and so it isn't really ME that failed... it's spirituality itself that failed and besides I'm alive and breathing and that's all it really is anyway just look at the words and their history"
edit on 23-3-2013 by BlueMule because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Angle
But: Jesus said of himself, he is the way, truth.. and life.
Originally posted by LesMisanthrope
The foundation of spirituality is life, yet its advocates teach us death. A paradox. An irony. A contradiction.
Originally posted by wasaka
It is a strange phenomenon: those who know, they never try
to reduce their knowing to knowledge; and those who don't know,
create knowledge, but that is just their invention.
Originally posted by LesMisanthrope
reply to post by BlueMule
No it isn't. The foundation of spirituality is the mystical experiences of people like Jesus, Lau Tzu, The Prophet Muhammad, Moses, etc.
The laws of logic are the laws of our everyday consciousness and experience... they have no application to mystical experiences which are beyond everyday consciousness and experience, beyond ideas, beyond words, beyond logic, beyond definitions.
But not beyond experiencing.
That One which is beyond all thought is inconceivable by all thought -Dionysius the Areopagite
That Oneness is on the other side of descriptions and states. Nothing but duality enters speech's playing-field -Rumi
Nonsense. That is the foundation of religion—the repudiation of spirituality, the antithesis of spirituality, denial of spirituality. I mentioned the etymology of the words "spirit" and "spirituality" mean "to breathe". Life is the roots from which the tree of spirituality grows. If you can refute the etymology of spirit, you could refute my arguments.
To be spiritual, one must be alive. How does "to breathe" translate to mystical experiences? Correct; it doesn't—at least not until religion has had its perverse way with the concept, having convinced the religiously motivated and credulous otherwise. One must first be breathing and living and animated before he can have a mystical experience.
Originally posted by LesMisanthrope
reply to post by BlueMule
The OP practiced asceticism for a time and failed to achieve enlightenment. So this thread seems to be about consoling himself and his pride, as many of his threads are. As if to say, "spirituality is paradoxical nonsense anyway, and so it isn't really ME that failed... it's spirituality itself that failed and besides I'm alive and breathing and that's all it really is anyway just look at the words and their history"
This thread is about showing the absurdity of modern spiritualists.
I have never said spirituality has failed, except that we have failed spirituality.
Originally posted by BlueMule
Originally posted by LesMisanthrope
reply to post by BlueMule
The OP practiced asceticism for a time and failed to achieve enlightenment. So this thread seems to be about consoling himself and his pride, as many of his threads are. As if to say, "spirituality is paradoxical nonsense anyway, and so it isn't really ME that failed... it's spirituality itself that failed and besides I'm alive and breathing and that's all it really is anyway just look at the words and their history"
This thread is about showing the absurdity of modern spiritualists.
As opposed to what? The reasonable spirituality of the past?
I have never said spirituality has failed, except that we have failed spirituality.
Somehow you got the idea that spirituality is supposed to be reasonable. So it fails to live up to your unreasonable expectations.
But it's you that failed.
And now it seems that your crusade on this forum is about looking down your nose at spiritual people so that you can feel better about yourself and your failure.
edit on 24-3-2013 by BlueMule because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by NorEaster
Damn, for someone who's achieved spiritual enlightenment, you're a pretty raw-nerve kind of mystic, aren't you.
"...by their fruits ye shall know them." Who was it that said that?
Originally posted by BlueMule
Originally posted by NorEaster
Damn, for someone who's achieved spiritual enlightenment, you're a pretty raw-nerve kind of mystic, aren't you.
"...by their fruits ye shall know them." Who was it that said that?
Raw-nerve? I like that. Jesus could be raw-nerve too. I think of it as tough-love rebuking. I'm frank and straight up and brutally honest. It's one of the things my wife loves about me.
edit on 24-3-2013 by BlueMule because: (no reason given)