Queen Michelle Obama Stamp

page: 5
21
<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in

join

posted on Mar, 23 2013 @ 11:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by ~widowmaker~
reply to post by beezzer
 


lies all lies, its some stupid fashion award on a cover of a magazine.


We know. But depicted wearing a crown? What kind of message is that sending?

Does the magazine consider her royalty?

Or does she consider herself royalty?




posted on Mar, 23 2013 @ 11:43 AM
link   

Originally posted by galacticgirl
reply to post by beezzer
 


I'm not upset - just taking a deep breath and feeling the animosity sent toward the First Lady. She grows organic vegetables, promotes good health and exercise. Really good reasons to condemn and cast aspersions at her.
...and Kim-jon-il had a unicorn ,knew each and everyone's name that lived in in north korea ,graduated on every notable graduation there is, was in direct contact with the creator and .. !!11 .....

Its true , it was in North korea's newspapers.



edit on 23-3-2013 by Rubic0n because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 23 2013 @ 11:46 AM
link   

Originally posted by beezzer

Originally posted by ~widowmaker~
reply to post by beezzer
 


lies all lies, its some stupid fashion award on a cover of a magazine.


We know. But depicted wearing a crown? What kind of message is that sending?

Does the magazine consider her royalty?

Or does she consider herself royalty?


beezer, come on. Why would you say "does she consider herself royalty?" when she has nothing to do with this conceptual "art" piece? Do you honestly believe the magazine considers her royalty? Have you never seen other depictions like this? This is really silly and another excuse to attack her...she has NOTHING to do with this...

CJ

CJ



posted on Mar, 23 2013 @ 11:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by ColoradoJens


beezer, come on. Why would you say "does she consider herself royalty?" when she has nothing to do with this conceptual "art" piece?

I think it a legitimate question based on her actions for the past 5 years. And how do you know she had nothing to do with it?



Do you honestly believe the magazine considers her royalty?

Obviously.


Have you never seen other depictions like this?

No. Have you? Especially with first ladies?




This is really silly and another excuse to attack her...she has NOTHING to do with this...

CJ

CJ


Nope. I feel it a legit conspiracy topic.



posted on Mar, 23 2013 @ 11:58 AM
link   
And this is what stands for 'breaking political news' these days? Come on folks, this is ATS, lift the bar a bit.



posted on Mar, 23 2013 @ 12:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by Jadette
And this is what stands for 'breaking political news' these days? Come on folks, this is ATS, lift the bar a bit.


I first caught the story from a snippet from CNN, the I looked up the stamp depiction. As just herself? Not a real story.

Since she was depicted as royalty, I thought it merited a thread.



posted on Mar, 23 2013 @ 12:08 PM
link   
reply to post by beezzer
 


Oh my. Do you typically follow the fashion magaizines? Now truly they are paragons for making important statements (not).

I guess you need to start a thread on Victoria Beckham and Kate Moss and someone named Tinie Tempah...

royatly of FASHION decided by FASHION editors

The esteemed know it alls PICKED her, aka she had nothing to do with it. At least she didn't pose, like some people, as Jesus.



CJ



posted on Mar, 23 2013 @ 12:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by ColoradoJens
reply to post by beezzer
 


Oh my. Do you typically follow the fashion magaizines? Now truly they are paragons for making important statements (not).


CJ


No.
They aren't paragons for important statements, but they do reflect current trends, do they not?



posted on Mar, 23 2013 @ 12:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by beezzer


Disgusting.

All I have to say about that.



posted on Mar, 23 2013 @ 12:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by ColoradoJens








Poor Tim Tebow...........

His stamp will come soon..............



posted on Mar, 23 2013 @ 12:33 PM
link   
reply to post by beezzer
 


Criminey, you've made me look at fashion magazines. There is plenty, and I ain't going to go through the pain to post it, of this type of thing from Nancy Regan to Laura Bush ($8,500 Oscar de la Renta gowns). Please for the love of God don't post more fashion editor choices as legitamate conspiracies...

CJ



posted on Mar, 23 2013 @ 12:34 PM
link   
reply to post by sonnny1
 


ANd I thought idolatry was a no-no.

CJ



posted on Mar, 23 2013 @ 12:36 PM
link   
reply to post by ColoradoJens
 




Not when you look like Tim Tebow..........






posted on Mar, 23 2013 @ 12:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by CaticusMaximus

Originally posted by beezzer


Disgusting.

All I have to say about that.


Agreed. Fashion magazines and those who feel they are important or have anything worthy of saying are just that.

Here's one that probably fits your style better.



CJ



posted on Mar, 23 2013 @ 12:44 PM
link   
reply to post by ColoradoJens
 


The magazines I enjoy usually have you colouring within the lines.

But thanks all the same.



posted on Mar, 23 2013 @ 12:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by ColoradoJens
 


The magazines I enjoy usually have you colouring within the lines.

But thanks all the same.


Beezer, step back. Admit this is stretching it. There is no conspiracy. You don't like her and some lame brained fashion editors picked her for their "fashion royalty" spread. That's it.

"Highlights" is a good choice for coloring within the lines.

CJ



posted on Mar, 23 2013 @ 12:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by ColoradoJens

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by ColoradoJens
 


The magazines I enjoy usually have you colouring within the lines.

But thanks all the same.


Beezer, step back. Admit this is stretching it. There is no conspiracy. You don't like her and some lame brained fashion editors picked her for their "fashion royalty" spread. That's it.

"Highlights" is a good choice for coloring within the lines.

CJ



Tell you what.

I did a search and could find no other first lady depicted as a queen with a crown.

You find another fashion mag that had a past first lady depicted in a similar fashion and I will concede the point.

Fair?



posted on Mar, 23 2013 @ 12:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by beezzer

Originally posted by ColoradoJens

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by ColoradoJens
 


The magazines I enjoy usually have you colouring within the lines.

But thanks all the same.


Beezer, step back. Admit this is stretching it. There is no conspiracy. You don't like her and some lame brained fashion editors picked her for their "fashion royalty" spread. That's it.

"Highlights" is a good choice for coloring within the lines.

CJ



Tell you what.

I did a search and could find no other first lady depicted as a queen with a crown.

You find another fashion mag that had a past first lady depicted in a similar fashion and I will concede the point.

Fair?


Please, don't make me do that. Are you just torturing me?

CJ



posted on Mar, 23 2013 @ 12:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by ColoradoJens


Please, don't make me do that. Are you just torturing me?

CJ


Yes.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA



posted on Mar, 23 2013 @ 01:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by sonnny1

Originally posted by ColoradoJens








Poor Tim Tebow...........

His stamp will come soon..............


There's no way Tim Tebow is straight.





new topics
top topics
 
21
<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in

join